Notices
Autocross/Road SCCA Solo II, SCCA Club Racing, Redline Track Events, Speed Trial, Speed Ventures, Grand-Am Cup, JGTC, Procar Australia

koni yellow with 2 different spring choices.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 21, 2007 | 07:30 AM
  #21  
betamotorsports's Avatar
betamotorsports
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,393
Likes: 3
From: La Habra, CA, USA
Default

On a car that's not running aero, slightly lifting an inside front wheel is OK as long as the car isn't pushing out of the corner under power. For a compromise street/solo car I've often went with what many people consider really stiff springs. What makes them work on the street are shocks with great rebound control and a soft compression setting. Digressive valving helps even more.
Reply
Old Feb 21, 2007 | 08:21 AM
  #22  
Fluid1's Avatar
Fluid1
Registered User
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 11,953
Likes: 0
From: NOPE NOPE NOPE
Default

Originally Posted by Gsedan35
When I ran 350Z H-techs is got the distinct impresison that they were not as stiff as their specs said they were.
If they are progressive, the claimed rates are maximums.
Reply
Old Feb 21, 2007 | 09:45 AM
  #23  
Gsedan35's Avatar
Gsedan35
New Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 3,121
Likes: 7
From: Central California
Default

Originally Posted by Fluid1
If they are progressive, the claimed rates are maximums.
Yes, thats "IF" of course and I alway's do use that disclaimer whenever I discuse progressive spring rates. But they are not progressive, no matter what Tein says. They do not have coil bind nor do they differ in wire diameter top to bottom, they are linear springs.
Reply
Old Feb 21, 2007 | 09:54 AM
  #24  
Gsedan35's Avatar
Gsedan35
New Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 3,121
Likes: 7
From: Central California
Default

Originally Posted by betamotorsports
On a car that's not running aero, slightly lifting an inside front wheel is OK as long as the car isn't pushing out of the corner under power. For a compromise street/solo car I've often went with what many people consider really stiff springs. What makes them work on the street are shocks with great rebound control and a soft compression setting. Digressive valving helps even more.
And the stiffer springs will help make up for setups that are short on bump travel, though a better choice would be the same with shortened bodies, ala Truechoice phase 4. Though my own experience was that off the shelf Koni sports with 448lbs in the front did not have rebound control in reserve, going even higher in rate would not extend things.

Curious in my neck of the woods, 500-600 lbs in the maximum I can use and still maintain tire contact 95% of the time. When you mention "really stiff rates" for this platform what does that mean to you? Again, only asking because I'm curious.
Reply
Old Feb 21, 2007 | 09:58 AM
  #25  
Gsedan35's Avatar
Gsedan35
New Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 3,121
Likes: 7
From: Central California
Default

Originally Posted by FritzMan
Hard front and softer rear is definitely the way to go IMO.

The Hotchkis drop is very subtle. I only got just under 1" up front and btw .5 to .75" rear drop. The only problem is that they are a little soft - especially for R compounds. In the pics below you can see that I actually managed to pick a tire off the ground, and the one below that shows how much compression the rear goes through in a quicker corner.

I then ran the T2 springs with Konis and they were able to do a respectable job at full rebound. I didn't care for the rear bias spring rate though. It wasn't too bad in the quicker corners where rear rotation was ideal, but in highly transitional sections (slalom) it was difficult to really attack.

I'm currently running 500 front Truechoice coilover conversion and 427 rear 'revised' with the yellows and they work very well for street/Solo2 duty. I've since had the front rebuilt and slightly revalved so I'm looking forward to seeing how they perform this spring.
That's right your running the Truechoice coilover setup. But I didn't know you were running Koni yellow's and revised rear springs. I just got a email yesterday from Truechoice about the cost of buying 2 front Phase 4 shocks. I'm basically thinking of the same setup with yellows in the rear on revised oem rears. Thinking that the front rate will be either 500-600. Glad to hear you like it. On the front shocks, which phase of kit are they from, III or IV?

