Notices
Intake Exhaust Moving all that air in and out efficiently

BACKPRESSURE MYTH DESTROYED. I believe this is TRUTH.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 31, 2012 | 08:43 PM
  #1  
Tigre's Avatar
Tigre
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
From: Orlando
Default BACKPRESSURE MYTH DESTROYED. I believe this is TRUTH.

http://www.team-integra.net/forum/bl...st-basics.html

A great read and it was basically a deciding factor for me to have a muffler delete done rather than have a flowmaster installed. F**k the muffler!

What do you think of this? I believe it is true, everything is logical and ties together rationally with the physics of sound waves and high-low pressure attraction. I don't have the time to delve further at the moment.

Sorry for the caps, was excited haha.

Last edited by Tigre; Oct 31, 2012 at 09:21 PM.
Reply
Old Oct 31, 2012 | 09:59 PM
  #2  
bmccann101's Avatar
bmccann101
350Z-holic
Premier Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 8,321
Likes: 467
From: Scottsdale/coyote drophouse
Default

Terry ( correct name? its late, im tired) at Motordyne is an ex rocket scientist... apparently locations for the bends of the pipe and its components even make a difference in the Z.
Dunno..
every car/engine/set up truly is different. I will attest to the fact by personal experience as well as countless testimony from others ..that large diameter pipes or too much flow on NA 350z certainly does not equate to useable power as torque, which is what you can equate to power that you can feel.
Just a thought, didnt even read the link provided.

Last edited by bmccann101; Oct 31, 2012 at 10:10 PM.
Reply
Old Oct 31, 2012 | 10:00 PM
  #3  
Arvin89's Avatar
Arvin89
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 785
Likes: 0
From: Vancouver
Default

Interesting read. But i suggest you read it again as i think you missed the main point of the 2nd last paragraph.

"This would be another one for the Magazine Mechanics. "This muffler will reduce backpressure and you'll see at least 15-20HP with this ultimate free flowing design!" By now I hope we can see what a big fat load of crap that is. In the stock exhaust system, the pulses have already been jammed together, and the backpressure has already affected the engine. So you change your muffler to a better flowing one, so what? The amount of backpressure in the exhaust system remains unchanged. You're just putting a fire hose at the end of a garden hose, the flow remains unchanged. So unless your exhaust has reduced backpressure enough so that the muffler becomes a restriction, then changing the muffler to a "free flowing" design will have no effect on real-world performance."


So a muffler delete is pointless. Is what its saying.
Reply
Old Oct 31, 2012 | 10:11 PM
  #4  
bmccann101's Avatar
bmccann101
350Z-holic
Premier Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 8,321
Likes: 467
From: Scottsdale/coyote drophouse
Default

Yep. The mtdyn. Xyz pipe is titz... and that's why their test pipes are also worth four times the regular cost..I TRULY wish it were not the case.. but the theory behind waves etc makes a difference in vq Turbo cams...intake runners and most certainly our exhaust too
Reply
Old Oct 31, 2012 | 10:49 PM
  #5  
Tigre's Avatar
Tigre
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
From: Orlando
Default

Originally Posted by Arvin89
Interesting read. But i suggest you read it again as i think you missed the main point of the 2nd last paragraph.

"This would be another one for the Magazine Mechanics. "This muffler will reduce backpressure and you'll see at least 15-20HP with this ultimate free flowing design!" By now I hope we can see what a big fat load of crap that is. In the stock exhaust system, the pulses have already been jammed together, and the backpressure has already affected the engine. So you change your muffler to a better flowing one, so what? The amount of backpressure in the exhaust system remains unchanged. You're just putting a fire hose at the end of a garden hose, the flow remains unchanged. So unless your exhaust has reduced backpressure enough so that the muffler becomes a restriction, then changing the muffler to a "free flowing" design will have no effect on real-world performance."


So a muffler delete is pointless. Is what its saying.
I think you misunderstood what the author was implying, that calling a muffler "free flowing" is a complete contradiction as the whole point of mufflers is to do the exact opposite of that in order to create destructive interference of the sound waves thereby reducing noise drastically.

I am deleting my muffler, not changing it. I'm taking out all that bouncing of exhaust pulses onto one another and allowing them to flow out nicely.


Originally Posted by bmccann101
Terry ( correct name? its late, im tired) at Motordyne is an ex rocket scientist... apparently locations for the bends of the pipe and its components even make a difference in the Z.
Dunno..
every car/engine/set up truly is different. I will attest to the fact by personal experience as well as countless testimony from others ..that large diameter pipes or too much flow on NA 350z certainly does not equate to useable power as torque, which is what you can equate to power that you can feel.
Just a thought, didnt even read the link provided.
Interesting...yeah I think the layout has more effect than people realize and I am not fond of the flowmaster taking what seems to be 90 degree angle turns through the exhaust path. That's why I'm doing mine custom with the pipes as straight as possible.

What you said is in the right mindset about exhaust flow, you should really skim over the article it goes into exactly how the diameter of the piping affects both N/A and F/I applications including at low and high RPM's. I am sticking with the stock pipe diameter (70mm outside diameter I've heard? So probably about 2 and a half inch inside) as I am assuming it is or is close to the most efficient diameter for providing the most efficient exhaust flow and therefore gains throughout the RPM range on N/A 350z's.

