Notices
2003-2009 Nissan 350Z

'11 STi vs E46 M3 vs. 350z

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 12, 2011 | 06:37 AM
  #61  
Dr. Venture's Avatar
Dr. Venture
Registered User
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,697
Likes: 3
From: Dirty Jersey
Default

if it is this hard to decide, just use the 38k for taxi's.
Reply
Old Jul 12, 2011 | 10:30 AM
  #62  
J 0 K 3 R's Avatar
J 0 K 3 R
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 683
Likes: 2
From: LA, CA
Default

if your a hipster that likes your dumb friends to pile into your immature looking car and disrespect everything they can from door sills to carpet get the corolla with a bodykit i mean the 38000!$ subaru. wtf they used to be 33! if you want to spend 38k on a used car and its repairs get a m3 that the careless owner thrashed for 6 years without changing the oil.
or get a good looking reliable reasonably priced rwd v6 true sports car that CAN be upgraded unlike 2litre turbo 4bangers. if you have money to get a new sti the choice is pretty obvious get a 370z, look at some of the lowered 370s with rims here on the forum they look incredible. its smaller than the 350 more powerful, better trans, has warranty and honestly really grew on me, it does take time its very aggressive. nismo looks crazy cool.
Reply
Old Jul 12, 2011 | 10:37 AM
  #63  
pcressey's Avatar
pcressey
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 469
Likes: 0
From: California
Default



I am guessing he is over it...
Reply
Old Jul 14, 2011 | 10:12 AM
  #64  
EmpireDude's Avatar
EmpireDude
Vendor - Former Vendor
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 615
Likes: 0
From: 937 Ohio
Default

Originally Posted by scotts300
The HR Zs do not get 20mpg on an average tank. Our 03' and 04' do, but not our 07'. Same drivers, same commute, same gas - 20% less fuel efficiency at least.

And OP - why are you willing to consider a used M3 but not a used ABC car (STI/Evo)? An Evo8 is bad***, and will run $20k MAX. Give me $20k and tell me to buy a single car for all-around use (commute, groceries, track, autox, night out, etc.), and that's where my money goes.
depending on the accuracy of the inboard mpg calculator, I'm averaging 21-22 between city and highway in my 2008. If they are known to be really inaccurate then disregard my statement.
Reply
Old Jul 14, 2011 | 10:59 AM
  #65  
350ztttt's Avatar
350ztttt
Registered User
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 800
Likes: 2
From: Solon, Ohio
Default

Originally Posted by redzblackh
Don't matter which one u get, the mod bug is gonna bite ya, get the Z, best bang for muck and you'll get more out of your mods
I know this is an older post on this thread...but what?? Downpipe on an sti will get you more power than exhaust tp's and intake on a z lol (trust me, had a ms6 and the z, i know!!). The z will probably give you the LEAST out of hyour mods!.....but only cuz it's already perfect
Reply
Old Jul 14, 2011 | 04:09 PM
  #66  
SchismX's Avatar
SchismX
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,087
Likes: 1
From: Germany
Default

Originally Posted by J 0 K 3 R
if your a hipster that likes your dumb friends to pile into your immature looking car and disrespect everything they can from door sills to carpet get the corolla with a bodykit i mean the 38000!$ subaru. wtf they used to be 33! if you want to spend 38k on a used car and its repairs get a m3 that the careless owner thrashed for 6 years without changing the oil.
or get a good looking reliable reasonably priced rwd v6 true sports car that CAN be upgraded unlike 2litre turbo 4bangers. if you have money to get a new sti the choice is pretty obvious get a 370z, look at some of the lowered 370s with rims here on the forum they look incredible. its smaller than the 350 more powerful, better trans, has warranty and honestly really grew on me, it does take time its very aggressive. nismo looks crazy cool.
That made me lol.

An sti or evo responds a lot better to upgrades than a Z, getting more bang for your buck. You are very misinformed.

Last edited by SchismX; Jul 14, 2011 at 10:09 PM.
Reply
Old Jul 15, 2011 | 01:18 PM
  #67  
J 0 K 3 R's Avatar
J 0 K 3 R
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 683
Likes: 2
From: LA, CA
Default

Originally Posted by SchismX
That made me lol.

