Notices
2009+ 370Z General discussion and news for the Z34 (2009+) Nissan 370z with the new 3.7-liter V6

Edmunds- 2009 370Z vs 2010 Mustang GT

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 11, 2009 | 06:05 AM
  #1  
Wukillabeez78's Avatar
Wukillabeez78
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 73
Likes: 0
From: Raleigh, NC
Default Edmunds- 2009 370Z vs 2010 Mustang GT

http://www.edmunds.com/insideline/do...hotopanel..1.*
Reply
Old Mar 11, 2009 | 07:47 AM
  #2  
Rexy7's Avatar
Rexy7
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 426
Likes: 0
From: Z-land, New York
Default

Originally Posted by Wukillabeez78
Nice write up, another win for the 370z..lol at the quote "sloppy handling of the mustang" mustangs are always known for there crappy handling no matter what pos ford has to offer.
Reply
Old Mar 11, 2009 | 07:56 AM
  #3  
TreeFittyZee's Avatar
TreeFittyZee
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 180
Likes: 0
From: ionno...
Default

not really surprised...
Reply
Old Mar 11, 2009 | 07:57 AM
  #4  
Entaille's Avatar
Entaille
New Member
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 9,043
Likes: 21
From: WA
Default

they said don't ask why a challenger wasn't available, but I want to ask

it will be interesting to see them compare the v6 and v8 camaro in the future.
Reply
Old Mar 11, 2009 | 08:03 AM
  #5  
melloyello370's Avatar
melloyello370
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 65
Likes: 0
From: California
Default

My god those two cars are not long time rivals! Besides both having only 2 doors, they have nothing in common.

I hate Mustangs. It seems every time I turn around another high school kid is driving one. I kinda like being set apart from that in my 370. Hell, for that matter, I kinda like being set apart from that same aspect of the 350. Sorry.

The mustang isn't producing the same power as the Z with 2 more cylinders?? So basically having an extra liter simply means using more gas and not getting results equal to the Z.


About the mustang:
"..the live rear axle becomes an obvious liability." - oops

F*#@ed On Race Day!
Reply
Old Mar 11, 2009 | 08:17 AM
  #6  
Rexy7's Avatar
Rexy7
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 426
Likes: 0
From: Z-land, New York
Default

lol..F=frequently O=on R=repair D=duty...or duty as an sh*t..lol
Reply
Old Mar 11, 2009 | 08:25 AM
  #7  
HyperKnight's Avatar
HyperKnight
Stulax makes me cream
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 16,401
Likes: 631
From: Fort Worth, Texas
Default

By some of these comments some of you guys are still in high school.
Reply
Old Mar 11, 2009 | 08:32 AM
  #8  
Rexy7's Avatar
Rexy7
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 426
Likes: 0
From: Z-land, New York
Default

adult here...it is what it is..I had a cobra caused my previous car rx-7(fd3s)stock to crash because the pos mustang could not handle a s turn @ 90mph.
Reply
Old Mar 11, 2009 | 08:50 AM
  #9  
BrianV's Avatar
BrianV
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 224
Likes: 0
From: Austin, TX
Default

Great article, and it shows how great the 370z is as an overall sports car.

I am getting tired of reading these Ford, Chevy piece of crap generalizations. How many Mustangs do you see on the road? Tons, trust me they're reliable, and they're easy and cheap to fix. The 4.6L modular V8 they've used has been proven a bulletproof design. Look how many NYC cabs and towncars have that motor with 250K + miles. Look at how many Crown Vic cop cars are still around, and those get hardcore duty cycles.

I'd argue that a Mustang will be as reliable if not more reliable than a 370Z. Having said that, I'd totally take the Z over it for much of the reasons mentioned in that article.

The 422hp SS Camaro is going to be a real neat comparison. I expect it to be faster while the 370z is the more athletic and nimble (obvious assumption).

Anyways, I like the new Mustang. It's the first Mustang I think is a positive step for Ford. The Shelby GT500 version is expected to get a 40hp bump, and with the classier interior it should be pretty cool, but I'd still take an LS3 Z51 Vette.