Last edited by Tigre; Oct 31, 2012 at 10:52 PM.
Reply
Old Nov 1, 2012 | 12:23 AM
  #6  
end of z world's Avatar
end of z world
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 797
Likes: 0
From: Twin Cities MN
Default

Was a great read. Thanks
Reply
Old Nov 1, 2012 | 03:59 AM
  #7  
350Zenophile's Avatar
350Zenophile
New Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 4,350
Likes: 4
From: USA
Default

Originally Posted by Tigre
I think you misunderstood what the author was implying, that calling a muffler "free flowing" is a complete contradiction as the whole point of mufflers is to do the exact opposite of that in order to create destructive interference of the sound waves thereby reducing noise drastically.

I am deleting my muffler, not changing it. I'm taking out all that bouncing of exhaust pulses onto one another and allowing them to flow out nicely.
I think Arvin understood...your plan to delete the muffler in effect creates the most free-flowing design, which the author of your post says is useless at the "end of the garden hose."

And there are other manufacturers out there that feature straight through designs if that is your primary concern.
Reply
Old Nov 1, 2012 | 04:10 AM
  #8  
Bret86944's Avatar
Bret86944
Registered User
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 529
Likes: 0
From: Cincinnati
Default

When I had an Integra I was on that forum every day. A lot of their articles are very well written. Very in-depth and technical.
Reply
Old Nov 1, 2012 | 04:16 AM
  #9  
Alberto's Avatar
Alberto
Cranky FI Owner
Premier Member
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 34,715
Likes: 8
From: DMV
Default

No muffler on a slow NA Z, good job repping our cars.

When a LEO pulls you over for sounding like an Elephant Queef you can explain the pulse theory to him.
Reply
Old Nov 1, 2012 | 04:50 AM
  #10  
Z33Garage's Avatar
Z33Garage
New Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 2,755
Likes: 26
From: Orlando
Default

^lmfao!
Reply
Old Nov 1, 2012 | 04:55 AM
  #11  
AllstarE4's Avatar
AllstarE4
Sleeps in 350Z
Premier Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,244
Likes: 4
From: Fort Worth, TX
Default

The writer of that article isn't giving you a definitive answer of "delete your muffler for winz!". He's merely explaining the process of exhaust gas flow and giving you an understanding of how too many people screw it up.

Basically, if your backpressure has already been optimized at a point before the muffler then you aren't gaining by deleting the muffler. You'll get noise, but not performance. It's not just about eliminating restrictions, it's about maximizing the "push-pull" effect of exhaust pulses.
Reply
Old Nov 1, 2012 | 05:44 AM
  #12  
Bret86944's Avatar
Bret86944
Registered User
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 529
Likes: 0
From: Cincinnati
Default

OP, if you are OK with your car sounding like complete garbage, then don't stop at removing the muffler. Remove the exhaust after the headers, this will get rid of choke points - the cats and the resonator. Otherwise you are wasting your time. The cats and resonator are probably screwing up the flow anyways, so your muffler is not the weak point.
Reply
Old Nov 1, 2012 | 06:00 AM
  #13  
ocdz's Avatar
ocdz
Registered User
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 800
Likes: 7
From: central ohio
Default

Originally Posted by Bret86944
The cats and resonator are probably screwing up the flow anyways, so your muffler is not the weak point.
+1

OP you don't think that all the companies with engineers, flow testing, and practical experience know more about exhaust than you do? Go ahead and cut the muffler off. It will still be slow and then sound like shyt.
Reply
Old Nov 1, 2012 | 11:08 AM
  #14  
TheWoods's Avatar
TheWoods
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 199
Likes: 1
From: Huntington Beach
Default

After reading this, I have become a tad concern with my setup. I have an HKS Rep from eBay (I know, I know) But it sounds great. Its 2.5 true duel. I decided to delete the front resonators off the and install a x-pipe, which sounds so fki'n sexy. However, I'm not sure if I have too much flow... Any insight on this?
Reply
Old Nov 1, 2012 | 11:17 AM
  #15  
Waiz's Avatar
Waiz
Premier Member
Premier Member
iTrader: (57)
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 18,465
Likes: 10
From: SoCal
Default

Hmm I thought the "myth" was already busted?

https://my350z.com/forum/intake-exha...kpressure.html
Reply
Old Nov 1, 2012 | 11:17 AM
  #16  
bmccann101's Avatar
bmccann101
350Z-holic
Premier Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 8,321
Likes: 467
From: Scottsdale/coyote drophouse
Default

They lose torque.
I have one..
But...id not lose a moment of sleep.. very few 350z exhausts make ANY power..unless you have 1500 avail for motordyne, enjoy what u have.
Cams make power..extra fuel n a tube makes power..fi makes power..bolts r for fun..so have fun w them..especially if u like the sound..powerful vq exhaust doesn't actually sound so hot..function over form.
Reply
Old Nov 1, 2012 | 11:30 AM
  #17  
TheWoods's Avatar
TheWoods
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 199
Likes: 1
From: Huntington Beach
Default

Originally Posted by bmccann101
They lose torque.
I have one..
But...id not lose a moment of sleep.. very few 350z exhausts make ANY power..unless you have 1500 avail for motordyne, enjoy what u have.
Cams make power..extra fuel n a tube makes power..fi makes power..bolts r for fun..so have fun w them..especially if u like the sound..powerful vq exhaust doesn't actually sound so hot..function over form.
Good to know. The only thing I hate is the metalicy rasp. Is that a characteristic of the VQ? or is that because I have test pipes. If I put my stock cats back on will the rasp go away? Will that restore back pressure? Should I leave the x pipe on or cut it off? Should I get a tune?

