JIC rear camber arms
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (24)
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 2,947
Likes: 0
From: NewCastle, WA
got these installed before my alignment...super easy to install, fitment and quality is great. Aligment shop said that the camber arms were used to get the correct Toe and camber..so I'm very happy!
alignment specs:
Front Driver/Passenger:
camber -1.6 / -2.1
Toe 0.03 / 0.03 in
Rear Driver/Passenger:
camber -2.4 / -2.4
Toe 0.05 / 0.06 in
I'm lowered about 2" on JIC 2 coilovers.
here's some pics:
still in the box

installed:


OE
alignment specs:
Front Driver/Passenger:
camber -1.6 / -2.1
Toe 0.03 / 0.03 in
Rear Driver/Passenger:
camber -2.4 / -2.4
Toe 0.05 / 0.06 in
I'm lowered about 2" on JIC 2 coilovers.
here's some pics:
still in the box

installed:


OE
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (24)
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 2,947
Likes: 0
From: NewCastle, WA
Originally Posted by Advent7
I didn't know you could adjust the toe with this kit. I thought you would have to get the toe bolt....hmm.
Can't go wrong with JIC.
Can't go wrong with JIC.
IIRC it's main function is camber, but when my alignment guy was trying to get the correct toe, he had to add a little bit of extra negative camber from what I had specified to get the Toe I wanted (Toe was more important to me...it should make a big difference in autoXing)
*when I had bring in the car and said that I had JIC camber arms, he commented on how he likes them. So far, I have their coilovers, camber arms, CF strut bar, and race bucket seat...all have been high quality and fitment superb.
Originally Posted by first350
IIRC it's main function is camber, but when my alignment guy was trying to get the correct toe, he had to add a little bit of extra negative camber from what I had specified to get the Toe I wanted (Toe was more important to me...it should make a big difference in autoXing)
*when I had bring in the car and said that I had JIC camber arms, he commented on how he likes them. So far, I have their coilovers, camber arms, CF strut bar, and race bucket seat...all have been high quality and fitment superb.
*when I had bring in the car and said that I had JIC camber arms, he commented on how he likes them. So far, I have their coilovers, camber arms, CF strut bar, and race bucket seat...all have been high quality and fitment superb.
Your car is going to handle like sh*t with those camber settings. -2.0 Front and -1.0 Rear are descent camber settings. Having more negative camber in the rear is going to create a lot of oversteer. The Z likes more negative camber in the front than the rear. You need SPC toe adjustment bolts.
JET
JET
Trending Topics
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (24)
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 2,947
Likes: 0
From: NewCastle, WA
Originally Posted by redlude97
Peter, where'd you have the alignment done and was that with you sitting in the driver's seat?
Originally Posted by JETPILOT
Your car is going to handle like sh*t with those camber settings. -2.0 Front and -1.0 Rear are descent camber settings. Having more negative camber in the rear is going to create a lot of oversteer. The Z likes more negative camber in the front than the rear. You need SPC toe adjustment bolts.
JET
JET
Last edited by first350; May 20, 2007 at 06:58 AM.
Originally Posted by JETPILOT
Your car is going to handle like sh*t with those camber settings. -2.0 Front and -1.0 Rear are descent camber settings. Having more negative camber in the rear is going to create a lot of oversteer. The Z likes more negative camber in the front than the rear. You need SPC toe adjustment bolts.
JET
JET
in actality of the z, having more negative camber on the rear than the front will make the z turn in quick(a lil oversteer), but the car will want to understeer a little more coming off the corners.
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (24)
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 2,947
Likes: 0
From: NewCastle, WA
Originally Posted by daytona350z
you need to stop preaching about theory about "what the z likes". after all it isnt what the car itself likes, its how the driver wants the car to be.
in actality of the z, having more negative camber on the rear than the front will make the z turn in quick(a lil oversteer), but the car will want to understeer a little more coming off the corners.
in actality of the z, having more negative camber on the rear than the front will make the z turn in quick(a lil oversteer), but the car will want to understeer a little more coming off the corners.
so far the Z 'feels' like it has better turn-in for AutoX...it also feels more lively on the freeway (from what I understand, lower toe-in will do that...some autoX only cars actualy run some toe-out
[which would not be suitable/safe for highway use])
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Lt_Ballzacki
Brakes & Suspension
39
Aug 6, 2021 06:19 AM
350Z Project X
Suspension
9
Oct 10, 2015 09:23 AM





