Notices
Brakes & Suspension 350Z stoppers, coils, shocks/dampers

Spring rates?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-23-2004, 09:56 PM
  #21  
Gsedan35
New Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Gsedan35's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Central California
Posts: 3,121
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Originally posted by Resolute
Front ratio is 0.79. What do you mean about coil-overs having a motion ratio of 1?
Yeah that doesn't make sense to me. Even the Cusco coilovers use the oem rear spring location, not on the dampner body (saw them with my own eye's at a meet).

How does that work with the rear motion ratio at .36? Does that mean that if a 100lbs spring rate is in place that the effective leverage applied at the wheel equal's a 36lbs spring rate at the wheel and the same spring at the front leverages 79lbs?
Old 02-24-2004, 03:35 AM
  #22  
dwnshift
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
dwnshift's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Cincinnati
Posts: 1,514
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

The front rates what I got I am not really sure how accurate .............because the "pigtail" is more pronounced on them and they dont fit into the perch. I am going to try it again today and take pictures.
Old 02-24-2004, 10:36 AM
  #23  
Resolute
New Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Resolute's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: @7000 ft
Posts: 2,097
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally posted by Gsedan35
Yeah that doesn't make sense to me. Even the Cusco coilovers use the oem rear spring location, not on the dampner body (saw them with my own eye's at a meet).
Doesn't make sense to me either. I have yet to see coil-overs that do not use the stock mounting points.

How does that work with the rear motion ratio at .36? Does that mean that if a 100lbs spring rate is in place that the effective leverage applied at the wheel equal's a 36lbs spring rate at the wheel and the same spring at the front leverages 79lbs?
Exactly. I have not measured the rears myself, but the wheel certainly has significant leverage on the spring being so inboard of the wheel hub. The beauty lies in the ability for stiffer springs to control body roll and wt. dist. without making the wheel rate too high to maintain full travel over irregularities.
EDIT: I'm a retard and couldn't figure out quotes

Last edited by Resolute; 02-24-2004 at 10:40 AM.
Old 02-24-2004, 05:30 PM
  #24  
dwnshift
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
dwnshift's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Cincinnati
Posts: 1,514
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

From the informations I have received in our quest for a spring package with the Konis...
The Eibachs are actaully about 85-90% linear
rates are 387 front and 430 rear.
The OEM rear rate is 340ish.
Old 02-24-2004, 08:43 PM
  #25  
Gsedan35
New Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Gsedan35's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Central California
Posts: 3,121
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Originally posted by dwnshift
From the informations I have received in our quest for a spring package with the Konis...
The Eibachs are actaully about 85-90% linear
rates are 387 front and 430 rear.
The OEM rear rate is 340ish.
Your quoting the peak eibach rates, but they still have a significant rate spread between the initial rate and the final rate of 296/384 front 316/421 rear, (anyone can call them and get their spring rates to confirm), that's nearly a 100lbs spread that you'll experience. While cornering one side of the car is sprung at 384lbs front 421lbs rear while the other side of the car is at 296lbs front and 421lbs rear. Still too much of a performance compromise in the pursuit of ride quality.
Old 02-25-2004, 03:42 AM
  #26  
dwnshift
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
dwnshift's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Cincinnati
Posts: 1,514
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Just passing information
Old 03-03-2004, 04:34 AM
  #27  
Zship
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Zship's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: NJ
Posts: 77
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

BJ,

Did you ever get a chance to measure the OEM fronts?

