Notices
Brakes & Suspension 350Z stoppers, coils, shocks/dampers

Camber specs? (daily and track)

Old Nov 11, 2008 | 12:26 PM
  #1  
bighungrydewees's Avatar
bighungrydewees
Thread Starter
New Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
From: Madison, MS
Default Camber specs? (daily and track)

I have a 1.5" drop on Bilstein Coilovers and will be installing a set of anti-roll bars soon. I have all the required camber and toe adjustment items installed also. >

What is a good balance b/w handling for autox and daily driving so I don't have to readjust before events?

Thanks guys.
Curtis
Reply
Old Nov 11, 2008 | 02:07 PM
  #2  
Beau's Avatar
Beau
Registered User
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 434
Likes: 1
From: Asheville, NC
Default

What size tires are you running? Staggered or not?

It's really up to the individual driver, but a good starting point would be:

Front

-1.5* camber

0 toe

Rear

-1.5* camber

.03 toe in

Play with it from there. Too bad alignments cost so much money!
Reply
Old Nov 11, 2008 | 05:27 PM
  #3  
bighungrydewees's Avatar
bighungrydewees
Thread Starter
New Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
From: Madison, MS
Default

I agree on the cost. (This will be 3rd alignment)
I was previously running -1.8 on front and -2.5 in the back. Figure I need more negative up front.

Yokohama Advan RS wheels; Front-18x9, 29mm offset, Rear-18x10, 25mm offset
255/45-18
285/40-18


Last edited by bighungrydewees; Nov 25, 2008 at 01:04 PM.
Reply
Old Nov 12, 2008 | 10:21 AM
  #4  
WTX350Z's Avatar
WTX350Z
Registered User
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,291
Likes: 1
From: Midland, TX
Default

I personally don't like -2.5 over drive wheels...but for track/daily multi use I would probably go with somewhere around Fr -1.8 RR -2.2

street only I'd drop it down a little less aggressive to like -1.5 / -2.0 respectively.

I generally don't like greater than .5 deg. difference front to rear. but I do want some difference...not a fan of square setups...but this is purely a personal preference.

keeping toe near Zero will prevent premature tire death.

Why do you figure you need more up front? tire heat across the tread? handling characteristics? any data behind this?
Reply
Old Nov 12, 2008 | 11:37 AM
  #5  
Twenty4's Avatar
Twenty4
Registered User
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 414
Likes: 0
From: newbury park, CA
Default

i would also like more peoples inputs on this matter, once i get my coilovers on im gunna be messing with camber/toe quite a bit
Reply
Old Nov 12, 2008 | 11:58 AM
  #6  
Beau's Avatar
Beau
Registered User
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 434
Likes: 1
From: Asheville, NC
Default

Running rear toe IN can make the car more stable in high speed turns, under hard braking, and when you are tipping into the gas on corner exit though. I always run a little toe IN in the rear. 0 toe in the front.
Reply
Old Nov 12, 2008 | 12:20 PM
  #7  
sfarrah's Avatar
sfarrah
Registered User
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 800
Likes: 0
From: Austin
Default

My rule of thumb is -2 to 2.5 front and -1 to 1.5 for a dual purpose setup. Zero toe up front and minimal toe rear as suggested above. Depends how aggressive you want to be and how much tire wear you are willing to sacrifice for handling.
Reply
Old Nov 12, 2008 | 12:46 PM
  #8  
Beau's Avatar
Beau
Registered User
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 434
Likes: 1
From: Asheville, NC
Default

Originally Posted by sfarrah
My rule of thumb is -2 to 2.5 front and -1 to 1.5 for a dual purpose setup. Zero toe up front and minimal toe rear as suggested above. Depends how aggressive you want to be and how much tire wear you are willing to sacrifice for handling.
Would you run that alignment with a staggered setup or a square setup? How is the handling at low speed vs. high speed? I.E. does it handle fairly neutral at all speeds or is it nimble at low speeds and twitchy at high speeds, or understeering at low speeds and neutral at high speeds?

I've been theorizing for awhile and would like to hear real world input.
Reply
Old Nov 12, 2008 | 10:08 PM
  #9  
Murfdizzle21's Avatar
Murfdizzle21
Registered User
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,093
Likes: 0
From: Palm Beach Gardens, Florida
Default

what camber should you run if you just want it for ur daily driver on springs, who wants their tires to last as long as possible? staggered rims (19's), 1.2 drop...????
Reply
Old Nov 14, 2008 | 08:55 AM
  #10  
bighungrydewees's Avatar
bighungrydewees
Thread Starter
New Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
From: Madison, MS
Default

Originally Posted by WTX350Z
I personally don't like -2.5 over drive wheels...but for track/daily multi use I would probably go with somewhere around Fr -1.8 RR -2.2

street only I'd drop it down a little less aggressive to like -1.5 / -2.0 respectively.

I generally don't like greater than .5 deg. difference front to rear. but I do want some difference...not a fan of square setups...but this is purely a personal preference.

keeping toe near Zero will prevent premature tire death.

Why do you figure you need more up front? tire heat across the tread? handling characteristics? any data behind this?
I guess I assumed more negative camber up front was necessary to improve turn in and since the front of the Z is a little heavier. Thanks for the input though, I'm liking what you've said. (I'm leaning -2 front/-2.2 back)

edit> The main reason I'm leaning towards -2 up front is that I'll be tucking 275's in the near future and I feel that it's not too agressive.

Last edited by bighungrydewees; Nov 14, 2008 at 09:19 AM.
Reply
Old Nov 14, 2008 | 09:13 AM
  #11  
bighungrydewees's Avatar
bighungrydewees
Thread Starter
New Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
From: Madison, MS
Default

Originally Posted by Si3lv5er0Z
what camber should you run if you just want it for ur daily driver on springs, who wants their tires to last as long as possible? staggered rims (19's), 1.2 drop...????

