Thinking of a fully built motor w/o FI
Originally Posted by lukesnyder
This will give you a idea what the cam gain is going to be. 8HP. http://www.zchickz.com/modbug1.htm
Last edited by rednezz; Jul 11, 2005 at 06:05 AM.
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (6)
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 3,682
Likes: 0
From: King of Materbation
Originally Posted by rednezz
Those are the Nismo R-tuned cams. The Nismo S1 cams(276/256) give around 30 rwhp with tuning. The problem with a fully built NA car is that it becomes less streetable the more you push for power. I have found with very radical cams the car will die sometimes under slow driving conditions. A good computer tune can help out but it still may have problems. Also if you go with high compression you may need to put higher octane fuel. So in my opinion it really isn't worth it for a daily driven car because of the inconvience. For track use I think it definitely is worth it.
Thats the reason I want some questions answered before I go ahead and start building this motor. I am going to be running 91. I have to be carefull with compression ratio b/c with a 12 to 1 I need at least 38% nitromethane per volume I would need to run a minimum of 105. motor octane. I would be sure that it wasn't going above 11:1 because that would be cutting it really close even running on 93 as a daily driver. So I am doing my research on what the Squish/CC of the motor will be after head gasket, head work, stoker kit ect ect.
Hopefully Tommy K will email me back today and hopfully already have all this reseached so my lazy *** doesnt have to pull out the calculator tonight
Last edited by EM-EFER; Jul 11, 2005 at 07:18 AM.
I wish I knew the calculations to decide exactly what the perfect cam is for my application (93 oct), I'm basically just judging based on other board members experiences at this point. I have a nice book discussing boost, Maximum Boost by Corky Bell, but haven't found one to answer my NA concerns. What book would you guys recommend to gain some knowledge on NA fundamentals and maybe some engine build-up basics?
Originally Posted by nis350ztt
Originally Posted by ALong
400 at the crank is do-able but expensive, 400rwhp is probably do-able also, but I cant see how it would be cheaper than an off the shelf turbo kit. Dont get me wrong, I prefer the NA route but dont kid yourself that it is going to be cheaper than a turbo kit. The JGTC GT300 350Z's put out around 450hp at the crank and we are talking a $40k-50k motor + $15k in electronics...
The GrandAm Cup racecars put out around 380hp+ at the crank and the motors cost at least $10k to build and use $10-15k in Motec electronics.
You can get a turbo kit installed for what, $8-9k?
Dont want to rain on your parade but you do need to be realistic, there is no way you are going to get the numbers that you want, in the cost range you are looking at unfortunately.
The GrandAm Cup racecars put out around 380hp+ at the crank and the motors cost at least $10k to build and use $10-15k in Motec electronics.
You can get a turbo kit installed for what, $8-9k?
Dont want to rain on your parade but you do need to be realistic, there is no way you are going to get the numbers that you want, in the cost range you are looking at unfortunately.
Oh -- that the JGTC Z does not have a VQ. It's a twin-turboed 300ZX 3.0L.
Originally Posted by Skrill
Also keep in mind that those GAC motors require frequent rebuilds.
Oh -- that the JGTC Z does not have a VQ. It's a twin-turboed 300ZX 3.0L.
Oh -- that the JGTC Z does not have a VQ. It's a twin-turboed 300ZX 3.0L.
VQ30DETT to be precise
300zx has VG engine, and it never run JGTC that I am aware
I am using Nismo S1 cams + nismo VTC units + nismo valve springs + motec + headers + cats + nismo exhaust + pulley and no problem with the street driving problem at all.... pulling out 217rwKW = 295rwHP on the loaded dyno dynamic dyno machine... so I guess 300rwHP is not that far anymore after I finish my intake mod (doing it now)...
cheers,
richie
cheers,
richie
Wow that seems like the same path I want to take. However I can't afford to go all in right now. If you could recommend one mod I could do which owuldn't require additional mods to work (ECU, Valvetrain etc etc) which would it be? I'm thinking of having a set of long tube headers custom made. I want to spend about $2k or so on a mod by the end of the summer.
