Faster than a Z?
I was just curious, In your guys opinion, What percentage of cars in the states do you feel are faster than the z. Cars you see during your daily driving. I feel its probably only 10 to 20. every time i drive most cars i see dont stand up to the Z.
There's many that are faster than the Z... but many many MANY more that aren't. As for the SRT-4 being faster, some think it's questionable but I think the Z is still a little quicker.
Originally posted by wildone_106
Theres a huge list of faster cars, from the Neon Srt to any beemer you can name
Theres a huge list of faster cars, from the Neon Srt to any beemer you can name
Trending Topics
Originally posted by wildone_106
Theres a huge list of faster cars, from the Neon Srt to any beemer you can name
Theres a huge list of faster cars, from the Neon Srt to any beemer you can name
from the same price range,
sti>evo8>camaro z28>trans am>mustang svt>str-4>Z>s2000>wrx>rx8>rsx-s..... etc...so i can say Z is not the fastest car in that price range but it has the BEST No,1 appreance from those...^^
sti>evo8>camaro z28>trans am>mustang svt>str-4>Z>s2000>wrx>rx8>rsx-s..... etc...so i can say Z is not the fastest car in that price range but it has the BEST No,1 appreance from those...^^
Last edited by aaaaa; Jun 20, 2004 at 12:39 PM.
Now we have two people on this thread with the SRT over the Z.... stock for stock, the Z comes out slightly ahead (driver's skill aside) although the best a stock SRT owner can claim is that the two are pretty much dead even. Now how many SRT owners actually stay stock after purchase....? It doesn't take too much dough to make those faster than the Z... 
Good link elbe, but I wonder why was the Touring model tested...?

Good link elbe, but I wonder why was the Touring model tested...?
Altho there are many cars that are faster than the Z, you dont see many of them on the road.
I live in LA, I'd say around 5% of the cars I see on the road will beat the Z in the quarter mile. The reason why it's so low....
1. There's LOTS of beaters on the road
2. A lot of the faster cars are very unbearable to drive on LA roads on a daily basis
3. I'd say half of the cars that are faster than the Z, 99% of the population can not afford.
just my $0.02
I live in LA, I'd say around 5% of the cars I see on the road will beat the Z in the quarter mile. The reason why it's so low....
1. There's LOTS of beaters on the road
2. A lot of the faster cars are very unbearable to drive on LA roads on a daily basis
3. I'd say half of the cars that are faster than the Z, 99% of the population can not afford.
just my $0.02
Originally posted by yobri
Now how many SRT owners actually stay stock after purchase....? It doesn't take too much dough to make those faster than the Z...
Now how many SRT owners actually stay stock after purchase....? It doesn't take too much dough to make those faster than the Z...
Originally posted by ajk4
yea, but almost all of the people on this board have modified z's.
yea, but almost all of the people on this board have modified z's.
). Not sure what you were trying to argue there, but I'm definitely against the Neon ride... thus why I bought a Z. I was emphasizing stock for stock that the edge is in favor of the Z... the aesthetics are just a huge bonus to boot
Besides the affordability factor, the SRT is a car for those that don't really mind what a car looks like in lieu of power. And with that, those Neons are modded severely (by those that would purchase such things) which ekes out decent gains for which to compete against "nicer" stock cars, e.g. the Z



