Notices
Autocross/Road SCCA Solo II, SCCA Club Racing, Redline Track Events, Speed Trial, Speed Ventures, Grand-Am Cup, JGTC, Procar Australia

Unsprung weights, motion ratios, and natural frequencies?

Old Mar 26, 2010 | 06:00 AM
  #1  
senorcole86's Avatar
senorcole86
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
From: Here
Default Unsprung weights, motion ratios, and natural frequencies?

I tried posting this in the suspension section, but nobody seems to have any answers. I've seen some pretty technical discussions going on over here, so hopefully y'all can help me out.

I apologize if this information is available elsewhere, I honestly couldn't find it.

I was wondering if anybody had estimates for any of these numbers for a g35 coupe (or 350z) in stock form.

1) unsprung weights
2) motion ratios (I've heard 0.76 F and 0.39 R, but nobody was sure)
3) natural frequencies
4) Corner weights (don't have access to a set of scales, sorry)

I'm picking out suspension components and trying to get a really good handle on the natural frequencies of the vehicle. Thanks in advance guys, have a good one.
Reply
Old Mar 26, 2010 | 07:44 AM
  #2  
betamotorsports's Avatar
betamotorsports
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,393
Likes: 3
From: La Habra, CA, USA
Default

Corner Weights

2006 350Z Base with 1/2 tank of fuel, not spare, tools, no driver.

LF 889 RF 903
LR 694 RR 730

Left Side 1583 49.2%
Right Side 1634 50.8%
Front 1792 55.7%
Rear 44.3%
Cross (RF/LR) 1598 49.7%

Unsprung Weight

Stock spring, Koni Sport, Enkei RPF1 18 x 10 w/Hankook R214 285/30-10, stock calipers, Hawk DTC70 pads.

Front 135 lbs. (estimated)
Rear 130 lbs. (estimated)

Motion ratios and bump steer curve are already posted in this forum. Just do a search.

Last edited by betamotorsports; Mar 26, 2010 at 07:46 AM.
Reply
Old Mar 26, 2010 | 11:26 AM
  #3  
senorcole86's Avatar
senorcole86
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
From: Here
Default

I really have searched, and I've come up with conflicting information. Here's what I've found so far for motion ratios.

1) 0.79 F 0.36 R
2) 0.53 F (with 10 degree AC) 0.36 R
3) 0.688 F 0.649 R

The third option sounds more correct considering the stock spring rates, but I've seen the other two options quoted much more frequently. Which is correct?

Thank you for the information on corner weights and unsprung weights. I'll tack on the difference in wheel weights (I'm rolling on the Infiniti OEM 19's) and call it a day.
Reply
Old Mar 26, 2010 | 12:16 PM
  #4  
betamotorsports's Avatar
betamotorsports
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,393
Likes: 3
From: La Habra, CA, USA
Default

Be careful with my unsprung weight numbers. They are estimates based on weighing the main components separately over a period of time. I've used the third motion ratio numbers for my calcs and things worked out fine.
Reply
Old Mar 26, 2010 | 12:24 PM
  #5  
Zazz93's Avatar
Zazz93
New Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 1,769
Likes: 8
From: So Cal
Default

How would you use the motion ratios? I can't see an application unless your planning on mod'ing a pickup point.

Last edited by Zazz93; Mar 26, 2010 at 12:26 PM.
Reply
Old Mar 29, 2010 | 05:06 AM
  #6  
senorcole86's Avatar
senorcole86
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
From: Here
Default

Originally Posted by betamotorsports
Be careful with my unsprung weight numbers. They are estimates based on weighing the main components separately over a period of time. I've used the third motion ratio numbers for my calcs and things worked out fine.
Perfect, thanks a lot. I was hoping those were the correct ones, the other didn't make much sense when you started doing the math.

Originally Posted by Zazz93
How would you use the motion ratios? I can't see an application unless your planning on mod'ing a pickup point.
To figure out wheel rates with the stock pickup points.
Reply
Old Mar 29, 2010 | 05:33 AM
  #7  
Zazz93's Avatar
Zazz93
New Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 1,769
Likes: 8
From: So Cal
Default

Good to know, but I'm referring to what your end result is. Are you corner balancing the car, trying to get a idea for a new spring package, etc. Just wondering what I'm missing, and could be looking at.
Reply
Old Mar 29, 2010 | 08:20 AM
  #8  
senorcole86's Avatar
senorcole86
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
From: Here
Default

