Notices
2003-2009 Nissan 350Z

Would a Z be more fun to drive with a turbo 4?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 27, 2009 | 05:49 PM
  #1  
blazed54's Avatar
blazed54
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 946
Likes: 0
From: Hawaii
Default Would a Z be more fun to drive with a turbo 4?

Hey, I'd just like to start off by saying that although I am 23 and have been driving for 7 years, I have only once ridden in a boosted car (none of my friends have boost). That was an old friend's WRX about 4 years ago and I remember it being AMAZINGLY fun even though it's slower than my car now. When I bought my Z new in '07, I didn't even bother test driving a single other car because I knew I wanted a Z haha.

To those of you who're like me and bought the Z over an STI and EVO cause the Z is way sexier, do you love the NA V6 power or do you think the Z would be more fun with a turbo 4 like the STI and EVO engines? I don't mean in modability or power output, cause they are equally fast stock, but in the way the power is delivered and the sound and pull of a boosted engine.

Thx for any input and sorry if this topic has been discussed before.
Reply
Old Aug 27, 2009 | 06:21 PM
  #2  
davidv's Avatar
davidv
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 42,753
Likes: 11
From: Tucson, AZ
Default

You mean Nissan 370Z goes to a turcbo 4 cylinder and makes the same horsepower?

Technically possible but doubt Nissan will do it. Naturally aspirated VQ motor is bullit proof and cross platform - used in other vehicles. Why mess with a good thing. If Nissan is going to test reliability of a turbo 4 hope they do not do it in a Z.
Reply
Old Aug 27, 2009 | 06:28 PM
  #3  
Gibbs's Avatar
Gibbs
Know it all
Premier Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 695
Likes: 1
From: Dallas (Colleyville), Texas
Default

What's a turbo 4?
Reply
Old Aug 27, 2009 | 07:00 PM
  #4  
*Boose*'s Avatar
*Boose*
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,447
Likes: 0
From: Rapid City, SD Ellsworth AFB
Default

Originally Posted by Gibbs
What's a turbo 4?
4 cyl. I think it wouldn't be Z anymore. Kind of what BMW is going to do with the new M's. I love V6 power over turbo 4cyl though. The added displacement contributes to the benefits. To me a lot of people opt out of the Z and into Evo's and STI's even C5's because of simple bolt on potential.
Reply
Old Aug 27, 2009 | 07:39 PM
  #5  
blazed54's Avatar
blazed54
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 946
Likes: 0
From: Hawaii
Default

yes I mean turbo 4 cylinder and as far as HP goes I believe the STI and EVO both make 300 hp or very close to it. The STI also has more torque than the Z right?
Reply
Old Aug 27, 2009 | 07:44 PM
  #6  
ChromiumBlue's Avatar
ChromiumBlue
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 146
Likes: 0
From: Houston
Default

i think it may be worth it. someone else chime in if i'm wrong, but i dont think 4 cylinder engines, boosted or not, push very hard at all once you pass the 110 mph marker. high speeds are important to me and i want an engine that can give me some go when i need to make a quick jump from 80 to 100 which is what bigger engines tend to give from my experience. of course the lighter weight and bolt ons make the 4 cylinder appealing too though
Reply
Old Aug 27, 2009 | 09:06 PM
  #7  
_Donovan_'s Avatar
_Donovan_
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 356
Likes: 0
From: U. S. A.(PA, MD, AZ) / Romania
Default

What about a "turbo 6"
Reply
Old Aug 27, 2009 | 09:16 PM
  #8  
quiksilver38's Avatar
quiksilver38
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 2,332
Likes: 1
From: Portland, OR
Default

^yea straight six turbo ftw
Reply
Old Aug 27, 2009 | 10:57 PM
  #9  
zettahertz's Avatar
zettahertz
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 422
Likes: 0
From: San Mateo
Default

A factory turbo like in the 300ZX would be nice. ability to add power to turbo engines is much more cost effective than NA. And if desired, you can go E85 conversion and tune and get over 400whp.
Reply
Old Aug 28, 2009 | 05:22 AM
  #10  
BillyGoatGag's Avatar
BillyGoatGag
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 36
Likes: 0
From: Trier, Deutschland
Default

What exactly about turbo builds are cost effective? The 400hp on a turbo build is a lot different than 400hp on an NA. Sure, you can get higher numbers, but who really needs 800hp?

