Notices
2009+ 370Z General discussion and news for the Z34 (2009+) Nissan 370z with the new 3.7-liter V6

I've seen the 370Z...

Old Aug 23, 2008 | 12:10 PM
  #201  
KhanMan's Avatar
KhanMan
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,686
Likes: 0
From: Hollywood California
Default

Originally Posted by Arnold K.
No there isn't. Nissan is lying about the weight figures of the 06+ Zs.
What is the of lying about the weight? And what is the proof? Maybe they used the weight of a fully loaded 350Z GT or GT convertible?
Reply
Old Aug 23, 2008 | 12:17 PM
  #202  
SniperHunter's Avatar
SniperHunter
Registered User
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 4,080
Likes: 0
From: NYC
Default

Nissan claims an 06+ Touring Coupe weighs 3350lbs. :\

Many of us, including myself, have weighed our cars with a full tank and get a number that's 100lbs less than that. The same weight listed on my car's title and registration is the same weight I got when I weighed the car stock (~3250). Now that number is significantly different thanks to all the weight reduction.

My conspiracy theory is that Nissan has intentionally done this so that they can release the 370Z, have it weigh 3150lbs and say it weighs 200lbs less than the outgoing Z. When in reality it'll be only 100lbs. Just my 2 pence.
Reply
Old Aug 23, 2008 | 12:22 PM
  #203  
zsport1's Avatar
zsport1
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 818
Likes: 0
From: Texas
Default

I don't buy into the conspiracy theory thing at all. Sorry.
Reply
Old Aug 23, 2008 | 01:21 PM
  #204  
Endgame's Avatar
Endgame
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 526
Likes: 0
From: Phoenix
Default

Even at 3150, with 330 HP it will still fly.... Remember the old M3 had 333 HP and was 3420.... 0-60 = 4.8 seconds...
Reply
Old Aug 23, 2008 | 05:41 PM
  #205  
KhanMan's Avatar
KhanMan
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,686
Likes: 0
From: Hollywood California
Default

I wonder if they are doing the same thing with the G35 and G37.
Reply
Old Aug 23, 2008 | 07:10 PM
  #206  
lonewolf's Avatar
lonewolf
Registered User
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 727
Likes: 0
From: Long Island
Default

Originally Posted by 10 till 4 zlot
Hey lone wolf who pissed in your corn flakes
**** OFF YOU LITTLE ******!!!!!!!!!!!!
Reply
Old Aug 23, 2008 | 07:31 PM
  #207  
black06z's Avatar
black06z
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 7,166
Likes: 0
From: West Coast/Pacific Rim
Default

Originally Posted by Arnold K.
Nissan claims an 06+ Touring Coupe weighs 3350lbs. :\

Many of us, including myself, have weighed our cars with a full tank and get a number that's 100lbs less than that. The same weight listed on my car's title and registration is the same weight I got when I weighed the car stock (~3250). Now that number is significantly different thanks to all the weight reduction.

My conspiracy theory is that Nissan has intentionally done this so that they can release the 370Z, have it weigh 3150lbs and say it weighs 200lbs less than the outgoing Z. When in reality it'll be only 100lbs. Just my 2 pence.
I dunno about this. With almost an 8" reduction in length, I don't see a small number like only 100lbs covering for that much car. 8" is pretty significant.
Reply
Old Aug 23, 2008 | 07:45 PM
  #208  
jmasi's Avatar
jmasi
Registered User
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 253
Likes: 0
From: Temecula SOCAL/Denver CO
Default

all i know is nissans current new line up of cars are butt ugly and so they may make the z fugly too..
Reply
Old Aug 23, 2008 | 07:48 PM
  #209  
kvjacobz's Avatar
kvjacobz
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 107
Likes: 0
From: P'cola, FL
Default

Originally Posted by black06z
8" is pretty significant.
I'd like to think so.
Reply
Old Aug 23, 2008 | 08:17 PM
  #210  
black06z's Avatar
black06z
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 7,166
Likes: 0
From: West Coast/Pacific Rim
Default

Originally Posted by kvjacobz
I'd like to think so.
The Z is already a short-length car. It looks bigger than it really is, because of the wide rear-end + fenders. At my workplace parking lot seeing it parked by all the other cars, it looks super small and really compact. Try putting a ruler to the tail end of your Z and reducing 8". You'll be surprised if you visualize the difference.
Reply
Old Aug 23, 2008 | 10:36 PM
  #211  
KhanMan's Avatar
KhanMan
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,686
Likes: 0
From: Hollywood California
Default

Originally Posted by black06z
I don't see a small number like only 100lbs covering for that much car. 8" is pretty significant.
Well maybe it has heavier parts, and more features that make it only 100lbs-200lbs lower? After all the new nav system on the touring model does have some weight to it.
Reply
Old Aug 24, 2008 | 01:54 AM
  #212  
Skorch's Avatar
Skorch
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,773
Likes: 0
From: Phoenix, AZ
Default

Originally Posted by black06z
The Z is already a short-length car. It looks bigger than it really is, because of the wide rear-end + fenders. At my workplace parking lot seeing it parked by all the other cars, it looks super small and really compact. Try putting a ruler to the tail end of your Z and reducing 8". You'll be surprised if you visualize the difference.
I don't need a ruler to measure 8 inches...

