View Poll Results: 1 10w6v2 vs 2 10w3s
1 10w6v2
39
56.52%
2 10w3s
30
43.48%
Voters: 69. You may not vote on this poll
Poll: 1 10w6v2 vs 2 10w3s
03-25-2006, 05:12 AM
#21
New Member
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 8,365
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
i've got the JL Stealthbox with the 2 10w3v2's and it hit great and sounds clean...no complaints...the stealthbox is simple, but definitely not showy, if that's what you're looking for
03-25-2006, 06:28 AM
#22
Registered User
iTrader: (25)
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 784
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by 16psibrick
well, the reason why i made my comment is that its not awlays twice as much air...
for example...
many subs, though rated at say 12" , due to some overly large surround, only has a cone size of a 10, and plus if their xmax isnt good...then..
basically two 10" sub with a cone size of a 9 with only 10mm of xmax or so is going to displace LESS air than a 12" sub with a true 12" cone size and witha 24mm xmax...
but in the case fo the jl subs, the displaced volume of two 10 w3s will be about what...50-60 percent more than a single 10w6
b
for example...
many subs, though rated at say 12" , due to some overly large surround, only has a cone size of a 10, and plus if their xmax isnt good...then..
basically two 10" sub with a cone size of a 9 with only 10mm of xmax or so is going to displace LESS air than a 12" sub with a true 12" cone size and witha 24mm xmax...
but in the case fo the jl subs, the displaced volume of two 10 w3s will be about what...50-60 percent more than a single 10w6
b
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
o snap its eric
Audio & Video
11
12-13-2004 08:56 AM
