Bone stock 370 + Stillen HFC & CBE + reflash/tune = +51whp!?!?
05-18-2009, 05:07 AM
#62
Wow I guess you didn't read any of the posts here did you? It was said several times and it's right in front of you.
When you have a complete exhaust and other mods you gain more from the tunes. Only having HFCs and then doing a tune you are still restricting a ton from the exhaust. It's like you still didn't remove the bottleneck.
When you have a complete exhaust and other mods you gain more from the tunes. Only having HFCs and then doing a tune you are still restricting a ton from the exhaust. It's like you still didn't remove the bottleneck.
Last edited by SOLO-350Z; 05-18-2009 at 05:09 AM.
05-18-2009, 06:20 AM
#63
Registered User
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Seattle (area), WA
Posts: 2,921
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
ok, so show me someone that did gain 46whp with exhaust, hfc's, and a tune... A.H doesn't count cause he has more than just those mods...
infact, there was a guy there at the same dyno day with an 08, he had injen cai, aam test pipes, greddy ti-c dual exhaust, and a cobb tune, and he dyno'd at 298. a stock hr on that dyno puts down about 265-272. thats about a 30 whp gain... and he also has intakes... which according to A.H, adds a good amount of power...
infact, there was a guy there at the same dyno day with an 08, he had injen cai, aam test pipes, greddy ti-c dual exhaust, and a cobb tune, and he dyno'd at 298. a stock hr on that dyno puts down about 265-272. thats about a 30 whp gain... and he also has intakes... which according to A.H, adds a good amount of power...
Last edited by warmmilk; 05-18-2009 at 06:23 AM.
05-18-2009, 06:41 AM
#65
Registered User
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Seattle (area), WA
Posts: 2,921
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
so you have no proof, you're just speculating based on the results other people got with similar mods...
you're the one that has "no clue"
you're the one that has "no clue"
Last edited by warmmilk; 05-18-2009 at 06:54 AM.
05-18-2009, 06:56 AM
#69
Registered User
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Seattle (area), WA
Posts: 2,921
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
tell you what, if you get 312 whp on a dynojet, with just what you have plus a tune on your average run of the mill pump gas, i'll paypal you a hundred bucks
Last edited by warmmilk; 05-18-2009 at 06:59 AM.
05-18-2009, 07:31 AM
#74
Registered User
iTrader: (19)
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Houston,TX
Posts: 1,395
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
on his same dyno (but you know. different day isn't apple to apple) I made 285 and some change with a "rich" tune, hfc and full 3" exhaust and matching Y pipe.
probably going for the aggressive afr and timing 290 or more would have been possible.
I'm going to retune for test pipes and change a faulty primary O2 sensor.. we'll see.. but I don't think I'm going even to get close to 300whp.
probably going for the aggressive afr and timing 290 or more would have been possible.
I'm going to retune for test pipes and change a faulty primary O2 sensor.. we'll see.. but I don't think I'm going even to get close to 300whp.
05-18-2009, 07:53 AM
#75
Registered User
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Seattle (area), WA
Posts: 2,921
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
mustang dyno's are to easy to manipulate to get the power you want, it has to be a dyno jet
well here you go solo, or are you gonna say that a more aggressive tune would result in 27 more whp?
thanks for posting Ataru
***to everyone in this thread, please realize that i'm not hating, i'm just being realistic...
Originally Posted by Ataru074
on his same dyno (but you know. different day isn't apple to apple) I made 285 and some change with a "rich" tune, hfc and full 3" exhaust and matching Y pipe.
probably going for the aggressive afr and timing 290 or more would have been possible.
I'm going to retune for test pipes and change a faulty primary O2 sensor.. we'll see.. but I don't think I'm going even to get close to 300whp.
probably going for the aggressive afr and timing 290 or more would have been possible.
I'm going to retune for test pipes and change a faulty primary O2 sensor.. we'll see.. but I don't think I'm going even to get close to 300whp.
thanks for posting Ataru
***to everyone in this thread, please realize that i'm not hating, i'm just being realistic...
05-18-2009, 07:58 AM
#76
Registered User
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Seattle (area), WA
Posts: 2,921
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
05-18-2009, 08:04 AM
#78
Registered User
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Seattle (area), WA
Posts: 2,921
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
why don't you look at Ataru's results, as he has the exact mods we're talking about. he only made 285.
here is the question, made it nice and big so you don't miss it:
are you saying Ataru will make 27 more whp with a more aggressive tune?
05-18-2009, 08:25 AM
#79
how many times do i need to say that he's results are useless to what we're talking about. we're talking about exhaust, hfc's, and tune only!
why don't you look at Ataru's results, as he has the exact mods we're talking about. he only made 285.
here is the question, made it nice and big so you don't miss it:
are you saying Ataru will make 27 more whp with a more aggressive tune?
why don't you look at Ataru's results, as he has the exact mods we're talking about. he only made 285.
here is the question, made it nice and big so you don't miss it:
are you saying Ataru will make 27 more whp with a more aggressive tune?
