Notices
350Z Roadster General discussion for the 350Z Roadster

2004 350Z / Roadster faster? Better?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-16-2003, 05:55 AM
  #21  
Chris S
Registered User
 
Chris S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 366
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally posted by rummya87
convertibles = not good looking
chris s = troll
Dude, you just signed up, and call me a troll?

I have better things to do. I'm here b/c it's likely my next car will be a 350Z, and I want to learn more about it. Geez, some people act like it's impossible to appreciate both the S2000 and the 350Z!
Old 02-16-2003, 06:45 AM
  #22  
TJZ
Registered User
 
TJZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Gainesville, Florida
Posts: 806
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

just commenting on the Z sharing the FM platform. I believe the FM platform was designed for the Z. Just b/c the g35 was released first people got all their panties in a bunch.
Old 02-16-2003, 05:26 PM
  #23  
Chris S
Registered User
 
Chris S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 366
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

The FM platform was designed to be a versatile base for a variety of vehicles, incl. the Z. Nothing wrong w/ that, it's a good chassis and doesn't appear to be compromised by its versatility.
Old 02-16-2003, 06:55 PM
  #24  
rummya87
Registered User
 
rummya87's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: florida
Posts: 135
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally posted by Chris S
Dude, you just signed up, and call me a troll?

I have better things to do. I'm here b/c it's likely my next car will be a 350Z, and I want to learn more about it. Geez, some people act like it's impossible to appreciate both the S2000 and the 350Z!
if you've read any of my other posts im a complete JOKER. take it easy man, we're all cool here, and the s2000 is SWEET i just like to **** people off
Old 02-17-2003, 10:51 AM
  #25  
mcduck
Registered User
 
mcduck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 4,052
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

IMO a convertible sportscar is an oxymoron
  • Shelby Cobra
  • MGs
  • Dodge Viper
  • Porsche Boxster
  • Chapperal (hope I spelled that right... 60's vintage race car)
  • S2000
  • TVR
  • Jaguar J-type

I could go on... but I think you get the point... since when are sportscar and convertible mutually exclusive???? As far as I have heard, original Cobras will still drive circles around most modern "sportscars". In that case, a hard top was the exception (only 7 made) not the rule.

New and old, there is always a market for both coupe and roadster sportscars. Typically, a coupe will be more rigid and handle better, but not always (unless you are comparing two versions of the same car).
Old 02-17-2003, 01:09 PM
  #26  
rummya87
Registered User
 
rummya87's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: florida
Posts: 135
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

most of the classic ferarris were 'verts.
Old 02-24-2003, 05:36 PM
  #27  
grebmohr
Registered User
 
grebmohr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Greensboro, GA
Posts: 106
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Just revisiting...

About weight and Rigidity: The hard top will be lighter, that is a given. Look in any books and you will see this to be true.

About having a stout frame: There have been huge advancements in unit frame construction. however, they cannot equal the strength on a car that is connected across on top and bottom. any thing that is removed from the top area (read that upper unit body reinforcement) must be made up for in the lower section. The forces to contend with are magnified when applied to one plane where they were controlled in two planes. Just for giggles... hold a broom by the end of the handle, away from your body, and place the sweeping end on a table. My guess is you could hold it there for some time. Now take the bristles off the table and assume the same position with broom. how long can you hold it. yup cause forces like weight and torsion took huge increases. My point in this ramble is how much material must be added to the remaining frame to stabilize a car body after removing the roof? So much in fact, that they would never do it. Thats right -they know the car will have some flex and they plan for it.

One more test - I used to think I knew what a rigid car body felt like when driving. Yeah I was wrong and here is how I found out.
Place you finger on the door gap(inside or out) and then pull through some twisties. YIKES! did you feel that? OMG! here is a better one for convertibles. Roll down window and place your finger at the join of the top header bow and windshield header. Now pull through some wistes. Yes that movement you feel is constantly acting on your windshield frame. Kinda scary. GL

Oh - I am getting the Roadster! just not sure what to do with the tourer yet.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
416blueZ
Wheels & Tires
11
06-11-2024 10:56 AM
416blueZ
New Owners
10
09-25-2015 10:00 AM
416blueZ
2003-2009 Nissan 350Z
5
09-24-2015 02:11 PM
NYGiants0186
2003-2009 Nissan 350Z
3
09-08-2015 10:37 AM



Quick Reply: 2004 350Z / Roadster faster? Better?



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:03 AM.