Official Next Gen Z Speculation Thread
02-01-2006, 02:35 PM
#41
Premier Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (10)
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Houston and Austin, TX
Posts: 1,600
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
well, asian languages sometimes dont translate correctly...hell most languages dont. it could be a "paddle shifter" or it could mean literally only 2 pedals (ie automatic) a 6speed auto would be very cool though
02-01-2006, 05:29 PM
#47
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: boston
Posts: 807
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by NissanZfan
Does any of this translate to how much it weights?
the spec chart reads:
Lenght
Width
Height
Wheel base
Engine type
Liter
Hp
Torque
02-05-2006, 09:38 AM
#49
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Sunny, smoggy California
Posts: 917
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Oh great: the Z looks even more crack-happy now 
. The a$$ looks nice, but the front needs more getting used to. I still think the track model bellow looks more manly. Watchout M3, the Z is comming up. By the way, what does 38.0 kgm of torque equate to in lbs ft?
-------------------
. The a$$ looks nice, but the front needs more getting used to. I still think the track model bellow looks more manly. Watchout M3, the Z is comming up. By the way, what does 38.0 kgm of torque equate to in lbs ft?-------------------
Originally Posted by sanf
is this it? 330hp base.
Last edited by Tenac1ousZ; 02-05-2006 at 09:40 AM.
02-08-2006, 03:33 AM
#50
Registered User
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: NY
Posts: 1,505
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Tenac1ousZ
Watchout M3, the Z is comming up. By the way, what does 38.0 kgm of torque equate to in lbs ft?
-------------------
-------------------
02-08-2006, 06:00 AM
#51
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Sunny, smoggy California
Posts: 917
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by SnakeBitten
The M3 hasnt stood still ya know...I think its the M4 now no longer M3...And its going to be a 400+hp V8 now........
Watchout M4, the Z is 5-6 car length behind. But the Z is comming up on the old M3 though.
02-08-2006, 06:18 AM
#52
Registered User
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 1,298
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I think overall, the "new" design looks sweet. I esp. like the rear.
However, the front is too oval/rounish IMO.
Any interior pics?
However, the front is too oval/rounish IMO.
Any interior pics?
Last edited by mchong75; 02-08-2006 at 07:04 AM.
02-08-2006, 10:50 AM
#53
350Z-holic
iTrader: (45)
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Miami/Kendall, Florida
Posts: 5,327
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I think it looks nice so far.
But why are they changing the engine? It says FZ37DE V6 DOHC.
Does that mean Nissan thinks the VQ35DE has reached it's potential in N/A form?
tun tun tun tun........
But why are they changing the engine? It says FZ37DE V6 DOHC.
Does that mean Nissan thinks the VQ35DE has reached it's potential in N/A form?
tun tun tun tun........
02-08-2006, 12:26 PM
#54
Premier Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (10)
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Houston and Austin, TX
Posts: 1,600
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Jun
I think it looks nice so far.
But why are they changing the engine? It says FZ37DE V6 DOHC.
Does that mean Nissan thinks the VQ35DE has reached it's potential in N/A form?
tun tun tun tun........
But why are they changing the engine? It says FZ37DE V6 DOHC.
Does that mean Nissan thinks the VQ35DE has reached it's potential in N/A form?
tun tun tun tun........
Going 3.7L would allow for another 20-30hp
02-08-2006, 03:18 PM
#56
ok,
As a present Z owner I feel oblegated to comment! That looks good. The rear is very noticable and destinctive. I believe a concensus is that the rear is great. As a concept it will be fine. The production version will never come out like that anyway.
As for the front,.... it looks too aftermarketish. The lines and seams need to be softer and more together so the front cap doesn't look apart from the fender wells and the front bumper. IMO The more round corners that have been taken are a start, but it contradicts the hard definate lines of seperation to the bumper and the fender flares.
Pricing: I looked at the price of the 06 Z and compared to what I paid for my 03 was simply a difference in tax, lisc, and reg. The new styling could easily be in the 39k to 41k range. That is also taking for granted the engine is upgraded to 350hp at the wheel and a smoother interior. The car has two seats not four. Why not make the drivers side of the car more drivers, by turning more of the dash and center console to the driver. You don't have to disassociate the driver from the passenger, just let them know where they sit!
As a present Z owner I feel oblegated to comment! That looks good. The rear is very noticable and destinctive. I believe a concensus is that the rear is great. As a concept it will be fine. The production version will never come out like that anyway.
As for the front,.... it looks too aftermarketish. The lines and seams need to be softer and more together so the front cap doesn't look apart from the fender wells and the front bumper. IMO The more round corners that have been taken are a start, but it contradicts the hard definate lines of seperation to the bumper and the fender flares.
Pricing: I looked at the price of the 06 Z and compared to what I paid for my 03 was simply a difference in tax, lisc, and reg. The new styling could easily be in the 39k to 41k range. That is also taking for granted the engine is upgraded to 350hp at the wheel and a smoother interior. The car has two seats not four. Why not make the drivers side of the car more drivers, by turning more of the dash and center console to the driver. You don't have to disassociate the driver from the passenger, just let them know where they sit!
Last edited by cal_z; 02-08-2006 at 03:25 PM.
02-08-2006, 03:33 PM
#57
If you look closely, the three pics on the add are clearly not the same car. Each pick is diff. The big one at the top looks like it has a different front but the wheels and ground effects are different in the second pic. Clearly the third pick is an 06 model.
(snagged off a Lotus Elise?????) If this is the '07 I'll be buying the '06!
02-08-2006, 06:59 PM
#59
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: durham, NC
Posts: 409
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Displacement bumps
Originally Posted by andrew
Actually, early history reveals...
1970 240Z 2.4 ltrs newly introduced
1974 260Z 2.6 ltrs displacement bump after only 4 years
1975 280Z 2.8 ltrs displacement bump after only 1 year
1970 240Z 2.4 ltrs newly introduced
1974 260Z 2.6 ltrs displacement bump after only 4 years
1975 280Z 2.8 ltrs displacement bump after only 1 year
.These displacement bumps were needed to offset additional weight and emission requirements and maintain 1970's performance.
02-09-2006, 11:29 AM
#60
New Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: In your head
Posts: 1,507
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Are you guys joking?That design looks like ****! It needs to be, wider and lower.That sketch makes the Z look like it will tower over everything...it reminds of the stance the STI's have.