Notices
Engine & Drivetrain VQ Power and Delivery

How to go over 300whp without FI?, how can it be done?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-31-2005 | 02:20 AM
  #21  
ZON's Avatar
ZON
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 2,059
Likes: 0
From: norcal
Default

Originally Posted by Vash350Z
All the bolt-ons and tuning for 93 octane should get you pretty darn close.
Right, I'd like to see what it'll do with some 93 octuned from another state as apposed to the California Crud I have to run.
Old 10-31-2005 | 07:41 AM
  #22  
thawk408's Avatar
thawk408
Registered User
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 2,939
Likes: 0
From: Nashville, TN
Default

Your not going to break 300 with the stock block, unless you have higher compression.
Old 10-31-2005 | 07:50 AM
  #23  
002-M-P's Avatar
002-M-P
Registered User
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 2,311
Likes: 0
From: Raleigh, NC
Default

Originally Posted by thawk408
Your not going to break 300 with the stock block, unless you have higher compression.
wow, man of little faith
Old 10-31-2005 | 07:55 AM
  #24  
barthelb's Avatar
barthelb
Master
Premier Member
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 2,517
Likes: 0
From: California
Default

I think you need to check your answer.

You put your dyno at 273whp.
You don't have the following and i'll be conservative
Tuning 10-15whp
Cams 15-20
Flywheel 2-5 due to lightening of rotational mass.

Originally Posted by thawk408
Your not going to break 300 with the stock block, unless you have higher compression.
Old 10-31-2005 | 08:15 AM
  #25  
ZON's Avatar
ZON
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 2,059
Likes: 0
From: norcal
Default

I have reason to believe that if I put my car on the same dynojet I had it on a few years ago it would break 300. But the load dyno it was tuned on is supposed to be dead on. I have been wanting to do that anyway just for chit's & grin's.
Old 10-31-2005 | 08:48 AM
  #26  
thawk408's Avatar
thawk408
Registered User
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 2,939
Likes: 0
From: Nashville, TN
Default

Originally Posted by barthelb
I think you need to check your answer.

You put your dyno at 273whp.
You don't have the following and i'll be conservative
Tuning 10-15whp
Cams 15-20
Flywheel 2-5 due to lightening of rotational mass.
Yeah, that might get me over 300. I was mainly talking about the 287hp engine because that is what I figured he was refering to. 300rwhp might be possible without higher CR, but it is unlikely. I wish that these motors could get over 300 easy and respond really well to boltons, but it doesnt seem that way.

Also, how much power do you think some 110 octane would add?

Last edited by thawk408; 10-31-2005 at 08:51 AM.
Old 10-31-2005 | 09:17 AM
  #27  
barthelb's Avatar
barthelb
Master
Premier Member
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 2,517
Likes: 0
From: California
Default

Prob not much na unless your tuned or something. I wish it was like v8 motors bolt on this and that, hey 50rwhp not bad.

The new mustang, for 1000 bucks you can get 81rwhp. All they did was
Air intake 10 or 15whp
Muffler on the stock exhaust was 10 or 15whp
And a 50 shot of Nos.

Originally Posted by thawk408
Yeah, that might get me over 300. I was mainly talking about the 287hp engine because that is what I figured he was refering to. 300rwhp might be possible without higher CR, but it is unlikely. I wish that these motors could get over 300 easy and respond really well to boltons, but it doesnt seem that way.

Also, how much power do you think some 110 octane would add?
Old 10-31-2005 | 10:04 AM
  #28  
EM-EFER's Avatar
EM-EFER
Registered User
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 3,682
Likes: 0
From: King of Materbation
Default

Originally Posted by thawk408
Yeah, that might get me over 300. I was mainly talking about the 287hp engine because that is what I figured he was refering to. 300rwhp might be possible without higher CR, but it is unlikely. I wish that these motors could get over 300 easy and respond really well to boltons, but it doesnt seem that way.

Also, how much power do you think some 110 octane would add?