Yeah, I'm just running the numbers for different aftermarket suspension kits. Seeing how the roll stiffness and natural frequencies are affected. There's not a whole lot I could do until I get the springs on my car, but I'm a mechanical engineer and I like running the numbers . Makes me feel better and I like to make sure everything makes sense before I buy the stuff.
Reply
Old Mar 29, 2010 | 08:24 AM
  #9  
Zazz93's Avatar
Zazz93
New Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 1,769
Likes: 8
From: So Cal
Default

That's a great way double check the company has done their research and not just spec'ed a part because it just looked like a good idea.
Reply
Old Mar 30, 2010 | 06:35 AM
  #10  
diablox1's Avatar
diablox1
Registered User
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 976
Likes: 1
From: CaliFTMFGDW OMFG LMFAO LOL WUT
Default

+1 as an ME myself too i am forever doomed to run numbers like that. ive been surprised at some of the numbers & conclusions I've come up with from so called performance parts though.

Last edited by diablox1; Mar 30, 2010 at 06:37 AM.
Reply
Old Mar 31, 2010 | 06:21 PM
  #11  
SGSash's Avatar
SGSash
Vendor - Former Vendor
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 469
Likes: 3
From: Brampton, ON
Default

Common sense tells us there is no way the rear motion ratio can be 0.36 guys!
Reply
Old Apr 6, 2010 | 07:35 AM
  #12  
Zazz93's Avatar
Zazz93
New Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 1,769
Likes: 8
From: So Cal
Default

Originally Posted by SGSash
Common sense tells us there is no way the rear motion ratio can be 0.36 guys!
Good find Sash,

Found a calculation chart from third party's site. On SPL's website under the 350z's suspension area (springs to be precise). It has a Excel Calc that shows the ratio around 1.66 (Note SPL listed this as an inverse relationship than what is generally measured, spring to wheel Vs wheel to spring motion).

http://www.splparts.com/main4/parts/...Calculator.xls

Last edited by Zazz93; Jan 13, 2011 at 08:58 AM.
Reply
Old Aug 2, 2016 | 07:57 PM
  #13  
BeaverMeat's Avatar
BeaverMeat
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2016
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
From: Saskatchewan
Default

Originally Posted by SGSash
Common sense tells us there is no way the rear motion ratio can be 0.36 guys!
Nechro bump!

From my understanding there are two points to calculate from at the rear.

Rear OEM coil ratio is 0.36. The rear shock loaction ratio is 0.59. Is that used when your calculating for a proper rear mounted coilover?

Originally Posted by Zazz93
Good find Sash,

Found a calculation chart from third party's site. On SPL's website under the 350z's suspension area (springs to be precise). It has a Excel Calc that shows the ratio around 1.66 (Note SPL listed this as an inverse relationship than what is generally measured, spring to wheel Vs wheel to spring motion).

http://www.splparts.com/main4/parts/...Calculator.xls
How is the front calculated?

Last edited by BeaverMeat; Aug 2, 2016 at 08:05 PM.
Reply
Old Aug 2, 2016 | 09:59 PM
  #14  
terrasmak's Avatar
terrasmak
Super Moderator
MY350Z.COM
Premier Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 29,121
Likes: 2,400
From: Sin City
Default

Originally Posted by BeaverMeat
Nechro bump!

From my understanding there are two points to calculate from at the rear.

Rear OEM coil ratio is 0.36. The rear shock loaction ratio is 0.59. Is that used when your calculating for a proper rear mounted coilover?



How is the front calculated?
.97 is commonly used in the rear when the spring is mounted on the shock. Front I would have to look, but I thought I'd was like .73 or .68
Reply
Old Jan 12, 2026 | 08:20 AM
  #15  
Joan_RP87's Avatar
Joan_RP87
New Member
 
Joined: Dec 2023
Posts: 15
Likes: 1
From: Ordal
Default

Hi all.
A few days ago I measured the distances of the springs and wheels both front and rear of the 350Z and the values ​​I got are:
(Spring Offset/Wheel Offset): Front: 0.68 and Rear: 0.58
Motion Ratio (Wheel Offset/Spring Offset): Front: 1.47 and Rear 1.75
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
etkms
Engine & Drivetrain
29
Jun 19, 2022 06:30 PM
sales@czp
Engine
33
Sep 23, 2019 03:30 PM
1973camarolt
Drivetrain
5
Oct 11, 2015 01:26 PM
FromGtoZ
Intake Exhaust
2
Sep 20, 2015 03:41 PM
Shane86
Autocross/Road
2
Sep 17, 2015 05:33 PM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:44 PM.