Notices
Brakes & Suspension 350Z stoppers, coils, shocks/dampers

Megan Racing Coilovers

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-08-2006, 03:11 PM
  #61  
TakeiteZ
Registered User
 
TakeiteZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Fairfax/NoVa
Posts: 174
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

i am currently running the megans and can say that they are a good bang-for-the-buck set up... for that money i would rather run the megans than the tein basics any day.

with that said, i don't track my car and am not worried about that. another thing i like about the megans is the ability to pre-load the springs so that the coilover still has full shock travel even when the car is lowered.

i have my set up at 12 clicks from full stiff all around, and hotchkis sway bars set at mid stiff front and full stiff rear (to give the car a bit more oversteer since i have a 2" stagger for my wheels), and the car handles pretty accurately.

I got the clunk noise from the rear a little too... but i went back there and tightened up the mount that holds the spare tire into place and the noise seemed to go down a bit? maybe its just psycological, but i thought it made a difference.

all in all... im happy with them. they might not be THE best coilovers out there... but for the money, i can't complain. (not to mention the 2 year warranty!)
Old 07-08-2006, 05:39 PM
  #62  
bleunetizen
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
bleunetizen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: nz
Posts: 333
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

replaced the rear top mount with stock one, the clunking noise is gone. lets wait and see how long it takes to wear out the front pillowballs..
Old 07-08-2006, 05:46 PM
  #63  
lex350
Registered User
iTrader: (16)
 
lex350's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 661
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I've had mine on the car for a few months now and I'm still very happy with how the car rides. I have them set at 10 around and sometimes I get the noise from the rears but It does not seem to last very long.
Old 07-08-2006, 05:49 PM
  #64  
JETPILOT
New Member
iTrader: (51)
 
JETPILOT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Vero Beach, FL
Posts: 6,319
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Preloading the spring is not the right way to lower a car, and it does not allow for full shock travel. The more preload the higher the stroke of the piston in the bore. A shock with an adjustable shock body to change height is the correct way to raise or lower your car.

Respect
JET
Old 08-16-2006, 06:27 PM
  #65  
Gilley
Registered User
iTrader: (12)
 
Gilley's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 660
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Any update on pros and cons? It appears that the Megan coilovers are made by BC Racing and can be found at a price comparable to the Tein Basics. http://www.bcracing-na.com/

I'm considering the BC/Megans. My other option is to go with Tokico D-specs and S.techs. Any thoughts?
Old 08-17-2006, 09:37 PM
  #66  
Gsedan35
New Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Gsedan35's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Central California
Posts: 3,121
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Pro's would be the full height adjustability. I do love having really great shock piston travel, can't say the same thing for regular shocks on with the same drop amount. Con's would be valving. What it happiness on the street because you set them softer, is shear misery on the highway and vise versa. I"m at 4 clicks from full stiff with the 448lbs springs on the front and oem 427lbs rates in the rear on cut down oem upper spring seats all set up with a 1"/.8" drop. When I set the dampning any softer, I get all kinds of secondary action on the highway that drives me nuts. Would be a good candidate for them to add on a EDFC like system.

IMO, get the D-spec/S-tech combo. In comparison they are valved a whole lot better.
Old 08-17-2006, 10:52 PM
  #67  
Changvi
New Member
iTrader: (66)
 
Changvi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Somewhere
Posts: 3,453
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

i am currently running the megans and can say that they are a good bang-for-the-buck set up... for that money i would rather run the megans than the tein basics any day.
LOL....yeah, ok.
Old 08-18-2006, 01:01 AM
  #68  
ReV2Red
I haz da turbos
Thread Starter
iTrader: (9)
 
ReV2Red's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: In the basement
Posts: 1,621
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Changvi
LOL....yeah, ok.
Instead of posting a dumbass remark, why don't you give legitimate reasoning to your thought.
Old 08-18-2006, 06:37 AM
  #69  
Gilley
Registered User
iTrader: (12)
 
Gilley's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 660
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

How do you convert the metric kg spring rates (10 and 8 kgs for these) to lbs for an even comparison?

I know a kg is about 2.2 pounds, so my math makes the rates 22 and 17.6.
Old 08-18-2006, 06:44 AM
  #70  
Changvi
New Member
iTrader: (66)
 
Changvi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Somewhere
Posts: 3,453
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Instead of posting a dumbass remark, why don't you give legitimate reasoning to your thought.
Tein>Megan.....anyday
Old 08-18-2006, 06:13 PM
  #71  
Gsedan35
New Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Gsedan35's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Central California
Posts: 3,121
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Gilley
How do you convert the metric kg spring rates (10 and 8 kgs for these) to lbs for an even comparison?

I know a kg is about 2.2 pounds, so my math makes the rates 22 and 17.6.
1Kg = 56lbs

so 10Kg =560lbs
and 8Kg =448lbs
Old 08-18-2006, 06:48 PM
  #72  
first350
Registered User
iTrader: (24)
 
first350's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: NewCastle, WA
Posts: 2,947
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Gsedan35
1Kg = 56lbs

so 10Kg =560lbs
and 8Kg =448lbs
same basic #'s, but a little more accurate

1 in = 25.4 mm
1 Kg = 2.2 lbs

1 [Kg/mm] * (25.4 [mm/in])*(2.2[lbs/Kg]) = 55.88 [lbs/in]

spring rates are force per distance (i.e. a 8 Kg/mm spring compressed 1 mm will create a 8 Kg force in the opposite direction that it was compressed)

-Peter
Old 08-19-2006, 03:09 AM
  #73  
Gilley
Registered User
iTrader: (12)
 
Gilley's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 660
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Thanks guys. I had half of the equation. Now I can compare apples to apples.

So a 478 pound spring should really be indicated as a 478 pound/inch spring?

This conversion info should go in the big spring sticky since a few other coilovers seem to use metric rates too.
Old 08-20-2006, 11:05 PM
  #74  
Fa1rLadyZ
Registered User
 
Fa1rLadyZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Socal.
Posts: 241
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

My friend just got one for his Z for awesome price. Quality of this coil is great and if you are planning to purchase one, give me a pm and maybe i can hook you up with good price. planning to purchase one for myself soon...
Old 12-08-2006, 07:21 PM
  #75  
JdMfREaK
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
JdMfREaK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Florida
Posts: 130
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

the only b!tch name on my car is my FAIRLADYZ(emblem) other then that no other girl names on my ****
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Lt_Ballzacki
Brakes & Suspension
39
08-06-2021 06:19 AM
ars88
Zs & Gs For Sale
18
04-04-2016 07:52 AM
Stevo Z
SoCal Marketplace
4
10-03-2015 09:14 PM



Quick Reply: Megan Racing Coilovers



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:25 PM.