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (6)
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 3,682
Likes: 0
From: King of Materbation
Originally Posted by ReavTek
Wow that seems like the same path I want to take. However I can't afford to go all in right now. If you could recommend one mod I could do which owuldn't require additional mods to work (ECU, Valvetrain etc etc) which would it be? I'm thinking of having a set of long tube headers custom made. I want to spend about $2k or so on a mod by the end of the summer.
Originally Posted by Z350Lover
I am using Nismo S1 cams + nismo VTC units + nismo valve springs + motec + headers + cats + nismo exhaust + pulley and no problem with the street driving problem at all.... pulling out 217rwKW = 295rwHP on the loaded dyno dynamic dyno machine... so I guess 300rwHP is not that far anymore after I finish my intake mod (doing it now)...
cheers,
richie
cheers,
richie
Originally Posted by Zexy
Anybody else think this # is sort of low?? A memeber on this thread from Puerto Rico(forgot his name) reached the 300+ mark with less aggressive camshafts and no standalone.
and I think we cannot compare the dyno number actually... because those tests were done on different dyno machines with different dyno run conditions... just like mine was done on the load dyno instead of the inertia type dyno and as I know... the inertia type dyno's output is around 10% more than the load dyno output (I might be wrong)..
BTW... what is LS1 really? I don't really get it though....
cheers,
richie
BTW... what is LS1 really? I don't really get it though....
cheers,
richie
Originally Posted by Z350Lover
and I think we cannot compare the dyno number actually... because those tests were done on different dyno machines with different dyno run conditions... just like mine was done on the load dyno instead of the inertia type dyno and as I know... the inertia type dyno's output is around 10% more than the load dyno output (I might be wrong)..
BTW... what is LS1 really? I don't really get it though....
cheers,
richie
BTW... what is LS1 really? I don't really get it though....
cheers,
richie
Alright..... Air intake myth BUSTED officially.... done my intake... and no effect what so ever.... the power stays the same.... and now what.... hahahahha.....
This is what we have done to the intake:
1. 84mm bore diameter intake pipe per Nismo (integrated MAF sensor)
2. Larger bell mouth in the standard intake (go down to 84mm at the end)
3. Modify air box
4. Dyno tune..
Same power... (lost 1 rwKW... at the top and a few at the middle range).. since different dyno outputs on different days cannot really be compared... but those are considered as the same power (only 1rwKW diff at the top end, might due to the colder weather)... no gain or loss...
Pics are here... enjoy them!
cheers,
richie
This is what we have done to the intake:
1. 84mm bore diameter intake pipe per Nismo (integrated MAF sensor)
2. Larger bell mouth in the standard intake (go down to 84mm at the end)
3. Modify air box
4. Dyno tune..
Same power... (lost 1 rwKW... at the top and a few at the middle range).. since different dyno outputs on different days cannot really be compared... but those are considered as the same power (only 1rwKW diff at the top end, might due to the colder weather)... no gain or loss...
Pics are here... enjoy them!
cheers,
richie
Last edited by Z350Lover; Jul 13, 2005 at 05:28 AM.
Originally Posted by Z350Lover
Alright..... Air intake myth BUSTED officially.... done my intake... and no effect what so ever.... the power stays the same.... and now what.... hahahahha.....
This is what we have done to the intake:
1. 84mm bore diameter intake pipe per Nismo (integrated MAF sensor)
2. Larger bell mouth in the standard intake (go down to 84mm at the end)
3. Modify air box
4. Dyno tune..
Same power... (lost 1 rwKW... at the top and a few at the middle range).. since different dyno outputs on different days cannot really be compared... but those are considered as the same power (only 1rwKW diff at the top end, might due to the colder weather)... no gain or loss...
Pics are here... enjoy them!
cheers,
richie
This is what we have done to the intake:
1. 84mm bore diameter intake pipe per Nismo (integrated MAF sensor)
2. Larger bell mouth in the standard intake (go down to 84mm at the end)
3. Modify air box
4. Dyno tune..
Same power... (lost 1 rwKW... at the top and a few at the middle range).. since different dyno outputs on different days cannot really be compared... but those are considered as the same power (only 1rwKW diff at the top end, might due to the colder weather)... no gain or loss...
Pics are here... enjoy them!
cheers,
richie