I agree though, the Z does look bigger than it really is. I'd love to see a side-by-side comparison of the 350 vs. 370.
Reply
Old Aug 26, 2008 | 02:54 PM
  #213  
Proteus's Avatar
Proteus
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 43
Likes: 0
From: Irvine, CA
Default

All the images coming out now matches what I saw in that focus group almost exactly - especially the leaked slide that was circulating around.
Reply
Old Aug 26, 2008 | 03:12 PM
  #214  
Proteus's Avatar
Proteus
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 43
Likes: 0
From: Irvine, CA
Default

Just to clarify: The entire focus group was recorded by employees of Nissan's offices in Los Angeles behind a one-way mirror. The actual group was conducted by a third party, by an employee of that third party whos job is to specifically conduct focus groups like these.

The images I saw were high-resolution prints mounted to foamcore, very polished and clear photography of the vehicle (which was silver). There were side, front, rear, 3/4s, interior cabin and interior rear shots. The images were passed around then put on the wall. We focused less on the design of the car (as we were told that the design in these images were final save any last minute revisions) and more related to how Nissan wanted to position the car and advertise the car.

They also asked us about what we'd expect to pay (not what we'd *like* to pay). They also asked us if they could get away with charging $3000 more because of the increased performance, then asked us if they thought the GTR raised the 'Nissan' brand and asked if they could get away with charging $5000 more.

We were also shown a series of images (one of a typical 'Fast and the Furious' street race scene with modified cars and underglow, one of a man simply enjoying the raw power and precision of the vehicle on a twisty road, and one of a man and a VERY hot woman embracing each other while leaning on a 350Z). Well all agreed the enthusiastic driver best matched the Z-Car linage.

We also said that the Z's history and name played a big role in our decisions to purchase the 350Z.
Reply
Old Aug 26, 2008 | 03:15 PM
  #215  
OldDirty Z33's Avatar
OldDirty Z33
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 2,040
Likes: 0
From: Inland Empire
Default

boring
Reply
Old Aug 26, 2008 | 03:23 PM
  #216  
Spork's Avatar
Spork
Registered User
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 27,592
Likes: 6
From: MN
Default

Originally Posted by Proteus
Just to clarify: The entire focus group was recorded by employees of Nissan's offices in Los Angeles behind a one-way mirror. The actual group was conducted by a third party, by an employee of that third party whos job is to specifically conduct focus groups like these.

The images I saw were high-resolution prints mounted to foamcore, very polished and clear photography of the vehicle (which was silver). There were side, front, rear, 3/4s, interior cabin and interior rear shots. The images were passed around then put on the wall. We focused less on the design of the car (as we were told that the design in these images were final save any last minute revisions) and more related to how Nissan wanted to position the car and advertise the car.

They also asked us about what we'd expect to pay (not what we'd *like* to pay). They also asked us if they could get away with charging $3000 more because of the increased performance, then asked us if they thought the GTR raised the 'Nissan' brand and asked if they could get away with charging $5000 more.

We were also shown a series of images (one of a typical 'Fast and the Furious' street race scene with modified cars and underglow, one of a man simply enjoying the raw power and precision of the vehicle on a twisty road, and one of a man and a VERY hot woman embracing each other while leaning on a 350Z). Well all agreed the enthusiastic driver best matched the Z-Car linage.

We also said that the Z's history and name played a big role in our decisions to purchase the 350Z.
If you saw it, draw a rough drawing of what it looks like.
Reply
Old Aug 26, 2008 | 03:54 PM
  #217  
Proteus's Avatar
Proteus
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 43
Likes: 0
From: Irvine, CA
Default

Originally Posted by Silverstone-Z
If you saw it, draw a rough drawing of what it looks like.
Considering theirs already pictures out, what would be the point? The details ive outlined in the OP represent the largest changes to the overall look of the car.

Especially the part about one of the gauges being digital.

If you'd like, I can rough out a line drawing of the side view, but I'm pretty sure it would end up looking like I drew it from the leaked slide.
Reply
Old Aug 30, 2008 | 08:53 AM
  #218  
willyz's Avatar
willyz
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
From: Westminster, CO
Default

Everyone is just feeding this idiot's need for internet attention.
Reply
Old Aug 30, 2008 | 09:50 AM
  #219  
ParkStr8's Avatar
ParkStr8
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
From: Los Angeles
Default

As for weight, a change in wheel and tire size could alone make a difference. 17's to 18 to 19 is easily 100 pounds.

Then if you compare the weight of an enthusiast versus a Grand Touring, again because of options easily a hundred or so pounds.

It jsut depends on the build of the car.

Just my .02
Reply
Old Aug 30, 2008 | 09:59 PM
  #220  
ctwentytwo's Avatar
ctwentytwo
Registered User
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 2,069
Likes: 1
From: Waipahu HI; Phoenix AZ
Default

A new rendition by Road and Track:



Comparing to other pics around the web, I have a sick feeling this is gonna be close... I'm really not digging the new design.
Reply

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:55 AM.