Notices
2009+ Nissan GT-R Nissan R35 GT-R Discussion

Porsche accuses Nissan of cheating...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-30-2008, 01:49 PM
  #61  
i8acobra
New Member
iTrader: (6)
 
i8acobra's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Henderson, NV
Posts: 7,760
Received 1,283 Likes on 1,028 Posts
Default

One of the tuner mags recently did a short story about how much power the GTR really makes. They compared track times and dyno numbers from pre-production cars and two production models. The basic consensus was that the production cars are making close to 530HP at the crank, not the advertised 480HP.
Old 09-30-2008, 01:57 PM
  #62  
aggietsi
New Member
 
aggietsi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Royse City, TX
Posts: 267
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

That's quite a marketing ploy by Nissan.

Originally Posted by i8acobra
One of the tuner mags recently did a short story about how much power the GTR really makes. They compared track times and dyno numbers from pre-production cars and two production models. The basic consensus was that the production cars are making close to 530HP at the crank, not the advertised 480HP.
Old 09-30-2008, 02:07 PM
  #63  
whitetrack
New Member
iTrader: (1)
 
whitetrack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 374
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Maybe Porsche should get Toshio Suzuki to test drive their cars. Who knows, he may better their times.
Old 09-30-2008, 03:12 PM
  #64  
InZpire
Registered User
iTrader: (5)
 
InZpire's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Orange County, Ca
Posts: 1,830
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Bummer! I guess I gotta cancel that order now.

ha ha!
Old 09-30-2008, 04:34 PM
  #65  
blasian
New Member
iTrader: (29)
 
blasian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Get out my way pimpin, LA
Posts: 33,731
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by i8acobra
One of the tuner mags recently did a short story about how much power the GTR really makes. They compared track times and dyno numbers from pre-production cars and two production models. The basic consensus was that the production cars are making close to 530HP at the crank, not the advertised 480HP.
So why are customer bought GT-R's running 11.6-11.7? Even a 11.5
Old 09-30-2008, 04:37 PM
  #66  
ZU L8R
Viper Sellout
iTrader: (84)
 
ZU L8R's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Orlando, Fl
Posts: 6,871
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Who cares, the ACR smoked them both
Old 09-30-2008, 04:38 PM
  #67  
blasian
New Member
iTrader: (29)
 
blasian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Get out my way pimpin, LA
Posts: 33,731
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by ZU L8R
Who cares, the ACR smoked them both
Old 09-30-2008, 04:54 PM
  #68  
CLETUS
Registered User
 
CLETUS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: San Francisco, Ca
Posts: 805
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ZU L8R
Who cares, the ACR smoked them both
trooof!
Old 09-30-2008, 05:28 PM
  #69  
Cux350z
hatersgonnahate
Premier Member
iTrader: (162)
 
Cux350z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Greenville, SC
Posts: 15,057
Received 1,028 Likes on 785 Posts
Default

Also remember, 25 seconds on a that track time is just a hair over 5% of the total time.

Do you think a pro driver could cut off 5% of the time as compared to a chassis engineer?
I think a pro-driver could be 5% faster in a car hes lapped several times as compared to someone who hasnt.
Old 09-30-2008, 05:35 PM
  #70  
HDPDZO6
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
HDPDZO6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 5,998
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Chris @ Migliore
Also remember, 25 seconds on a that track time is just a hair over 5% of the total time.

Do you think a pro driver could cut off 5% of the time as compared to a chassis engineer?
I think a pro-driver could be 5% faster in a car hes lapped several times as compared to someone who hasnt.
Not going to get into whether or not the times are realistic. However, I will debate the thought that the engineers used are novice drivers. Many of them employed by automakers are former professional drivers with alot of seat time.

If that were the case, then the ZR-1 would be capable of a 7:05 - 7:10 lap time; afterall, the GM claimed time was obtained using an engineer, not professional driver as well.
Old 09-30-2008, 06:46 PM
  #71  
areddy
Registered User
 
areddy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: NY
Posts: 880
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Concave
sneaky nissan.. tricking all of its own fanboys.........
sux to be a nissan fanboy.
Old 09-30-2008, 09:27 PM
  #72  
ReV2Red
I haz da turbos
iTrader: (9)
 
ReV2Red's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: In the basement
Posts: 1,621
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by visitor
Their longest straight, the entire runway when they attempt high speed runs that's not even part of their normal track, is dogshit compared to the nurburgring's longest straight. Plus the track is entirely flat, not even comparable.

