2009 370z spy video
10-25-2007, 09:55 AM
#1
Registered User
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: IL
Posts: 1,348
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2009 370z spy video
http://www.edmunds.com/insideline/do...ticleId=121314
there u go guys, if its a repost, sorry.
but theyre saying theyre aiming on litening the car (thank god) cuz they admitted it was heavier than its other competitors.
theyre claiming 320hp to the rear wheels.
there u go guys, if its a repost, sorry.
but theyre saying theyre aiming on litening the car (thank god) cuz they admitted it was heavier than its other competitors.
theyre claiming 320hp to the rear wheels.
10-25-2007, 09:58 AM
#2
350Z-holic
iTrader: (22)
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Texas
Posts: 13,983
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by joe645733
http://www.edmunds.com/insideline/do...ticleId=121314
there u go guys, if its a repost, sorry.
but theyre saying theyre aiming on litening the car (thank god) cuz they admitted it was heavier than its other competitors.
theyre claiming 320hp to the rear wheels.
there u go guys, if its a repost, sorry.
but theyre saying theyre aiming on litening the car (thank god) cuz they admitted it was heavier than its other competitors.
theyre claiming 320hp to the rear wheels.
Where do you see TO THE REAR WHEELS AT????????the 370Z's V6 would probably come in around 320-325 hp, a modest bump to the 306 hp delivered by the current 3.5-liter V6
Trending Topics
10-25-2007, 08:55 PM
#11
New Member
Originally Posted by silverstripes
Yes, and it does say to the rear wheels, true or not, he does say it. Listen again.
10-26-2007, 08:40 AM
#12
Registered User
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Florida
Posts: 466
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
What gets me is the fact of the new having alot more power than the new g37. I figure with a low average of 15% drive train loss the new z would be around 375hp crank hp and I doubt it would be that high... 
Last edited by brooke; 10-26-2007 at 09:44 AM.
11-17-2007, 04:33 PM
#17
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Livonia, MI
Posts: 619
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I don't like the lower slant on the rear hatch. Honestly, I know everyones beef with the weight is the lost in performance, but personally, it's still a phenomenal car. Something lighter and smaller, and I'd say it'd be less safe and less unique. I don't know how much shorter it can get, before its a Miata.
11-18-2007, 02:17 AM
#18
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: SoCal
Posts: 785
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by zand02max
Where do you see TO THE REAR WHEELS AT????????
I have read in several reports that Nissan is shooting for 350-355hp at the crank on the next Z as well as lightening it by 1-200lbs from its current level by making slightly smaller....maybe an inch narrower, some lighter parts...who knows
But 350-355 from a 3.7L with VVEL doesnt sound like an outrageous claim....that should be around 300whp from the factory and if its even 100lbs lighter than current Z's it will be a 12 sec Z straight off the showroom
11-19-2007, 11:04 AM
#20
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: DFW, Texas
Posts: 65
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by SergEK
But 350-355 from a 3.7L with VVEL doesnt sound like an outrageous claim....that should be around 300whp from the factory and if its even 100lbs lighter than current Z's it will be a 12 sec Z straight off the showroom
Give us a 350hp, 3,000lbs car for around 30K and they'll have a killer car.