M3 beats GT-R and Porsche turbo in C&D comparison test
Registered User
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 880
Likes: 0
From: NY
Originally Posted by gatti-man
well if you dont like a rice mobile (gtr) then the m3 is the nice choice. Also if you have a family m3 ftw here as well.
*disclaimer* i like the gtr but to me its styling is a 1 out of 5. Id rock it any day of the week still.
*disclaimer* i like the gtr but to me its styling is a 1 out of 5. Id rock it any day of the week still.
GT-R all the way baby.
Registered User
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 880
Likes: 0
From: NY
Originally Posted by JSDZ33
you are the biggest gtr nuthugger on this forum... you are not allowed to +1 that comment. nuthugger. 
Registered User
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 438
Likes: 0
From: MA
Originally Posted by areddy
If liking a car for its superior performance and looks for a more than reasonable price is called nut-hugging, then well sir, call me a nut-hugger.
Originally Posted by Diesel350
Another blind fanboy gives his 2 cents!!Hold up, why do they have to be a fanboy because they say they said they would take the GTR? What ever happened to personal preference? I mean, you chose the Z because you liked it right? Does that make you a fanboy?
Personally, I love all 3 cars. My order would be 911(legend), GTR(new kid on the block), BMW(style).
Banned
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 2,787
Likes: 0
From: puerto rico
Guys, guys, GT-Rs are not perfect cars--neither are our Zeds, for that mat-
ter---,they're just much, much CUTER than either the Bimmer or the Porsche.
So, relax; our monZters are right up there with the competition. BTW, THE main reasons for my getting a "Z", was: 1. Looks; 2. MPG; 3. Ergonomics; 4.
Thrills; 5. R-e-l-i-a-b-i-l-i-t-y!!! Enjoy your beasts. Some of those reviews/
evaluations are NOT objective; inevitably, the article writer's emotions create
bias.
ter---,they're just much, much CUTER than either the Bimmer or the Porsche.
So, relax; our monZters are right up there with the competition. BTW, THE main reasons for my getting a "Z", was: 1. Looks; 2. MPG; 3. Ergonomics; 4.
Thrills; 5. R-e-l-i-a-b-i-l-i-t-y!!! Enjoy your beasts. Some of those reviews/
evaluations are NOT objective; inevitably, the article writer's emotions create
bias.
Originally Posted by AroundMyHorn
Hold up, why do they have to be a fanboy because they say they said they would take the GTR? What ever happened to personal preference? I mean, you chose the Z because you liked it right? Does that make you a fanboy?
Personally, I love all 3 cars. My order would be 911(legend), GTR(new kid on the block), BMW(style).
Personally, I love all 3 cars. My order would be 911(legend), GTR(new kid on the block), BMW(style).
Registered User
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 43
Likes: 0
From: brownstown
This is the second article I've seen where the GTR posted these kind of numbers. 12.1 sec @ 115 mph is pretty good for 480 hp and 3900#'s. Using 3500 miles on the odometer as an excuse is just lame. That doesn't sound good in terms of reliability. I've never heard of a car losing 10 mph from it's trapspeed after just 3500 miles.
C&D is like the Mad Magazine.. I laugh everytime I read it. M3 is nowhere near the gtr - m5 and 6 would be a much better comparo. I almost feel bad for porche, as they're always falling behind in performance.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