Last edited by TheWoods; Nov 1, 2012 at 11:35 AM.
Reply
Old Nov 1, 2012 | 12:42 PM
  #18  
IDrm350's Avatar
IDrm350
Registered User
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,030
Likes: 0
From: Irvine, CA
Default

That article is mostly right, but the reasoning leading to the conclusions is wrong. For example, the pressure pulses won't "wander" around like that. They will still have the same shape in the big pipe but they will be wider, decreasing the magnitude of the pressure wave. What causes overly large exhausts to lose pressure is the reduction in exhaust gas velocity which decreases the "sucking" (scavenging) effect of the exhaust out of the cylinder.

It's also not correct that you must have optimized the system upstream of the muffler to see any benefit from a high flow muffler. The flow rate through a pipe is dictated by the overall pressure drop which is a function of a lot of things. If you reduce ANY pressure loss anywhere in the system while all other things are held constant, the flow rate will increase. So removing the muffler will increase the flow rate and therefore the power created by the engine. That said, removing the muffler will not produce enough of a decrease in pressure drop to produce significant gains. The catalytic converters are a much greater source of pressure loss/backpressure and when removed will produce noticeable gains. Also, the catalytic converters will not disrupt the pressure pulses in the system, just decrease their magnitude (pressure loss due to restriction). They are essentially a laminar flow element (this isn't laminar flow but still) so the flow distribution entering will be maintained.
Reply
Old Nov 1, 2012 | 02:54 PM
  #19  
Arvin89's Avatar
Arvin89
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 785
Likes: 0
From: Vancouver
Default

Originally Posted by IDrm350
That article is mostly right, but the reasoning leading to the conclusions is wrong. For example, the pressure pulses won't "wander" around like that. They will still have the same shape in the big pipe but they will be wider, decreasing the magnitude of the pressure wave. What causes overly large exhausts to lose pressure is the reduction in exhaust gas velocity which decreases the "sucking" (scavenging) effect of the exhaust out of the cylinder.

It's also not correct that you must have optimized the system upstream of the muffler to see any benefit from a high flow muffler. The flow rate through a pipe is dictated by the overall pressure drop which is a function of a lot of things. If you reduce ANY pressure loss anywhere in the system while all other things are held constant, the flow rate will increase. So removing the muffler will increase the flow rate and therefore the power created by the engine. That said, removing the muffler will not produce enough of a decrease in pressure drop to produce significant gains. The catalytic converters are a much greater source of pressure loss/backpressure and when removed will produce noticeable gains. Also, the catalytic converters will not disrupt the pressure pulses in the system, just decrease their magnitude (pressure loss due to restriction). They are essentially a laminar flow element (this isn't laminar flow but still) so the flow distribution entering will be maintained.
This makes more sense. And is the reason i am just running test pipes on the stock exhaust. It sounds a little deeper and louder than the stock vq gurgle without the elephant queef... hahahaha... had me rolling with that one.

But back to the original article. What he is saying (as idrm350 mentioned) if you dont optimize the flow upstream from the muffler it wont make a difference if you change the muffler (including a delete). Fire hose at the end of a garden hose reference. So if youre basing your decision on what he said. Muffler delete is pointless.

Last edited by Arvin89; Nov 1, 2012 at 02:56 PM.
Reply
Old Nov 2, 2012 | 04:38 AM
  #20  
JCITY's Avatar
JCITY
Banned
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 3,274
Likes: 1
From: GEORGIA
Default

Interesting article.From my experiece,owning many cars,it all depends on the car.
However,from what I've experience,proper design of an exhaust system depends
on some back pressure in the system to force the exhaust gasses from the car
n the most efficient manner.I agree with bmccann101's comments on Motordyne.
However,is the increase in power that you can actually feel worth the price?
Yeah,lets be truthful,most guys want the sound and the primary reason for
an exhaust mod.To illustrate my earlier point,I like many others owned a VW bug.
These are great cars to learn the basics of how a car works.Anyone that has heard
a bug knows that flat mettalic exhaust sound coming out of the pea shooter exhaust
tips.I added some over size tips with resonators to get a deeper sound.Hopefully to get a few more ponies over the measly 40.The results?Less power!Backpressure was designed in the system to give the engine more torque.
Got to laugh on how many posts are from owners "opening up" their exhausts
only to lose power.If the other components are there,mods in intakes,cam etc
together with a tune it makes sense.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:12 AM.