Greddy TT kit - $5k
Rebuilt engine - $8k
Labor and incidentals - $5k

You're talking about dropping in a four cylinder with boost? Why? The only worthy contender I can think of would be a SR20DET. The 4G63 is not even Nissan, although it is fabulous. If you really wanted to, you could pick up a VG, but why put that type of weight into an already heavy ride?

Ultimately it all depends on your budget! What do you want to spend? I've always been told bolt on turbo kits are reliable up to about 400 HP on the internally stock VQ. I know there are threads on here that provide more details on that. Unless you are willing to spend a great deal for FI done RIGHT, you probably won't be happy with the results.

-Clay
Reply
Old Aug 28, 2009 | 07:19 AM
  #11  
PerfZ's Avatar
PerfZ
New Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 2,402
Likes: 14
From: hilliard ohio
Default

The Z is a 6 cylinder - always has been, always should be, whether turbo or not. End of story.
Reply
Old Aug 28, 2009 | 08:04 AM
  #12  
QNman's Avatar
QNman
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 337
Likes: 0
From: St Louis, MO
Default

Originally Posted by PerfZ
The Z is a 6 cylinder - always has been, always should be, whether turbo or not. End of story.
Reply
Old Aug 28, 2009 | 08:16 AM
  #13  
binder's Avatar
binder
New Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 6,457
Likes: 7
From: terre haute, IN; STL, MO
Default

does nissan make any turbo charged vehicles anymore?

There isn't an option probably because of the r&d involved.
Reply
Old Aug 28, 2009 | 10:05 AM
  #14  
Flick Montana's Avatar
Flick Montana
New Member
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 9,743
Likes: 3
From: Indiana
Default

Turbo 6 or bust. I'm not driving some horrible turbo 4 around. The last one I had made enough noise to give you a headache just going to the store.
Reply
Old Aug 28, 2009 | 11:14 AM
  #15  
QNman's Avatar
QNman
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 337
Likes: 0
From: St Louis, MO
Default

I guess my answer to the OP is... I would personally prefer a NA-6 over a turbo-4 in any vehicle.
Reply
Old Aug 28, 2009 | 11:36 AM
  #16  
audisyr's Avatar
audisyr
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 138
Likes: 0
From: North Jersey
Default

I always hated the fact that audi changed the b5 s4 from a v6tt to a straight 8. Back in the day I enjoyed the susceptibility of the stock turbo in my 99 a4 to aftermarket tweaking. Boost is a great thing
Reply
Old Aug 28, 2009 | 11:38 AM
  #17  
mavtais's Avatar
mavtais
Registered User
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,074
Likes: 0
From: CentralCal - Fresno
Default

The Z was tuned for mid-range power. A turbo 4-cyl gasoline engine would be most likely tuned for top end power. Personally, I like top end power better on the track, but mid-range is good for street and auto-x. I think the Z would need to lose some weight (like 200 lbs) if you wanted an effective turbo 4-cyl setup.
Reply
Old Aug 28, 2009 | 12:44 PM
  #18  
350ZthatsMe's Avatar
350ZthatsMe
Registered User
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 197
Likes: 0
From: Bay Area
Default

if you're taking exact same HP and no intentions of modding I would go w/ all motor... no turbo lag and less maintenance..
Reply
Old Aug 28, 2009 | 01:18 PM
  #20  
Zolid's Avatar
Zolid
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 278
Likes: 0
From: MN
Default

the Z's too big for a turbo 4, but a turbo 6 on the other hand

Originally Posted by binder
does nissan make any turbo charged vehicles anymore?
you cant be serious

Last edited by Zolid; Aug 28, 2009 at 01:20 PM.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:04 AM.