RS*R springs
Originally Posted by anotheraznguy
i have htem on my car they ride pretty good.
better with aftermarket shocks.
better with aftermarket shocks.
Originally Posted by anotheraznguy
the front is lower than the rear.
this is w/ rs*r
2003-2004 shock = extreamly high compression dampning without enough rebound dampning. Net = nice weight transfer control, but bounce during cornering will reduce cornering speeds. The shock does perform's well on totally smooth pavement, but when real world bumps and undulations are met, they move from the aset to liability colum. Bounce and porposing because of these shocks is a serious problem, enough to seriously hurt the resale market, if not kill it. Tokico D-specs are a much superior replacement.
2004.5+ shock = less compression dampning and more rebound control then above. Net = less control on weight transfer, chassis feels less willing to play, but everyday ride quality is night and day better with superior control of ride motion's. In the end some may not feel that the 04.5+ shocks softer feel is a enhancement, though bounce and porposing needed to die a cruel death. Tokico D-specs would be a better choice in valving performane and because you can adjust them for rebound and compression dampning.
2004.5+ shock = less compression dampning and more rebound control then above. Net = less control on weight transfer, chassis feels less willing to play, but everyday ride quality is night and day better with superior control of ride motion's. In the end some may not feel that the 04.5+ shocks softer feel is a enhancement, though bounce and porposing needed to die a cruel death. Tokico D-specs would be a better choice in valving performane and because you can adjust them for rebound and compression dampning.
Trending Topics
Tokico D-specs are a much superior replacement.
A buddy of mine that I auto-cross with who also has a Z has the RS*R springs (and I was going to get them too). They are good, but the Espelir's are slighlty stiffer, and I like them better than the RS*Rs.
Originally Posted by knight_white99
+1 for the Tokico D-Specs. I am running these now with Espelir Active GT springs, and I find it to be a great combination.
A buddy of mine that I auto-cross with who also has a Z has the RS*R springs (and I was going to get them too). They are good, but the Espelir's are slighlty stiffer, and I like them better than the RS*Rs.
A buddy of mine that I auto-cross with who also has a Z has the RS*R springs (and I was going to get them too). They are good, but the Espelir's are slighlty stiffer, and I like them better than the RS*Rs.
Not to highjack, but I have the D-Specs, what is the drop with the Espelir, do they "lean" the car to one side like the Hotchkiss, did you get it in alignment without extra parts?
Not to highjack, but I have the D-Specs, what is the drop with the Espelir, do they "lean" the car to one side like the Hotchkiss, did you get it in alignment without extra parts?
As far as alignment, yes, I did have to get it aligned again. I am at about -2.0 degrees front, -1.4 rear, but that is where I want it (better for competition). I did buy Cusco A-arms front and SPC camber arms for the rear, but I haven't used them to bring alignment back to factory specs yet.
mikerz,
yes, the D-specs would be a good choice to match with these springs. although i have no personal experience, members on the forum have reported that the D-specs have suitable adjustment range that should include the spring rates of the RS*R's. the RS*R springs are the closest to the 2004.5+ OEM spring rates
ocdavid
no, springs/shocks should not affect TCS
pp
yes, the D-specs would be a good choice to match with these springs. although i have no personal experience, members on the forum have reported that the D-specs have suitable adjustment range that should include the spring rates of the RS*R's. the RS*R springs are the closest to the 2004.5+ OEM spring rates
ocdavid
no, springs/shocks should not affect TCS
pp
Originally Posted by palepony
mikerz,
yes, the D-specs would be a good choice to match with these springs. although i have no personal experience, members on the forum have reported that the D-specs have suitable adjustment range that should include the spring rates of the RS*R's. the RS*R springs are the closest to the 2004.5+ OEM spring rates
ocdavid
no, springs/shocks should not affect TCS
pp
yes, the D-specs would be a good choice to match with these springs. although i have no personal experience, members on the forum have reported that the D-specs have suitable adjustment range that should include the spring rates of the RS*R's. the RS*R springs are the closest to the 2004.5+ OEM spring rates
ocdavid
no, springs/shocks should not affect TCS
pp
Palepony, Thanks ... Happy Thanksgiving to all
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Lt_Ballzacki
Brakes & Suspension
39
Aug 6, 2021 06:19 AM