I'm holding out that Nissan fixes their NVH issues. My 07 G35S lacks complete refinement above 5k rpm and it's getting tiring. After driving my friends' BMWs 330i, IS350, and Audi S4, I REALLY desire a smoother power deliver. This is one thing holding me back from jumping into the 370z. That and a wish that a 500Z will exist one day in the ~45k range targeting E92 M3 performance.
Reply
Old Mar 11, 2009 | 09:35 AM
  #10  
Rexy7's Avatar
Rexy7
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 426
Likes: 0
From: Z-land, New York
Default

My local chevy dealerships are trying to get rid of left over 08 corvettes for mid 30's very tempting..vette is the only american car for the money bang for the buck I would get but untill gm gets their financial problems straight..I will still keep & love my Z.
Reply
Old Mar 11, 2009 | 10:02 AM
  #11  
RedSled's Avatar
RedSled
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 133
Likes: 0
From: Albuquerque, NM
Default

Originally Posted by melloyello370
My god those two cars are not long time rivals! Besides both having only 2 doors, they have nothing in common.

I hate Mustangs. It seems every time I turn around another high school kid is driving one. I kinda like being set apart from that in my 370. Hell, for that matter, I kinda like being set apart from that same aspect of the 350. Sorry.

The mustang isn't producing the same power as the Z with 2 more cylinders?? So basically having an extra liter simply means using more gas and not getting results equal to the Z.


About the mustang:
"..the live rear axle becomes an obvious liability." - oops

F*#@ed On Race Day!
You talk about the 350Z being commonplace and while I do agree, what makes you think the 370Z isn't going to be commonplace within a few years too?

Also, don't be so ignorant about the mustang.
Reply
Old Mar 11, 2009 | 04:57 PM
  #12  
melloyello370's Avatar
melloyello370
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 65
Likes: 0
From: California
Default

Originally Posted by RedSled
You talk about the 350Z being commonplace and while I do agree, what makes you think the 370Z isn't going to be commonplace within a few years too?

Also, don't be so ignorant about the mustang.
Ignorance has nothing to do with it. I drove a Ford.. have you? All I was saying was that Mustangs are a dime a dozen because they are cheap. Cheap to upgrade, cheap to fix and obviously that is going to appeal to a wide array of people. Maybe not as wide as say a Honda Civic but you get the idea.

With that said, I have seen some badass Mustangs out there but the generic styling is starting to really look dated (inside as well as out) and performance wise, they just are in a different class all together.

Finally, I don't recall saying that I think the 370 wouldn't be commonplace given enough time. Most affordable cars are. It's just nice not to be commonplace for the time being. Plus, there's "affordable" (like a Civic) and then there's "affordable". The second "affordable" not too many high schoolers can afford.
Reply
Old Mar 11, 2009 | 05:02 PM
  #13  
Hoods's Avatar
Hoods
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 339
Likes: 0
From: El Paso, TX
Default

Originally Posted by melloyello370
Plus, there's "affordable" (like a Civic) and then there's "affordable". The second "affordable" not too many high schoolers can afford.
I think the difference is the first is called "affordable", while the second is called "obtainable".
Reply
Old Mar 11, 2009 | 05:04 PM
  #14  
melloyello370's Avatar
melloyello370
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 65
Likes: 0
From: California
Default

Originally Posted by Hoods
I think the difference is the first is called "affordable", while the second is called "obtainable".
Very good. I'll go with that.
Reply
Old Mar 11, 2009 | 05:46 PM
  #15  
robertinmesa's Avatar
robertinmesa
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 195
Likes: 0
From: arizona
Default

nice review.
Reply
Old Mar 11, 2009 | 06:20 PM
  #16  
Carbon-Z's Avatar
Carbon-Z
Sleeps in 350Z
Premier Member
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,513
Likes: 0
From: Mid-West
Default

Wow, you always have some complaint about every car you own.