The level of logic in this thread is amazing.
And some people need to keep there knickers from getting in a twist
This forum is for discussing which is what were doing. If you want to go ahead and start insulting people then go and join a civic forum.
Old 09-30-2008, 09:47 PM
  #73  
xDIEGOx
Registered User
 
xDIEGOx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 8,026
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I wonder what Porsche is going to say when the SPEC-V laps the 'Ring...


Old 09-30-2008, 09:51 PM
  #74  
xDIEGOx
Registered User
 
xDIEGOx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 8,026
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

6speedonline's responses ----> http://www.6speedonline.com/forums/9...last-post.html
Old 09-30-2008, 09:52 PM
  #75  
Playboy's Z
Registered User
 
Playboy's Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: California
Posts: 857
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

these threads are the reason i still visit the forum haha. nissan made a very good car, it will be interesting how they respond to porsches accusations.
Old 10-01-2008, 12:01 AM
  #76  
moflow
New Member
 
moflow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: seattle
Posts: 3,091
Received 15 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 350z-Jim
RWD faster than AWD in the same platform around the same track. DO you get it now?? Do I need to spell it out more for you?

RWD > AWD on the Nordschleife

Now stop talking already "motormouth"

Good lord, where do these people come from honestly? The internet is full of smart guys.
RWD is NOT superior to AWD. AWD will nearly always have the advantage coming out of corners, particularly if it's set up for performance driving (as in the GT-R) the reason some AWD cars may be slower than their FWD or RWD counterparts is because of the massive weight penalty they take due to all that AWD equipment. This weight penalty often offsets any advantage AWD offered. The higher the horsepower of the vehicle the more advantage AWD has, PARTICULARLY on a track like the nurburgring that is so long the conditions could change literally every lap around.

The reason most race cars are RWD is because AWD cars are generally against the rules. This is done primarily because of the cost and complexity of AWD. The best way to kill a racing series is to make it so expensive to compete, only the richest teams will be competitive. Oh and to have lots of mechanical failures, an inevitable consequence of added complexity.

ask yourself this: Why are WRC cars running AWD in Germany, or Corsica or any of the other Tarmac rallys? Certainly it would not be that hard to simply send no power to the front wheels, and yet they still do it....because the cars are already handicapped with the weight penalty and they'll get out of turns much faster with the front wheels receiving a portion of the torque.

BTW i have no idea about weather or not nissan is lying. I just needed to end all this RWD>AWD nonesense.

Last edited by moflow; 10-01-2008 at 12:04 AM.
Old 10-01-2008, 12:05 AM
  #77  
moflow
New Member
 
moflow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: seattle
Posts: 3,091
Received 15 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Jun
his real name is Clarence, he went to private school!



(hopes somebody gets the joke)
please enlighten me. I've heard this before and it's driving me NUTS!
Old 10-01-2008, 12:46 AM
  #78  
sukebe
Registered User
 
sukebe's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Chandler, AZ
Posts: 87
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by moflow
please enlighten me. I've heard this before and it's driving me NUTS!
Spaghetti Spaghetti Spaghetti Spaghetti
Old 10-01-2008, 01:02 AM
  #79  
moflow
New Member
 
moflow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: seattle
Posts: 3,091
Received 15 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by sukebe
Spaghetti Spaghetti Spaghetti Spaghetti
AW goddamnit! now i'm ashamed of myself.....
Old 10-01-2008, 02:25 AM
  #80  
axxent
Registered User
 
axxent's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: socal
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Best motoring 7/2008

They ran 07:29:03

The tires are... see pic

And Best motoring 10/2008 nsx vs porsche gt vs gtr @ Maze
Attached Thumbnails Porsche accuses Nissan of cheating...-time.jpg   Porsche accuses Nissan of cheating...-tires.jpg   Porsche accuses Nissan of cheating...-maze.jpg  

Last edited by axxent; 10-01-2008 at 02:56 AM.


Quick Reply: Porsche accuses Nissan of cheating...



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:08 PM.