Last edited by Gsedan35; Feb 21, 2007 at 10:46 AM.
Reply
Old Feb 21, 2007 | 10:06 AM
  #26  
Gsedan35's Avatar
Gsedan35
New Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 3,121
Likes: 7
From: Central California
Default

Originally Posted by in2therain3
That's what it seems like right now.
I'm looking into some coilover set-up as of right now.
It seems like Tanabe's basic coilover has a good spring rate and valving, but I havn't heard a detailed review from somebody who has tracked this particular coilover and the fact that it's not adjustable.
Stance coilover is an another option for me as they have received great reviews except the noise it makes... I'm actually leaning toward stance if I were to do a coilover set-up.
I agree about the Tanabe spring rates, the only thing that gives me pause is how they may be tuned valving wise and how you cannot adjust them. Based on the one or two owner review's ever posted on them since most G and Z boards got started, I got the impression they they were valved more towards comfort then performance.

On the Stance setup, I've been considering them or thier 3-way adjustable setup. As far as the noise in the rear, if you don't mind giving up the ability to adjust rear ride height thier is a very simple effective solution. Do not install the rear springs the kit comes with, run your oem rear springs, math's out to be about the same wheel rate in the end. You can modify the upper oem upper spring seat to lower the rear of the car, up to .8". I I were to get them, I'd run the rear springs just as I've suggested.
Reply
Old Feb 21, 2007 | 10:26 AM
  #27  
myG35zx's Avatar
myG35zx
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 904
Likes: 0
From: Midwest
Default

I'm running Dspecs with 06 Z fronts (5 turns from firm) and 05 coupe rears (4 turns from firm). My car unsettles quite easily around Chicago. On a few roads the rear wants to jump to one side or the other.

I want to get this resolved, maybe a new setup is in order.
Reply
Old Feb 21, 2007 | 10:32 AM
  #28  
in2therain3's Avatar
in2therain3
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 349
Likes: 0
From: Virginia
Default

Originally Posted by Gsedan35
I agree about the Tanabe spring rates, the only thing that gives me pause is how they may be tuned valving wise and how you cannot adjust them. Based on the one or two owner review's ever posted on them since most G and Z boards got started, I got the impression they they were valved more towards comfort then performance.

On the Stance setup, I've been considering them or thier 3-way adjustable setup. As far as the noise in the rear, if you don't mind giving up the ability to adjust rear ride height thier is a very simple effective solution. Do not install the rear springs the kit comes with, run your oem rear springs, math's out to be about the same wheel rate in the end. You can modify the upper oem upper spring seat to lower the rear of the car, up to .8". I I were to get them, I'd run the rear springs just as I've suggested.
So the noise issue will be solved if the I used the OEM location? I'm not going to go lower than an inch and I really don't care about the height once I have it right. Thanks and keep it up Gsedan35, you provide lots of suspension information for everyone!
Reply
Old Feb 21, 2007 | 10:33 AM
  #29  
in2therain3's Avatar
in2therain3
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 349
Likes: 0
From: Virginia
Default

Also, using the oem location means that there will be no springs on the rear shockbody, correct?
Reply
Old Feb 21, 2007 | 11:06 AM
  #30  
Gsedan35's Avatar
Gsedan35
New Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 3,121
Likes: 7
From: Central California
Default

Originally Posted by in2therain3
So the noise issue will be solved if the I used the OEM location? I'm not going to go lower than an inch and I really don't care about the height once I have it right. Thanks and keep it up Gsedan35, you provide lots of suspension information for everyone!
Well my main concern revolves around the rear oem lower shock mount bushing being unable to deal with the the forces that a true coilover brings to bear on it. That is the source of most all the rear noise issues I have read about with the Stance coilover. That however, doesn't mean I could have missed post's that talked about a noise issue that originates somewhere else, I haven't found them though. Getting a sperical bushing made and pressed in would solve the problem, but none are on the horizon that I'm aware of. Beside's I've run the rear spring setup that way with a .8" drop and been very happy, though it's possible once the car get's on the scales for corner balancing I may not stay so happy since I wouldn't be able to adjust in the rear.

