Ran Accross this Thread on another Forum
Originally Posted by Accordaleer
Are you being serious? Looks like half the tire is making contact with the road.
Originally Posted by terrasmak
Actually its closer to 60% on the road. I took this pic of an example at D1.
it's cause you have to change the camber in order to fit the damn wheel n rim under the fender. .. . .
tell me if i am wrong but that is DANGEROUS! A tire is held on by force or suction. Since your streatching a thin tire already to cover more area I doub there is enough force to stay on the rim. I could see a show car doing this but a daily driver or driven on normal roads is just dangerous.
Originally Posted by phat04350z
tell me if i am wrong but that is DANGEROUS! A tire is held on by force or suction. Since your streatching a thin tire already to cover more area I doub there is enough force to stay on the rim. I could see a show car doing this but a daily driver or driven on normal roads is just dangerous.
agreed. .plus the amount of air PSI that has to be inside just to keep it sticking to the damn rim. . .
Originally Posted by DraGonAlchemist
Looking to race my friends father's ROUCHE if he ever takes it out!!!
It was all in good fun.
I agree with them that it does look stupid (I don't get the stretch tire thing), but that doesn't make the 350z any less of a car. I've seen plenty of tacky/poorly modded Mustangs as well as every other kind of car that has any kind of mod support. There will always be people that take things too far in the wrong direction. A lot of people on there seemed to understand that though.
Originally Posted by terrasmak
Actually its closer to 60% on the road. I took this pic of an example at D1.
Talk about uneven wear and horrible handling. The more center of the tire you have on the ground the better then handling. So now we can say this is dangerous and provides no performance feel or improvement
Originally Posted by phat04350z
Talk about uneven wear and horrible handling. The more center of the tire you have on the ground the better then handling. So now we can say this is dangerous and provides no performance feel or improvement
so most fo the cars that were there were probably cars that drifted.... so they really dont care about uneven wear..... and i guess it would be easier for them to get the cars sideways with only 60% of the tire being on the road.
Originally Posted by AlexBG
but like he said he took that picture at D1....
so most fo the cars that were there were probably cars that drifted.... so they really dont care about uneven wear..... and i guess it would be easier for them to get the cars sideways with only 60% of the tire being on the road.
so most fo the cars that were there were probably cars that drifted.... so they really dont care about uneven wear..... and i guess it would be easier for them to get the cars sideways with only 60% of the tire being on the road.
03-04 Cobra 12.9 Stock quarter mile .... Just different pullies get you low 12's high 11's.
350Z Stock 13.5ish. So, if you had a avg Cobra driver and a awesome Z driver with good traction from the dig.... maybe a win.
However, put that driver in a Cobra he'll beat the Z almost everytime.
If the Z wasn't so close stk to stk in 1/4 mile times I'd say Cobra would always win.... But, there is the chance a Z could beat one in a race here and there.
As far as the wheels and tires combo thing. I'm too old school I guess and go by the 80% radial rule where the rim is supposed to be 80 of the tire for best ride and performance. I think with todays tires I'm more like 90% rule. In other words, I like a half inch over a 10 inch rim on the inside and outside. That not only looks right to me but works as a rim protector as well.
Personally, I didn't like the look of that Z at all. I wonder if it rubs a lot at the track? It looks really close to me.
350Z Stock 13.5ish. So, if you had a avg Cobra driver and a awesome Z driver with good traction from the dig.... maybe a win.
However, put that driver in a Cobra he'll beat the Z almost everytime.
If the Z wasn't so close stk to stk in 1/4 mile times I'd say Cobra would always win.... But, there is the chance a Z could beat one in a race here and there.
As far as the wheels and tires combo thing. I'm too old school I guess and go by the 80% radial rule where the rim is supposed to be 80 of the tire for best ride and performance. I think with todays tires I'm more like 90% rule. In other words, I like a half inch over a 10 inch rim on the inside and outside. That not only looks right to me but works as a rim protector as well.
Personally, I didn't like the look of that Z at all. I wonder if it rubs a lot at the track? It looks really close to me.