After looking into this the past week, I might could give you some insight.
As long as your offsets aren't so agressive that your trying to tuck your wheels and tires into your fender lip, I would say -1.5 front and rear.

Hey guys ... someone else with more nowledge chime in on this, for all I know -1 might be a better choice in his case. My front tires (which have been -1.8 up till this point) have actually been wearing nicely.

Last edited by bighungrydewees; Nov 25, 2008 at 01:06 PM.
Reply
Old Nov 25, 2008 | 01:07 PM
  #12  
bighungrydewees's Avatar
bighungrydewees
Thread Starter
New Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
From: Madison, MS
Default

What caster specifications should our suspension be run at? Should it be different for street/racing?
Reply
Old Nov 25, 2008 | 02:05 PM
  #13  
Beau's Avatar
Beau
Registered User
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 434
Likes: 1
From: Asheville, NC
Default

Caster isn't adjustable unless you get the SPL A-arms. For now that is the only way to adjust it as far as I know. We have a pretty good amount of caster built in already from what the guy said who did my alignment. He was pretty impressed.
Reply
Old Nov 26, 2008 | 09:58 AM
  #14  
bighungrydewees's Avatar
bighungrydewees
Thread Starter
New Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
From: Madison, MS
Default

Originally Posted by Beau
Caster isn't adjustable unless you get the SPL A-arms. For now that is the only way to adjust it as far as I know. We have a pretty good amount of caster built in already from what the guy said who did my alignment. He was pretty impressed.

I could probably get the SPL caster adjustment shims seperately is the reason I asked. But, I just don't know much about caster. Last time I had my car's alignment and camber adjusted the machine said caster was 8.5 front left and 9.3 front right. That's with -1.9 camber left and -1.8 camber right. Once again, my car has like a 1.5" drop.

Did he not turn the wheel all the way when he checked for caster? (do you even turn the wheel to check?)

Thanks for the input Beau.
Reply
Old Nov 30, 2008 | 10:35 PM
  #15  
wutafobb's Avatar
wutafobb
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 157
Likes: 0
From: Vancouver
Default

Will alignment tell you if your suspension is screw up or not?
Reply
Old Dec 1, 2008 | 12:57 AM
  #16  
350Zdj's Avatar
350Zdj
New Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,914
Likes: 5
From: Dubai
Default

Originally Posted by sfarrah
My rule of thumb is -2 to 2.5 front and -1 to 1.5 for a dual purpose setup. Zero toe up front and minimal toe rear as suggested above. Depends how aggressive you want to be and how much tire wear you are willing to sacrifice for handling.
+1 on this.

Mine was 1" dropped, 225 18 front and 255 18 rear. I had the same question before. What i did was I kept all my alignment as close to 0 as possible then went to attend a track evening on a brand spanking new set of rubbers. I pushed the car very hard on corners. The Z understeers like hell, and it makes you go like "WTF!?!"!

I suspect the Z understeers bcoz it has narrower tyres at the front. The -2 camber up front should help take care of this. Otherwise, increase the front tyre pressure / soften front suspension / lower front height / use wider tyres up front etc. etc. More options are available if u really don't want to kill your tyres quickly.

So anyways. after the 1 hour event, i inspected the tyres. The wear on the them showed i needed just about the same setting as sfarrah mentioned there.
So yea. Just thought my case could help you decide, bighungrydewees.

good luck dude

Last edited by 350Zdj; Dec 1, 2008 at 01:14 AM.
Reply
Old Dec 1, 2008 | 04:47 AM
  #17  
Beau's Avatar
Beau
Registered User
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 434
Likes: 1
From: Asheville, NC
Default

Originally Posted by wutafobb
Will alignment tell you if your suspension is screw up or not?
Only if it can't be put back in alignment. Then you have something bent or a bushing that needs replaced most likely. If your handling is acting funny lately, but your alignment is fine, then you need to do some research or start another thread.
Reply
Old Dec 1, 2008 | 05:00 AM
  #18  
Beau's Avatar
Beau
Registered User
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 434
Likes: 1
From: Asheville, NC
Default

Originally Posted by bighungrydewees
Did he not turn the wheel all the way when he checked for caster? (do you even turn the wheel to check?)

Thanks for the input Beau.
Sorry I missed this one until now.

When you do an alignment the machine gives you step by step instructions for calibrating the heads. The caster calibration is done by turning the wheels left and right when the machine tells the operator to do so. IF the tech does it right and the machine itself is in calibration, then it should be perfect or so close that it doesn't matter. It's easy to be lazy and screw up an alignment. Could be way off, could be minor. You get what you pay for with alignments.
Reply
Old Dec 1, 2008 | 08:42 AM
  #19  
bighungrydewees's Avatar
bighungrydewees
Thread Starter
New Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
From: Madison, MS
Default

Thanks again guys.

I couldn't agree more with Beau on the techs being lazy and probably not caring. I do have good news though. My next alignment will be done at a shop that our company helped build, so they should be pretty open to me working with the tech. I'll try not to get on his nerves, but I am gonna double check everything.

Oh ya, I think I'll stop stressing about my caster being different left to right since guy probably did something wrong anywho.

Last edited by bighungrydewees; Dec 1, 2008 at 08:45 AM.
Reply
Old Feb 8, 2009 | 10:27 AM
  #20  
Colin_S's Avatar
Colin_S
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 204
Likes: 0
From: Scotland
Default

This is a good thread and i'm going for another alignment so thought i'd bring it to the top to see if anyone else had anything to add.
Reply

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:50 AM.