Notices
Drag NHRA, IDRC, IHRA, NDRA

RSX s Vs 350z 1/4 video

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-22-2004, 03:23 AM
  #41  
Cyclone
Registered User
 
Cyclone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Loxahatchee
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

An RSX with a type R K20a engine will run low 14s stock, a type S with a stage 1 (cybernation) turbo, runs 12.5s. So a turbo type R should be running low 12s, if not 11s. The problem is always traction0
Old 03-22-2004, 03:27 AM
  #42  
Cyclone
Registered User
 
Cyclone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Loxahatchee
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Sorry for the double post - An RSX is an RSX, true, but I do have a friend with only hondata and CAI and he's ran 14.0 in a type S, and very capable of 13.9's - because when we race, it's almost dead even, if he's not up a half of a car length. It's been done. And I for one love the interior of an RSX, granted, though - our Z's have them on exterior design. An RSX lowered makes all the difference though.
Old 04-01-2004, 11:52 AM
  #43  
epix00
Registered User
 
epix00's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: south fl
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Ha this is funny, im just reading the forums and all of a sudden i see you guys arguing about rsx-s and z's because of my friend reuben. (rsx-s) The rsx-s is alot stronger and responds much better to mods than i thought a 2.0 liter could. Reuben is also a very good driver.
Old 04-02-2004, 09:57 PM
  #44  
aznkukuboi
Registered User
 
aznkukuboi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: **** off
Posts: 189
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

350z still better!
Old 04-09-2004, 05:31 AM
  #45  
mchapman
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
mchapman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,979
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default Re: Re: Re: Re: lol

Originally posted by got_jesus?
Yes but....it will still be just a RSX...

I can buy a nova for $1000 spend $4000 moding it...
and will spank any Honda or Z out there...

...but it will still be just a nova...

so what is your point...

If you are saying the RSX is in the same class or quality as the Z.... then I think you need to do more research bud...
I like this logic, im using it.

Also, In my opinion, I think that model looks very ugly, a serious step back for Honda in the looks department.

Last edited by mchapman; 04-09-2004 at 05:34 AM.
Old 04-13-2004, 10:07 AM
  #46  
703z
Registered User
 
703z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 144
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Ok, what model was the 350 in the video? Lets say it was a base, which a base model runs around $26000 completly base with no options. The RSX Type-S is $23000 fully loaded. The RSX Type-S in the viedo only had about $1000 in extra mods on his car. Which brings out the total to $24000 for the RSX. So a $2000 difference and still waxed that 3225lb fat bastered. Lets say he spends $3000 on a turbo which brings the total to $27000, whcih will wax any 350Z or Vett. While your still saving for your Z.
Your trying to compare a RSX to the Sports car of the Year, why are you still talking? thx~

I just smoked a porsche 911 turbo with my souped up pinto btw, my pinto is sooo much > then the porsche.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
liqalu04
Engine & Drivetrain
31
01-02-2022 12:58 PM
issyz
2003-2009 Nissan 350Z
6
07-02-2017 03:04 PM
wanderingstuden
Maintenance & Repair
6
01-28-2016 07:03 PM
Justin100
Intake Exhaust
26
11-29-2015 03:58 PM
350Z Project X
Suspension
9
10-10-2015 09:23 AM



Quick Reply: RSX s Vs 350z 1/4 video



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:37 AM.