300ZX in 4 seats?? Why not 350Z?

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

Jul 10, 2004 | 03:34 PM

#21

azjimbo

Registered User

Joined: May 2002

Posts: 625

Likes: 0

From: Az.

A real Z is a 2 seat Z.2+2's were never a real Z imo.

Jul 10, 2004 | 04:41 PM

#22

AZZGUY

Registered User

Joined: Mar 2004

Posts: 512

Likes: 0

From: Scottsdale, AZ

Quote:

Originally posted by r34 racer
the two back seats of the 90's sports cars were huge jokes, they were meant to save insurance money (these were heavily turbocharged RWD cars...insurance hell), you can't really fit anybody back there over the age of 3.

Wrong! I bought a 1990 300 ZX new - 2+2 - 2 small adults could ride in back seats around town. And - it wa great for traveling - had the extra space - plus the nice trunk. NO - it did not look too long - had good lines - was beautiful. I drove it like a sports car - up the mountains at 75 to 85/90 around the curves with great comfort. Had it up to 125 a couple times - once on a old 2 lane highway and the other time raced a mercedes part way from Casa Grande ( and beat him well also! ) No, it was not the turbo 300 ZX! I was the irridescent yellow with t-tops, leather 5 speed, bose, etc.

Any more broad statments??