Notices
Brakes & Suspension 350Z stoppers, coils, shocks/dampers

SPL rear mid-link review and install

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 25, 2008 | 11:28 AM
  #21  
RedBullRR's Avatar
RedBullRR
New Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,215
Likes: 9
From: New York
Default

Love how slammed your car is. Def look sick!
Reply
Old Jan 25, 2008 | 10:40 PM
  #22  
Gsedan35's Avatar
Gsedan35
New Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 3,121
Likes: 7
From: Central California
Default

Originally Posted by kuah@splparts.com
Tony is using the dampers from his Stance coilovers, with the springs removed. There should be no difference in the performance of the dampers, as the motion/velocities seen at the shock should be similar regardless whether the spring is mounted on the damper or at the mid link (with equivalent spring rates given the motion ratio difference).
Interesting to see your conversion calculator, looks like you've measured the rear motion rate at around .776.

http://www.splparts.com/main3/Parts/...Calculator.xls

465lbs X .776 X .776 = 280lbs
Reply
Old Jan 28, 2008 | 06:39 AM
  #23  
kuah@splparts.com's Avatar
kuah@splparts.com
Vendor - Former Vendor
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 221
Likes: 0
From: Austin TX
Default

Originally Posted by Gsedan35
Interesting to see your conversion calculator, looks like you've measured the rear motion rate at around .776.

http://www.splparts.com/main3/Parts/...Calculator.xls

465lbs X .776 X .776 = 280lbs
The motion ratio is approx. 0.6. I made a mistake in not squaring the motion ratio when calculating the effective spring rates. The Stance and Buddy club coilovers should have an effective rate of slightly less (due to mounting angle) than 13.5kg/mm at the stock location.
Reply
Old Jan 28, 2008 | 07:58 AM
  #24  
gothchick's Avatar
gothchick
Registered User
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 3,300
Likes: 1
From: ATL
Default

Wow, thanks for the great review & pics! :-)
Reply
Old Jan 28, 2008 | 05:26 PM
  #25  
thinking's Avatar
thinking
Registered User
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 248
Likes: 0
From: Right Here
Default

FYI, he indicates a similar calculation of .61
Originally Posted by Q45tech
I measured the FRONT lower arm length @14" and the spring closest point [length along arm from frame] @11" this results in a spring to wheel correction of 0.61 so a spring speced at 300 pounds per inch would really expert 300 x 0.61= 183 pounds per wheel inch. If you jacked up the wheel by 1" it would require 183 more pounds than static...........discounting sway bars this means the front roll rate stiffness is ~~183 lbs per inch.

So a 20% stiffer spring only truely increases FRONT roll stiffness by 20 x 0.61 or 12.2%.

Worse add in the sway bar and a 20% stiffer spring may only add 1/2 -3/4 so 6-9%.

Last edited by thinking; Jan 28, 2008 at 05:30 PM.
Reply
Old Jan 30, 2008 | 09:51 AM
  #26  
Gsedan35's Avatar
Gsedan35
New Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 3,121
Likes: 7
From: Central California
Default

Originally Posted by thinking
FYI, he indicates a similar calculation of .61
He's talking about the front, not the rear. I trust Hippie's numbers more anyhow.
Reply
Old Mar 13, 2008 | 12:07 PM
  #27  
RKnight's Avatar
RKnight
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 273
Likes: 0
From: Anaheim Hills
Default

Twenzel what spring lenth and rate did you use? I am planning to use a softer 6 kg/mm 7" Swift spring to replace the 5.9 kg/mm Hotchkis spring in the rear.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
350Z Project X
Suspension
9
Oct 10, 2015 09:23 AM
nanotech
Exhaust
6
Oct 2, 2015 05:02 AM
samansharif
Brakes & Suspension
1
Sep 25, 2015 12:31 PM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:34 AM.