The only way to take advantage of 110 octane would be advancing the timing. Otherwise it won't do very much.
Old 10-31-2005 | 10:21 AM
  #29  
Armitage's Avatar
Armitage
350Z-holic
Premier Member
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 5,163
Likes: 3
From: North Jersey
Default

Originally Posted by thawk408
Yeah, that might get me over 300. I was mainly talking about the 287hp engine because that is what I figured he was refering to. 300rwhp might be possible without higher CR, but it is unlikely. I wish that these motors could get over 300 easy and respond really well to boltons, but it doesnt seem that way.

Also, how much power do you think some 110 octane would add?
I'm suprised you think 300 whp wouldn't be easy, seeing as you hit 255whp stock with your dyno.

And 110 octane won't do anything unless your tuned to take advantage of it.

Originally Posted by barthelb
Prob not much na unless your tuned or something. I wish it was like v8 motors bolt on this and that, hey 50rwhp not bad.

The new mustang, for 1000 bucks you can get 81rwhp. All they did was
Air intake 10 or 15whp
Muffler on the stock exhaust was 10 or 15whp
And a 50 shot of Nos.
JWT = 5whp $109
Y-pipe = 6-8whp ~$400
50 Shot NOS = 50whp

Thats roughly 60-65rwhp for around $1000. Its not too far off.
Old 10-31-2005 | 12:15 PM
  #30  
Forbidden Donut's Avatar
Forbidden Donut
Banned
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 199
Likes: 0
From: earth
Default

nitrous shouldn't really count though, unless u have an infinite supply of nitrous and are permanantly using it like gas.
Old 10-31-2005 | 01:51 PM
  #31  
Nismo 350z's Avatar
Nismo 350z
New Member
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 2,239
Likes: 1
From: So.Cali 626-951
Default

Is reflashing the ECU from Technosquare considered tuning? Sorry I am new to modding and tuning. I am actually gonna dyno my car this friday.
Old 10-31-2005 | 02:02 PM
  #32  
thawk408's Avatar
thawk408
Registered User
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 2,939
Likes: 0
From: Nashville, TN
Default

Originally Posted by Armitage
I'm suprised you think 300 whp wouldn't be easy, seeing as you hit 255whp stock with your dyno.

And 110 octane won't do anything unless your tuned to take advantage of it.



JWT = 5whp $109
Y-pipe = 6-8whp ~$400
50 Shot NOS = 50whp

Thats roughly 60-65rwhp for around $1000. Its not too far off.
I have the REV-UP motor and no one is really sure what they will do with cams and tuning, so I did not want to jump to conclusions.
Old 10-31-2005 | 03:44 PM
  #33  
SJTrackZ's Avatar
SJTrackZ
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 135
Likes: 0
From: San Jose
Default

Originally Posted by throbbing_Zon
I have reason to believe that if I put my car on the same dynojet I had it on a few years ago it would break 300. But the load dyno it was tuned on is supposed to be dead on. I have been wanting to do that anyway just for chit's & grin's.
I believe you would too. I dyno'd my car next door to SP before headers and had 244hp. Ted baselined at 238 w/ the headers. Just the difference in dyno's i guess.
Old 10-31-2005 | 04:14 PM
  #34  
Vash350Z's Avatar
Vash350Z
Registered User
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,918
Likes: 0
From: Davie/Lutz, Florida
Default

Originally Posted by throbbing_Zon
Right, I'd like to see what it'll do with some 93 octuned from another state as apposed to the California Crud I have to run.
Ive been considering attempting this myself instead of a vortech kit since i have access to 93 octane. Heck ive got pretty much every n/a mod already, all id really need is cams, flywheel/clutch/ crank pulley and a tune.
Old 10-31-2005 | 04:36 PM
  #35  
ZON's Avatar
ZON
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 2,059
Likes: 0
From: norcal
Default

Originally Posted by SJTrackZ
I believe you would too. I dyno'd my car next door to SP before headers and had 244hp. Ted baselined at 238 w/ the headers. Just the difference in dyno's i guess.
Awe yes that's the dynojet I'm talking about. The APEX Mustang shop dynojet.
I was 239 on that with the exhaust and intake and 229 with just JWT. On Ted's dyno the average for stock Z's, pre rev up, is 219. I wish he would have pre dyno'd mine because it already had the Borla duel and JWT. But those two dyno's aren't even in the same league.

