Fifth Gear: Latest Nissan 350Z vs Latest Mazda RX-8 (August 18th, 2008)
08-20-2008, 11:41 PM
#41
Sponsor
Works Concepts
Works Concepts
Originally Posted by New JerZ
It'd be interesting if they tested the Z against an EVO X or a STI.
08-21-2008, 12:05 AM
#42
Yes again we are seeing this comparison. I personlly took the seat of my a$$ test before purchasing my 3rd Z car. While I like many of the things about the RX8 some things were just enough to steer my to another Z car.
4 seater
1st gear is soo very tiny, you just end up shifting almost instantly
the engine lacks a torque feeling
the prices were about the same for enthusiast and the RX6 in 05
nice car don't get me wrong, just a sweeter ride and more power with the Z.
4 seater
1st gear is soo very tiny, you just end up shifting almost instantly
the engine lacks a torque feeling
the prices were about the same for enthusiast and the RX6 in 05
nice car don't get me wrong, just a sweeter ride and more power with the Z.
08-21-2008, 03:42 AM
#43
Banned
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Fairfax, VA
Posts: 2,637
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by ish06FairladyZ
a simple answer...
http://autotropolis.com/wiki/index.php?title=Horsepower
http://autotropolis.com/wiki/index.php?title=Horsepower
Thank you for this!Everyone who is asking:
BHP (brake horse power) - the power an engine produces without power robbing components like transmission, water pump, gear box etc.
SAE (our horse power rating) - the power an engine produces at the flywheel, including all power robbing components.
08-21-2008, 07:29 AM
#47
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Boise, Idaho
Posts: 1,695
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Faboo
who said anything about a v6/v8?????
2.3L turbo 4 from the mazdaspeed3. 270hp/280trq
2.3L turbo 4 from the mazdaspeed3. 270hp/280trq
08-21-2008, 09:53 AM
#48
Registered User
Originally Posted by Silver_Z33
I thought the mazdaspeed3 was 263hp? Either way, i heard those cars are pretty quick. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gDyl6s9UYPQi dont know if the Z wasnt really getting on the gas or that car keeps up with the Z, it doesnt say if the mazda is stock but i figured i'd throw it up here. not gonna lie it kinda makes me sick lol
For those that are against street racing, it's at a track for your piece of mind.
08-21-2008, 01:23 PM
#49
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: new york
Posts: 163
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by RedLine 350z
I have an stock 03 Z. My brother has a stock 06 MSP3. We were both neck to neck except the gearing of my car would last longer than his. He would shift before his redline then I would shift about .5 sec after him. When he shifts, his car would be a 1/4 car length behind mine due to mine still in gear.
For those that are against street racing, it's at a track for your piece of mind.
For those that are against street racing, it's at a track for your piece of mind.
08-21-2008, 01:57 PM
#50
New Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Wild Wild West
Posts: 3,096
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by RedLine 350z
I have an stock 03 Z. My brother has a stock 06 MSP3. We were both neck to neck except the gearing of my car would last longer than his. He would shift before his redline then I would shift about .5 sec after him. When he shifts, his car would be a 1/4 car length behind mine due to mine still in gear.
j/k.
08-21-2008, 05:28 PM
#51
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 168
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by h2kSPiG
If Mazda was smart they would take their best engine, 2.3L turbo, and put it in their "best" sports car, the RX-8. That would be a much more reliable and all around better car.
The Z was meant to the a cheap "jack of all trades". Handle pretty well, have good power, still be reasonably functional for what it is, but isn't excellent in any one category. Most other cars anywhere near the price range lack one thing or another completely.
The RX-8 may have better utility with its back seat and fold door things, but the engine is not nearly as powerful or reliable as it needs to be. It is just different in its design.
The Z was meant to the a cheap "jack of all trades". Handle pretty well, have good power, still be reasonably functional for what it is, but isn't excellent in any one category. Most other cars anywhere near the price range lack one thing or another completely.
The RX-8 may have better utility with its back seat and fold door things, but the engine is not nearly as powerful or reliable as it needs to be. It is just different in its design.
08-21-2008, 10:42 PM
#52
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Boise, Idaho
Posts: 1,274
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by KManZ
Thank you for this!Everyone who is asking:
BHP (brake horse power) - the power an engine produces without power robbing components like transmission, water pump, gear box etc.
SAE (our horse power rating) - the power an engine produces at the flywheel, including all power robbing components.
Originally Posted by YOGURT!
awesome quote.. The "jack of all trades" is what I tell everyone that asks me about the Z.. it does everything well, but nothing perfect.
Last edited by gregom; 08-21-2008 at 10:45 PM.
08-26-2008, 09:13 AM
#54
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Earth
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
That would kill the dynamics of the car, the Rotaries big advantage is packaging and weight. The engine it self is about the size of a bowling ball bag and weighs about 60% that of a 4 cylinder and 40% of a 6. This allows a mid engine design and low, lightweight.
Mazda does need to kick up the HP the X16 is said to be around 270 to 280 hp but this is not fact.
It is interesting that the RX only lost by a second while giving 81 hp to the Z. Says a lot for the RX's superior dynamics and handling.
Mazda does need to kick up the HP the X16 is said to be around 270 to 280 hp but this is not fact.
It is interesting that the RX only lost by a second while giving 81 hp to the Z. Says a lot for the RX's superior dynamics and handling.
Originally Posted by h2kSPiG
If Mazda was smart they would take their best engine, 2.3L turbo, and put it in their "best" sports car, the RX-8. That would be a much more reliable and all around better car.
The Z was meant to the a cheap "jack of all trades". Handle pretty well, have good power, still be reasonably functional for what it is, but isn't excellent in any one category. Most other cars anywhere near the price range lack one thing or another completely.
The RX-8 may have better utility with its back seat and fold door things, but the engine is not nearly as powerful or reliable as it needs to be. It is just different in its design.
The Z was meant to the a cheap "jack of all trades". Handle pretty well, have good power, still be reasonably functional for what it is, but isn't excellent in any one category. Most other cars anywhere near the price range lack one thing or another completely.
The RX-8 may have better utility with its back seat and fold door things, but the engine is not nearly as powerful or reliable as it needs to be. It is just different in its design.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
hardkicks
Zs & Gs For Sale
0
09-20-2015 12:28 PM
EnjukuRacing
Engine
0
09-11-2015 08:30 AM