You will never be happy.

Originally Posted by BrianV
Great article, and it shows how great the 370z is as an overall sports car.

I am getting tired of reading these Ford, Chevy piece of crap generalizations. How many Mustangs do you see on the road? Tons, trust me they're reliable, and they're easy and cheap to fix. The 4.6L modular V8 they've used has been proven a bulletproof design. Look how many NYC cabs and towncars have that motor with 250K + miles. Look at how many Crown Vic cop cars are still around, and those get hardcore duty cycles.

I'd argue that a Mustang will be as reliable if not more reliable than a 370Z. Having said that, I'd totally take the Z over it for much of the reasons mentioned in that article.

The 422hp SS Camaro is going to be a real neat comparison. I expect it to be faster while the 370z is the more athletic and nimble (obvious assumption).

Anyways, I like the new Mustang. It's the first Mustang I think is a positive step for Ford. The Shelby GT500 version is expected to get a 40hp bump, and with the classier interior it should be pretty cool, but I'd still take an LS3 Z51 Vette.

I'm holding out that Nissan fixes their NVH issues. My 07 G35S lacks complete refinement above 5k rpm and it's getting tiring. After driving my friends' BMWs 330i, IS350, and Audi S4, I REALLY desire a smoother power deliver. This is one thing holding me back from jumping into the 370z. That and a wish that a 500Z will exist one day in the ~45k range targeting E92 M3 performance.
Reply
Old Mar 11, 2009 | 08:01 PM
  #17  
BrianV's Avatar
BrianV
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 224
Likes: 0
From: Austin, TX
Default

Originally Posted by Carbon-Z
Wow, you always have some complaint about every car you own.

You will never be happy.
Call it like you want, but pretty much all VQ35s have suffered from roughness at high rpms. Obviously I've put up with it as a tolerable trait because the rest of the car is so awesome. I was just commenting that I agreed with the only negative of the review. I've owned 3 VQ35 cars (04 G35, 04 Z, and 07 G35S) so I have a lot of experience.

I fail to realize where I had any significant complaint in that thread other than the engine harshness. My defense of the Mustang is because people have all these conjured up, subjective, mythical American cars are unreliable statements that are basically untrue.

I still said the Z is the better car in pretty much all aspects.
Reply
Old Mar 11, 2009 | 08:24 PM
  #18  
Red6's Avatar
Red6
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,046
Likes: 0
From: So Cal
Default

I quote ThisBlood147 from the Mustangforums because he sums up my feelings about the camparison.

"When comparing a pony car with a sportscar, should the results really be this surprising? I do have to correct them for making the Mustang out to seem pricier to start with, though......base price is 27.9K, not 30K. And as I've proven with my car, the Mustang is only a set of springs and good tires away from sticking right with the Z in the corners........if one is so inclined to make their Stang into a carver that can hang with the likes of the Z."

When Nissan builds a 2+2 coupe in the same segment as the Mustang, then I'll take such a comparo seriously. Only the devout auto enthusiasts (like those on sites like this one) will cross-shop these two cars. All other prospective consumers will be turned off by one choice or the other by styling, option pricing, or interior space (or lack thereof).
Reply
Old Mar 11, 2009 | 08:36 PM
  #19  
PA 19103's Avatar
PA 19103
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 227
Likes: 0
From: Philadelphia
Default

Never been a fan of Mustangs, they are nice, sounds mean but ultimatly they are POS and break more than a Nissan. Go to any junk yard and see what you'll find there, mostly American made cars.

I like the fact the Z handles better at the cones and skidpad, it kills the Mustang. I think Z would win in a track setting.

That just my 2 cents.
Reply
Old Mar 11, 2009 | 10:56 PM
  #20  
TreeFittyZee's Avatar
TreeFittyZee
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 180
Likes: 0
From: ionno...
Default

LOL @ mustang guys asking why a 2 seater is being compared with a 4 seater and labeling it as unfair

Corvette Z06 vs. Nissan GTR anyone? rofl
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:07 PM.