I'm taking off the Kinetix plenum. It looks good and adds good gains but I can't live with the noise it makes. I really can't. I'm going to try the APS Tall Boy instead. Drat, I'll have to spend more and get a strut tower brace.
Old 10-31-2005 | 04:44 PM
  #36  
ZON's Avatar
ZON
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 2,059
Likes: 0
From: norcal
Default

Originally Posted by Vash350Z
Ive been considering attempting this myself instead of a vortech kit since i have access to 93 octane. Heck ive got pretty much every n/a mod already, all id really need is cams, flywheel/clutch/ crank pulley and a tune.

Right well I don't think it would be that much more. Just a couple extra hp that us N/A guys pay dearly for.
Old 10-31-2005 | 04:48 PM
  #37  
287HP's Avatar
287HP
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 261
Likes: 0
From: Bay Area
Default

Zon,

You and I are close on mods. What are the lift and duration of your sp cams?
Old 10-31-2005 | 06:32 PM
  #38  
JERZ33's Avatar
JERZ33
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 114
Likes: 0
From: Erial, NJ
Default

Im going all out on NA, Id like to set a bench mark for the Z N/A crowd. I will be starting, quite litteraly, from the top with a set of NISMO heads.
  • Competition Heads
  • Spec 2 Camshafts
  • Lightweight Valvestem Set
  • Valvespring Set

Then the block
  • Espirte (sp?) High Compression Pistons
  • Pauter Connecting Rods
  • APR nuts n bolts...

Then the BPU goodies:
  • Intake
  • Headers
  • Exhuast
  • Test Pipe
  • Clutch & Flywheel
  • UR Pulley Set

Then eManage Ultimate and some serious dollars spent on tuning in between...
Old 10-31-2005 | 10:00 PM
  #39  
thawk408's Avatar
thawk408
Registered User
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 2,939
Likes: 0
From: Nashville, TN
Default

I am really interested in the AEBS stroker. I have heard some bad things about having the increase stroke with the crankshaft, but dont know if it would really matter all that much. Then others say to just not buy the crank and you can have a 4.0. Either way a 4.0 or 4.3 would really help with power.
Old 11-01-2005 | 04:55 AM
  #40  
ZON's Avatar
ZON
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 2,059
Likes: 0
From: norcal
Default

Originally Posted by 287HP
Zon,

You and I are close on mods. What are the lift and duration of your sp cams?

287, this is going to sound like a cop out, and I will get flamed for this.
I am not at liberty to say right now. The Z is the SP N/A test bucket. Maybe when i get back from Malaysia pretty soon I can, I'll ask Ted. My Z has been there at SP for more tuning and testing since right before I came here early last month. We had a problem with the ECU and Unichip having a conflict. The ECU won. Ted told me a few weeks ago that that issue has been resolved and he actually got more whp out of it with the re-tune. But maybe you can call SP and Ted would just tell you, I don't know, I just don't have a green light yet. I can say that the idea behind these cams is to not sacrifice any torque anywhere. SP thinks sacrificing low end torque for high end hp is a big no no. So what we have is good gains in torque and hp everywhere. The cams are not loapy and I get a smooth stock like idle.

287 I was just thinking i would like to meet you after I get back. I live in Livermore but work in S.J. I haven't known anybody around the Bay Area with N/A mods like ours except for me. I would really like to meet you and see your Z too. Nice mods you have!!!


Quick Reply: How to go over 300whp without FI?, how can it be done?



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:02 PM.