Why do Z times seem slower than I would expect?
Thread Starter
Registered User
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 216
Likes: 0
From: Norfolk, Virginia, USA
Why do Z times seem slower than I would expect?
There have been posts with Zs in the low to mid 12s with FI. I have also seen posts with Zs that have FI that are getting 450 rwHP that should be about 540 HP at the crank. Don’t you think that with 450 rwHP the car should be in the low 11s to high 10s?
Re: Why do Z times seem slower than I would expect?
Originally posted by DavidD
There have been posts with Zs in the low to mid 12s with FI. I have also seen posts with Zs that have FI that are getting 450 rwHP that should be about 540 HP at the crank. Don’t you think that with 450 rwHP the car should be in the low 11s to high 10s?
There have been posts with Zs in the low to mid 12s with FI. I have also seen posts with Zs that have FI that are getting 450 rwHP that should be about 540 HP at the crank. Don’t you think that with 450 rwHP the car should be in the low 11s to high 10s?
I haven't seen an E.T. or trap posted of any Z with over 400whp.
Fairlady Stalker
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 2,860
Likes: 0
From: Studio City, CA
David,
If you're talking ET, then rubber makes the most difference. Especially when your talking about 350rwhp+ FI'ed Z. Stock tires and spinning through gears won't get you impressive times.
yeah and I haven't seen any 400rwhp time slips yet. Can't wait to see a few tho.
If you're talking ET, then rubber makes the most difference. Especially when your talking about 350rwhp+ FI'ed Z. Stock tires and spinning through gears won't get you impressive times.
yeah and I haven't seen any 400rwhp time slips yet. Can't wait to see a few tho.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
