analyzing my alignment results...
06-17-2004, 04:04 PM
#1
Registered User
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: CA
Posts: 156
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
analyzing my alignment results...
How bad?
Final readings:
left front: right front:
caster +8.88 +9.04
camber -1.40 -1.80
toe +1/16 +1/16
left rear: right rear:
camber -2.44 -2.28
toe +1/16 +1/16
total toe:
front +1/8
rear +1/18
Final readings:
left front: right front:
caster +8.88 +9.04
camber -1.40 -1.80
toe +1/16 +1/16
left rear: right rear:
camber -2.44 -2.28
toe +1/16 +1/16
total toe:
front +1/8
rear +1/18
06-20-2004, 06:30 PM
#4
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: bradenton florida
Posts: 1,056
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
you need toe in to keep from feathering(supossedly). you need a total toe in of .08(in) or .2*in the front....your camber is pretty heavy too, probably handles nice but will eat up your inner tire edges pretty quik, unless you requested that purposely for track duty...........
-justin
-justin
06-21-2004, 08:54 AM
#6
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: bradenton florida
Posts: 1,056
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
yes, your camberis a tad heavy on the negative side. fronts arent too bad but herears are over 2* neg. this will eat your inner tires fast. since you lowered it you might need rear camber arms to get it back in spec thats what i did. i even run less aggressive camber than factory to save my $1000 tires.........
-justin
-justin
06-21-2004, 09:40 AM
#7
Registered User
iTrader: (16)
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: cali
Posts: 2,669
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
if you lower any more than .8 inches you will have camber problems. its a matter of how much its off and how much you want to spend to correct the problem. front camber components are not cheap.....and neither are your tires
Trending Topics
06-21-2004, 02:30 PM
#8
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: bradenton florida
Posts: 1,056
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
heck, none of the front or rear components were cheap but together they were less than a new set of tires! i look at it like this: suspension parts purchased once for full life of tires or unevenly wear your expensive tires & replace frequently forever!
depends on your wallet i guess.........
-justin
depends on your wallet i guess.........
-justin
06-21-2004, 09:39 PM
#10
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Southern California
Posts: 1,737
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: analyzing my alignment results...
Originally posted by krazE
How bad?
Final readings:
left front: right front:
caster +8.88 +9.04
camber -1.40 -1.80
toe +1/16 +1/16
left rear: right rear:
camber -2.44 -2.28
toe +1/16 +1/16
total toe:
front +1/8
rear +1/18
How bad?
Final readings:
left front: right front:
caster +8.88 +9.04
camber -1.40 -1.80
toe +1/16 +1/16
left rear: right rear:
camber -2.44 -2.28
toe +1/16 +1/16
total toe:
front +1/8
rear +1/18
How about this?
left front: right front:
caster +10 +10
camber -1.40 -1.40
toe +1/32 +1/32
left rear: right rear:
camber -2.00 -2.00
toe +1/32 +1/32
total toe:
front +1/16
rear +1/16
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
The car has Hotchkis Springs Sways
And Hotchkis ProtoType Camber rods..
Manual alignment.. 5000 miles on new NNA provided tires.. Some
Front feathering - outside when at 1/8th total... Inside at 1/16 total...last 3000 miles...
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
user 62082028
Southern California
11
07-28-2017 11:47 AM