13.8@103 (stock)
12-20-2003, 09:38 AM
#1
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 85
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
13.7@102 (stock)
My brother ran the 350Z today, I couldn't go, even tho I wish I could. But either way, I was just talking with him on the cellphone, and ran a 13.8@103mph, and a 13.7@102mph. Stock base 350Z. I'll let you updated if he runs anything faster.
Note, that the track just opened up, and he did not warm the tires up. Hopefully, if he can get the sixty down to 2.0, it's going to run mid 13's. 2.30 sixty so far.
Note, that the track just opened up, and he did not warm the tires up. Hopefully, if he can get the sixty down to 2.0, it's going to run mid 13's. 2.30 sixty so far.
Last edited by 1.8T; 12-20-2003 at 09:51 AM.
was he powershifting? was it windy outside?
12-20-2003, 02:53 PM
#3
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 85
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
No powershifting. It was cold, so he couldn't hook up as much as he'd like to. Maybe next week, we'll take it, heat the tires properly, and run it again. Hopefully mid 13's. No noticable wind. The track is at 500ft. sea-level tho. Low humidity.
Last edited by 1.8T; 12-20-2003 at 03:00 PM.
12-20-2003, 02:59 PM
#4
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 85
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Ok, here are the slip numbers: The 2.30 was on the first try with a 13.8@103, and the car heated after that, but the 60' was down.
2.13 60'
13.73@102.99mph
then
2.19 60'
13.85@102.64mph
and a
2.22 60'
13.85@102.78mph
If needed, I'll scan the slip. But the times are up, nontheless.
2.13 60'
13.73@102.99mph
then
2.19 60'
13.85@102.64mph
and a
2.22 60'
13.85@102.78mph
If needed, I'll scan the slip. But the times are up, nontheless.
12-24-2003, 12:49 PM
#7
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: South Texas
Posts: 495
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Congrats on your time!
Enron, you might be right but I had similiar times when I was stock and I own a performance. I think weather and altitude make the most difference. I ran 13.7 to 14.0 in 80+ degree weather in 90%+ humidity at sea level. Those times were stock and with mods. In 47 degrees and around 30% humidity I ran a 13.4. Only difference was weather.
Enron, you might be right but I had similiar times when I was stock and I own a performance. I think weather and altitude make the most difference. I ran 13.7 to 14.0 in 80+ degree weather in 90%+ humidity at sea level. Those times were stock and with mods. In 47 degrees and around 30% humidity I ran a 13.4. Only difference was weather.
Trending Topics
12-24-2003, 10:59 PM
#8
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Flushing
Posts: 746
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I noticed virtually all of these claimed 13 second stock cars do NOT post timeslips... which lead me to believe that they are skewing the numbers in their favor. I had a kid a while back brag that his cousin's touring 6MT ran a 13.5 at ATCO bone stock. Again, no timeslip. I'd love to see a timeslip backing up any claims that they can do under 13.9x bone stock.
12-25-2003, 01:16 PM
#9
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 85
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I have the slip. I acctually have 7 slips. I do not have a digital camera, nor a scanner. When I do scan them, I'll post them. But I'm not in the hurry to prove anything to anybody.
Last edited by 1.8T; 12-25-2003 at 01:21 PM.
12-25-2003, 08:35 PM
#13
Registered User
Join Date: May 2002
Location: texas
Posts: 1,169
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by themyst
I noticed virtually all of these claimed 13 second stock cars do NOT post timeslips... which lead me to believe that they are skewing the numbers in their favor. I had a kid a while back brag that his cousin's touring 6MT ran a 13.5 at ATCO bone stock. Again, no timeslip. I'd love to see a timeslip backing up any claims that they can do under 13.9x bone stock.
I noticed virtually all of these claimed 13 second stock cars do NOT post timeslips... which lead me to believe that they are skewing the numbers in their favor. I had a kid a while back brag that his cousin's touring 6MT ran a 13.5 at ATCO bone stock. Again, no timeslip. I'd love to see a timeslip backing up any claims that they can do under 13.9x bone stock.
stop being an *** and do a search
12-26-2003, 03:42 PM
#14
Turbo Whore
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: West suburbs of Chi-town
Posts: 7,303
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Originally posted by themyst
I noticed virtually all of these claimed 13 second stock cars do NOT post timeslips... which lead me to believe that they are skewing the numbers in their favor. I had a kid a while back brag that his cousin's touring 6MT ran a 13.5 at ATCO bone stock. Again, no timeslip. I'd love to see a timeslip backing up any claims that they can do under 13.9x bone stock.
I noticed virtually all of these claimed 13 second stock cars do NOT post timeslips... which lead me to believe that they are skewing the numbers in their favor. I had a kid a while back brag that his cousin's touring 6MT ran a 13.5 at ATCO bone stock. Again, no timeslip. I'd love to see a timeslip backing up any claims that they can do under 13.9x bone stock.