Originally Posted by in2therain3
Also, using the oem location means that there will be no springs on the rear shockbody, correct?
Correct.
Reply
Old Feb 22, 2007 | 12:17 AM
  #31  
in2therain3's Avatar
in2therain3
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 349
Likes: 0
From: Virginia
Default

Ok, so back to Konis.
I was doing some research about the truechoice set-up.
Anyone know how much it takes to get the front converted?
And would someone have problems with the shock running out of travel in the rear with the revised springs?
I am considering the truechoice set-up but I just wanted to know if this will get rid of the shock travel problem and if someone can enlighten me on some details, it'd be very helpful.
Reply
Old Feb 22, 2007 | 03:21 AM
  #32  
FritzMan's Avatar
FritzMan
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 681
Likes: 1
From: Ottawa, Canada
Default

Originally Posted by Gsedan35
That's right your running the Truechoice coilover setup. But I didn't know you were running Koni yellow's and revised rear springs. I just got a email yesterday from Truechoice about the cost of buying 2 front Phase 4 shocks. I'm basically thinking of the same setup with yellows in the rear on revised oem rears. Thinking that the front rate will be either 500-600. Glad to hear you like it. On the front shocks, which phase of kit are they from, III or IV?
I'm just running the standard sleeve and race spring conversion.

The REALLY disappointing thing about Truechoice is that their sleeve kit, at its lowest setting, brought my car *up* to OEM ride height. The Koni was already at it's lowest ring.

That's why I got the front rebuilt. They were going to charge me $60 to machine new grooves in the body (plus to and from shipping of course) - but they would do it for free if I got the dampers rebuilt. Pretty disappointing that I had to pay extra to compensate for their lack of R & D.

I did get the dampers rebuilt and was charged an extra $25/damper over the standard rebuild cost for 'extras' I never requested. Knowing I'm running 500 springs up front, it's possible they upgraded my dampers to one of their own Phases, but it was still very unprofessional in how they handled it. To top off my disappointment, the freshly painted body (included in the standard rebuild cost) chipped when the one dampers standing upright accidentally slid flat onto the concrete floor. Frankly, my kid smashes his $1 Hotwheels car together daily and they don't chip anywhere near that easy.

The kit is really well made, but it appears from my situation, they hadn't done their homework in making sure it worked well with the 350z. All they have to do is machine the internal race/perch within the threaded sleeve about 1" higher and it's perfect.

Last edited by FritzMan; Feb 22, 2007 at 03:41 AM.
Reply
Old Feb 22, 2007 | 07:59 AM
  #33  
betamotorsports's Avatar
betamotorsports
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,393
Likes: 3
From: La Habra, CA, USA
Default

Curious in my neck of the woods, 500-600 lbs in the maximum I can use and still maintain tire contact 95% of the time. When you mention "really stiff rates" for this platform what does that mean to you? Again, only asking because I'm curious.
I don't know yet, I haven't done the math or really any suspension tuning on my 350Z (I just finished putting the Nismo R-Tune LSD in the car.) The T2 springs are around 690 lb. in. and I think that is probably a reasonable starting point for a track car. Some have said that its too stiff for a street car but, even at 47 years old, I prefer a pretty stiff street ride. I'm probably not the best person to offer an opinion about a dual purpose car.
Reply
Old Feb 25, 2007 | 10:27 AM
  #34  
98sr20ve's Avatar
98sr20ve
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 332
Likes: 0
From: Pueblo West, CO
Default

Originally Posted by FritzMan
I'm currently running 500 front Truechoice coilover conversion and 427 rear 'revised' with the yellows and they work very well for street/Solo2 duty. I've since had the front rebuilt and slightly revalved so I'm looking forward to seeing how they perform this spring.

What did Truechoice do to the shocks? Install sleeves and a Tophat?
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Lt_Ballzacki
Brakes & Suspension
39
Aug 6, 2021 06:19 AM
MM'08_350Z
VQ35HR
225
Apr 22, 2021 09:42 PM
kyin
New Owners
12
Oct 15, 2015 05:54 AM
Rowlett
Misc.
3
Oct 2, 2015 10:38 AM
EnjukuRacing
Engine
0
Sep 30, 2015 06:55 AM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:08 PM.