why would anyone admit to being a honda enthusiast? i sure wouldnt if i was lol

 

Why wouldnt they? Honda makes good cars and they have a big community, (although their newer cars have lost their magic)

OP, I would look into a newer 350z (07+) with the HR engine since it makes more power, and avoid the base models because they dont have TCS or a limited slip diff. I would also avoid the NISMO unless you want the ricey body kit.

 

sorry i jus hate honda and cant stand them lol

 

They make a great product just like the majority of Japanese vehicle manufacturers. It's fine if you dislike the people that drive them because many of them are indeed odd , but I'm curious as to your reasoning concerning why you hate Honda itself.

OP, buy a Z. 2007+ If you want to keep it relatively stock, 2005- if you want to mod the **** out of it. Parts are cheap for the DE platform and quite abundant, not so much yet for the HR. If you have the coin go for the 370, but a NISMO is just not worth it unless you go drooly over the body kit.

 

saywat!

I say what too you bro!

due to the price of a honda the wrong hands have gotting a hold of them...

I'm still a honda lover at heart!

if I could find an alright frame I'd be flying pass your a$$ in a '91 CRX Si by two or more car lenghts...

FACT

HONDAs are great cars, as of late not really....

get a Z OP you won't regret.... a used 07/08 for under $22,500 is the best bang for the buck on the market with out looking like a flying brick i.e. WRX/EVO

 

get a Z.

 

I'd like to hear why, if you don't mind...

 

maybe i said it wrong. its actually the ricers that own them that think their bad *** in them i hate.

 

Gotcha...

those same "ricers" can be found in Z's as well, though, not that I'm breaking any news or anything.

 

the difference tho is honda ricrs have these slow *** rides and think its fast or something. like they truly believe their cars are the bomb cept the sleeper ones. the z ricers unfortunately have bad taste but they got the z motor lol. so its like slow ricers vs fast ricers lol

 

I do not see this guy coming back to post, but......


NSX...wasnt the nsx the 1st vtec powered car? I think it was.

NSX has the same motor that the Acura CL 3.2 has. Just worked up a tad diff.

I have 2 customers with NSX's and i like driving them. The one guy is "6,7" and all he did was put in some racing seats to accommodate him. And i believe they were under 2 g's. Besides if you get the Z and start to "hook" it up i am 100% positive that you'll be spending 2g's regardless.

All in all its up to you. Get the NSX to scratch a # off your Bucket list. Get the Z so we don't read your complaints about getting an NSX.

If you do get the Z let me be the 1st to welcome you.

 

i love hondas and my dream car is an nsx as well. but its just too old for the price. i almost got an rsx instead of my z but im def glad i didnt. this is my first z and it sure as hell wont be my last

 

once you go RWD - you wont go back..

GL OP

 

If he's a Honda guy, I'm sure he's well aware of an RSX.

 

Not Necessarily. He's a HONDA enthusiast not an ACURA enthusiast sillyboy! BIG DIFFERENCE.

 

What is the difference?...............Honda makes Acura, and they all have the same Engines.

Honda Odyssey 3.2----Acura TL 3.2 -------NSX 3.2 Stick, and 3.0 Auto 3.0 shares with the accord! OooooooHHhhhh

Honda Accord 3.5------Acura TL 3.5
Honda Accord 2.4------Acura TSX 2.4
Civic si 2.0 ------------Acura RSX 2.0
Only diff is the RDX 2.3 comes Turbo!

 

Cha-cha real smooth... cha-cha AGAIN! HANDS ON YOUR KNEES! HANDS ON YOUR KNEES!

 

Btw Kacz...that Borla you sold Greg is to short for the G. So i have to add 2 extensions 1 on each side to make it the length. No problems though.

Have to start from the rear to front and add either b4 or after the H pipe.

 

Teh ***?!? you serious?

 

VQ35DE kills any every honda Ive ever onwed. HR would be a bonus. From what I understand the 370 isnt THAT much faster for the buck. Dont have first hand experience though. hmmm... *off to youtube