When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
so i raced a mazda speed 3 completly stock my car is stock as well its a 2006 roadster. we rolled of a 40 and he beat me both times maybe by half a car. i noticed this morning that i had my vdc on i didnt switch it off. could that have made a diffrence??
you have a roadster which is heavy, you have the DE motor which IMO would lose to a stock ms3, and the ms3 may have had a downpipe which you could not hear with a stock exhaust..
ok I was exaggerating it has 240 HP - I still would've put my money on the Z with a good driver.
Just stop posting if you don't know. It's 263HP and 280TQ, and some say the car is underrated and has a bit more HP than that. By no means is it a slow car.
This is one of the least intelligent threads I've read here in a while. Congratulations to all of the above!
edit: Excluding Arnold.
Agreed.
This is the type of car bashing that makes enthusiasts look like d bags.
The speed 3 is a very impressive car in many ways. Ive had the pleasure of riding in a speed 3 with mild mods and it pushed me into the seat harder than any NA z ive ridden in.
Mazda speed 3 and 6 are very nice cars with nice interiors and performance to match I never understood why they're not more popular. Turbo, awd, very cumfy and quick as hell