Thanks!
Old 03-03-2004, 05:39 AM
  #28  
dwnshift
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
dwnshift's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Cincinnati
Posts: 1,514
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I couldnt get an accurate reading on the fronts. I talked to the guys at motorsport and they couldnt find them either. Still looking.
BJ
Old 03-03-2004, 09:18 AM
  #29  
Gsedan35
New Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Gsedan35's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Central California
Posts: 3,121
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

The rates coming off BJ's spring tester differing from the rates I got, made me curious. I dusted off my boxed set of oem 2003 350Z springs and had another look. I hadn't written down all the previous measurements, so I measured them again, and again, and again,.........you get the idea. And this time I did not ask for someone else to do the rate math, found this neat web site that does it. http://www.racingpc.com/tips/coils-springs.htm



Front springs:
33/64" wire diameter (measured on all active coils)
spring Outside Diameter 4.5"
Number of active coils 5
Spring rate 314lbs




*******************************************

Rear springs:
35/64" wire diameter (measured on all active coils)
spring Outside Diameter 5.0625"
Number of active coils 4
Spring rate 342lbs



So needless to see, I have new oem rates.
314/342
Old 03-03-2004, 10:08 AM
  #30  
Zship
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Zship's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: NJ
Posts: 77
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Thanks Gsedan35.

It didn't make sense that Eibach would end up at a similar rate to the OEM springs. They usually end up 20-25% stiffer than OEM.

Last edited by Zship; 03-03-2004 at 10:12 AM.
Old 12-07-2004, 09:41 AM
  #31  
jchen1020
Registered User
 
jchen1020's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Seattle
Posts: 119
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Anyone heard of B&G Spring?
What is the Spring rate on that?
Old 12-07-2004, 11:34 AM
  #32  
Gsedan35
New Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Gsedan35's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Central California
Posts: 3,121
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Originally posted by jchen1020
Anyone heard of B&G Spring?
What is the Spring rate on that?
I haven't bothered to call them, so I don't have their rates. They did tell me spring rates in the past, but so did Sprint, who now refuse to give out rates. H&R is another company that refuses to give out rates. If they can't give that out, how can anyone make a informed buying decision, just a shot in the dark, I don't think so.

If you want to find out the B&G rates I suggest that you give them a ring. Do not accept a generic "oh they are 20% stiffer". You need to know the specific rates or the info is totally uselesss.

Last edited by Gsedan35; 12-07-2004 at 11:37 AM.
Old 12-08-2004, 04:45 PM
  #33  
jchen1020
Registered User
 
jchen1020's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Seattle
Posts: 119
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally posted by Gsedan35
I haven't bothered to call them, so I don't have their rates. They did tell me spring rates in the past, but so did Sprint, who now refuse to give out rates. H&R is another company that refuses to give out rates. If they can't give that out, how can anyone make a informed buying decision, just a shot in the dark, I don't think so.

If you want to find out the B&G rates I suggest that you give them a ring. Do not accept a generic "oh they are 20% stiffer". You need to know the specific rates or the info is totally uselesss.
Thank you so much for your advise. I have bilstein shocks, I currently use H tech, they suck. Anyways, I will call B&G. I already bought them, have not put it on yet. I hope they work well with Bilsteins. I heard Bilstein HD is different from KONI Yellows. What is the difference other than one is adjustable and other is not. How is the quality? I just have the Bilstein Shocks, it is called HD OEM Performance. Not PSS system. Any advise?
Old 05-01-2005, 11:59 AM
  #34  
Major
Registered User
 
Major's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Yuma AZ
Posts: 106
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Spring Rates

Why is it "Linear" Spring rates are preferable to "Progressive" Spring rates. I know the difference but not sure why one is preferred over the other. Racing application versus a street application?

Thanks
Major
Old 05-02-2005, 11:32 AM
  #35  
jchen1020
Registered User
 
jchen1020's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Seattle
Posts: 119
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Linear is good with a nice stiffer shock. Progressive is better with a soft shock.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Lt_Ballzacki
Brakes & Suspension
39
08-06-2021 06:19 AM
MM'08_350Z
VQ35HR
225
04-22-2021 09:42 PM
EnjukuRacing
Engine
0
09-30-2015 06:55 AM
Detailed Image
Cleaning & Detailing
0
09-28-2015 03:03 AM



Quick Reply: Spring rates?



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:34 PM.