An sti or evo responds a lot better to upgrades than a Z, getting more bang for your buck. You are very misinformed.
do you know anything about motors? or cars? how do you come up with that sh!#, 3.5 litre vs a 2.0 or 2.5 litre. put the BEST internals on both of them, they will be the same strenghth wise. then put the biggest turbo you can on them both, if the turbos are anywhere near the same size and boost the 3 litre will make more power der.
im not talking autozone filter upgrades kid. obviously a car with a turbo will benefit more from an intake.
misinformed? how do you figure any of this anyway, troll maybe, the sti and evo make 300 hp WITH a turbo! sti is pushing 14.5 lbs boost and a stock evo is at 19 PSI!! and still has less power than my stock z. run 1half that psi on a 16g turbo in a 350z and it will make 400+ hp. over 600 with 19psi.
yes the z will cost more to upgrade because it is not a cheap 4cyl aimed at kids in their late teens that know nothing about cars except that it matches their favorite baseball hat or basketball jersey.
Reply
Old Jul 15, 2011 | 01:32 PM
  #68  
Dr. Venture's Avatar
Dr. Venture
Registered User
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,697
Likes: 3
From: Dirty Jersey
Default

Originally Posted by J 0 K 3 R
do you know anything about motors? or cars? how do you come up with that sh!#, 3.5 litre vs a 2.0 or 2.5 litre. put the BEST internals on both of them, they will be the same strenghth wise. then put the biggest turbo you can on them both, if the turbos are anywhere near the same size and boost the 3 litre will make more power der.
im not talking autozone filter upgrades kid. obviously a car with a turbo will benefit more from an intake.
misinformed? how do you figure any of this anyway, troll maybe, the sti and evo make 300 hp WITH a turbo! sti is pushing 14.5 lbs boost and a stock evo is at 19 PSI!! and still has less power than my stock z. run 1half that psi on a 16g turbo in a 350z and it will make 400+ hp. over 600 with 19psi.
yes the z will cost more to upgrade because it is not a cheap 4cyl aimed at kids in their late teens that know nothing about cars except that it matches their favorite baseball hat or basketball jersey.
what i think the previous guy meant was that in order to have the Z perform like the sti and evo performance wise it would take more $ to do so than it would on the sti and or evo once upgrades were being done even though stock vs stock #'s are close.

btw owning an 05 sti and then an 06 evo ix just a simple $40.00 manual boost controller installed allowed me to blow away my Z with extensive bolt ons...YES do to the turbo. which in my eyes it is a wonder why nissan never just stocked it with a turbo from the get go. and then i have to come to realize that my engine is shared with almost every other nissan on the road. Sad days when a maxima can keep up.

Last edited by Dr. Venture; Jul 15, 2011 at 01:44 PM.
Reply
Old Jul 15, 2011 | 01:47 PM
  #69  
mr. sparco's Avatar
mr. sparco
New Member
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 7,090
Likes: 460
From: Sunny Beaches
Default

Originally Posted by J 0 K 3 R
or get a good looking reliable reasonably priced rwd v6 true sports car that CAN be upgraded unlike 2litre turbo 4bangers.
I always thought of the 350z more as a cruiser than a true sports car. Not so sure about the 4 banger vs v6 comment, the Evo with a drop in filter with exhaust and the little 2liter is at 300 awhp. Then again what do I know, I just own both cars.
Reply
Old Jul 15, 2011 | 01:57 PM
  #70  
J 0 K 3 R's Avatar
J 0 K 3 R
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 683
Likes: 2
From: LA, CA
Default

Originally Posted by Dr. Venture
what i think the previous guy meant was that in order to have the Z perform like the sti and evo performance wise it would take more $ to do so than it would on the sti and or evo once upgrades were being done even though stock vs stock #'s are close.

btw owning an 05 sti and then an 06 evo ix just a simple $40.00 manual boost controller installed allowed me to blow away my Z with extensive bolt ons...YES do to the turbo. which in my eyes it is a wonder why nissan never just stocked it with a turbo from the get go. and then i have to come to realize that my engine is shared with almost every other nissan on the road. Sad days when a maxima can keep up.
then you know if you put a turbo on the z it would be way faster than the evo.
Reply
Old Jul 15, 2011 | 02:09 PM
  #71  
INTIMAZY's Avatar
INTIMAZY
New Member
15 Year Member
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 929
Likes: 5
From: Staten Island / NYC
Default

Originally Posted by J 0 K 3 R
then you know if you put a turbo on the z it would be way faster than the evo.
Dollar for dollar, a factory FI car will usually outgain a factory NA car.