Last edited by Z_Driver; Jan 7, 2008 at 10:48 PM.
Originally Posted by Z_Driver
03-04 Cobra 12.9 Stock quarter mile .... Just different pullies get you low 12's high 11's.
350Z Stock 13.5ish. So, if you had a avg Cobra driver and a awesome Z driver with good traction from the dig.... maybe a win.
However, put that driver in a Cobra he'll beat the Z almost everytime.
If the Z wasn't so close stk to stk in 1/4 mile times I'd say Cobra would always win.... But, there is the chance a Z could beat one in a race here and there.
350Z Stock 13.5ish. So, if you had a avg Cobra driver and a awesome Z driver with good traction from the dig.... maybe a win.
However, put that driver in a Cobra he'll beat the Z almost everytime.
If the Z wasn't so close stk to stk in 1/4 mile times I'd say Cobra would always win.... But, there is the chance a Z could beat one in a race here and there.
It's also very easy to make more power out of a Cobra.... spend like 5 grand and your in the 520+HP Range.
Originally Posted by phat04350z
Talk about uneven wear and horrible handling. The more center of the tire you have on the ground the better then handling. So now we can say this is dangerous and provides no performance feel or improvement
Originally Posted by AlexBG
True... once in a while but most Cobra's are not Stock these days.
It's also very easy to make more power out of a Cobra.... spend like 5 grand and your in the 520+HP Range.
It's also very easy to make more power out of a Cobra.... spend like 5 grand and your in the 520+HP Range.
For the drags I'll take my 67 Camaro though. Much cheaper faster and easy to get parts for.
Originally Posted by Z_Driver
I'm right with you on this. I love my Z for what it is..... I great handling and fast sports car. But, it is a lot cheaper and easier to set up a Mustang Cobra of those years for the track.
For the drags I'll take my 67 Camaro though. Much cheaper faster and easy to get parts for.
For the drags I'll take my 67 Camaro though. Much cheaper faster and easy to get parts for.
Well like i posted on SVTP
I've ran GT's 99-06 all of the races were Highway Roll Races.
I guess they were stock GT's tho.
They get a jump on me but i come and catch them top end and put a car or so on them.
Me and a friend of mine he owns a 04 Cobra .... he owned me on the straights .... i owned him around the turns.
so i guess both cars have their pros and cons
I guess they were stock GT's tho.
They get a jump on me but i come and catch them top end and put a car or so on them.
Me and a friend of mine he owns a 04 Cobra .... he owned me on the straights .... i owned him around the turns.
so i guess both cars have their pros and cons
i got put like 5 or 6 Car lengths on the highway races from the 04 Cobra
He couldn't keep up around the turns and called me telling me to slow down because he almost wrecked.
my friend still gave me props for the Highway races .. because for a V6 with no power adder he didnt put that bad of a hurting on me.
Last edited by AlexBG; Jan 7, 2008 at 10:56 PM.
Originally Posted by AlexBG
I used to own a mustang
so i check up once in a while on SVTperformance.com
here is the thread i found ....
i guess they dont know what the meaning on stretched tires is.
http://www.svtperformance.com/forums...d.php?t=449384
so i check up once in a while on SVTperformance.com
here is the thread i found ....
i guess they dont know what the meaning on stretched tires is.
http://www.svtperformance.com/forums...d.php?t=449384
haha all those cars they posted up are fuking sick. great fitment.
I think there's no point ******* on something that isn't your style or is just different from what your used to.
To them... everthing is rice.
I think there's no point ******* on something that isn't your style or is just different from what your used to.
To them... everthing is rice.
Last edited by status:one; Jan 8, 2008 at 03:28 AM.
Originally Posted by Z_Driver
I thought positive camber was a plus on the track? Many auto crossers / road racers set the suspension up just that way for handling. It's not good for the street because you not on it 100% of the time but, that the track it makes a big difference. For these guy though it's to fit inside the wheel well and maybe look like they are race ready imo.