This is especially true for turbo cars with iron blocks
It's the reason why I jumped on the 2JZ/1JZ bandwagon. Much cheaper (and usually more reliable) to get power out of a car already built for boost.
Reply
Old Jul 15, 2011 | 02:13 PM
  #72  
Entaille's Avatar
Entaille
New Member
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 9,043
Likes: 21
From: WA
Default

^truth. I put 2k in to my 2011 wrx and I went from 235whp to 300whp. torque gained even more going all the way up to 330tq.

in my z, I put about 3k into mods (all basic n/a bolt ons, short of headers, and an osiris tune) and I gained a total of 20whp.

bang for the buck, factory fi'ed cars are for the win. obviously, if you go to town on an n/a build and turn it into an fi field, it's a different beast, and will also cost you a lot more .. : P
Reply
Old Jul 15, 2011 | 02:38 PM
  #73  
Dr. Venture's Avatar
Dr. Venture
Registered User
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,697
Likes: 3
From: Dirty Jersey
Default

Originally Posted by J 0 K 3 R
then you know if you put a turbo on the z it would be way faster than the evo.

stock vs stock then turbo the z #'s wise yes. but it is not like you will be rabbit against turtle.

in the long run an engine designed for fi will always out weigh an engine designed for NA when FI is introduced. simple facts are in the designs. and the upgrades always favor the engine designed for FI. Remember stock vs stock. now if you add the internal upgrades for the z to be able to withstand more power then that is a diff story. But sticking to the COST of upgrading between the 3 engines, unless you plan to win racing trophies or play Toretto's role it is not worth it. Also throw in the AWD capabilities...save that for a rainy day. IM OUT!

Last edited by Dr. Venture; Jul 15, 2011 at 02:48 PM.
Reply
Old Jul 15, 2011 | 02:42 PM
  #74  
Daddy116's Avatar
Daddy116
Newbie
Premier Member
 
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 103
Likes: 0
From: Poughkeepsie NY
Default

E36 ftw!
Reply
Old Jul 15, 2011 | 05:02 PM
  #75  
SchismX's Avatar
SchismX
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,087
Likes: 1
From: Germany
Default

Originally Posted by J 0 K 3 R
do you know anything about motors? or cars? how do you come up with that sh!#, 3.5 litre vs a 2.0 or 2.5 litre. put the BEST internals on both of them, they will be the same strenghth wise. then put the biggest turbo you can on them both, if the turbos are anywhere near the same size and boost the 3 litre will make more power der.
im not talking autozone filter upgrades kid. obviously a car with a turbo will benefit more from an intake.
misinformed? how do you figure any of this anyway, troll maybe, the sti and evo make 300 hp WITH a turbo! sti is pushing 14.5 lbs boost and a stock evo is at 19 PSI!! and still has less power than my stock z. run 1half that psi on a 16g turbo in a 350z and it will make 400+ hp. over 600 with 19psi.
yes the z will cost more to upgrade because it is not a cheap 4cyl aimed at kids in their late teens that know nothing about cars except that it matches their favorite baseball hat or basketball jersey.
lol. If we were talking about built motors you might be right, but we're not... The big reason a Z can make more power on less boost is its higher compression motor. I guess you really misunderstood what I was getting at. Seems that everyone else understood me but you.

P.S., I'm not a kid.

Last edited by SchismX; Jul 15, 2011 at 05:37 PM.
Reply
Old Jul 15, 2011 | 05:16 PM
  #76  
twitch579's Avatar
twitch579
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 940
Likes: 0
From: Florida
Default

Forget the rice....2005 Vette FTW!
Reply
Old Jul 19, 2011 | 03:47 AM
  #77  
Dr. Venture's Avatar
Dr. Venture
Registered User
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,697
Likes: 3
From: Dirty Jersey
Default

^ i'd rather get an evo. More fun to drive plus a lil upgrading craps on vettes.
Reply
Old Aug 24, 2011 | 01:40 PM
  #78  
zeebrah's Avatar
zeebrah
Registered User
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 207
Likes: 0
From: royal palm beach florida
Default

350z
Reply
Old Aug 24, 2011 | 02:03 PM
  #79  
pcressey's Avatar
pcressey
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 469
Likes: 0
From: California
Default

^--- Well put. Definitely worth the 35+ day bump.
Reply
Old Aug 24, 2011 | 03:41 PM
  #80  
Itzcashew's Avatar
Itzcashew
Registered User
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 1,421
Likes: 0
From: Houston
Default

Buy a USED G35 sedan with a 6spd.

Its not a cop magnet, it has backseats, it doesn't cost that much, its RWD, and really it's still a Nissan and you have worked on tons of Nissan so why not keep it in the family?
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:37 PM.