Notices
Engine & Drivetrain VQ Power and Delivery

LSD and fuel consumption ??

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 29, 2005 | 11:27 PM
  #1  
bleunetizen's Avatar
bleunetizen
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 333
Likes: 3
From: nz
Default LSD and fuel consumption ??

Has anyone noticed any difference in fuel consumption after installing aftermarket LSD?
Reply
Old Nov 30, 2005 | 09:17 PM
  #2  
bleunetizen's Avatar
bleunetizen
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 333
Likes: 3
From: nz
Default

anyone??
Reply
Old Nov 30, 2005 | 10:18 PM
  #3  
Jason@Performance's Avatar
Jason@Performance
Sponsor
Performance Nissan
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 8,783
Likes: 3
From: So-Cal - Ready to go?
Default

has absolutly nothing to do with Fuel Consumption...

Does not change the amount of RPMs the motor has to make to sping the wheels..

nor does it require any more power needed to spin the rear wheels...
Reply
Old Nov 30, 2005 | 11:34 PM
  #4  
bleunetizen's Avatar
bleunetizen
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 333
Likes: 3
From: nz
Default

yes, i know that but fuel consumption is not only rpm or throttle dependant.. the drive train efficiency takes a big part of it as well..

i was thinking, depending on how 'efficient' the clutch type lsd is probably has some effect on fuel consumption because it will create more drag to rear wheel at low speed turns and etc? open diff will just transfer the torque to whichever wheel that gets or loses traction, whereas clutch type lsds (including torsen) has much aggressive limit of slip which will 'drag' the torque that goes to one side to match with the other side. LSDs give better traction and all that because it can transfer the torque to the ground more efficiently, but that being efficient obviously means more 'load' to the engine through the drivetrain also.

i am thinking, since that extra 'drag' or 'load' is always there with aggressive lsds (not necessarily slowing the car down but fully transferring the power to the ground), it probably has some effect to fuel consumption?

any actual words from the users will definately clear this out.. anyone?

Last edited by bleunetizen; Nov 30, 2005 at 11:37 PM.
Reply
Old Dec 2, 2005 | 06:07 AM
  #5  
one3502nv's Avatar
one3502nv
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 377
Likes: 0
From: NJ
Default

I have had the Nismo LSD for over 60,000 miles and have never seen a difference in mpg... I also have over 400 whp and still average 16-20 mpg....
Reply
Old Dec 2, 2005 | 11:16 AM
  #6  
mavtais's Avatar
mavtais
Registered User
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,074
Likes: 0
From: CentralCal - Fresno
Default

No difference. When you let off the throttle while rolling in gear, you use 0 amount of gas.
Reply
Old Dec 2, 2005 | 12:43 PM
  #7  
Jason@Performance's Avatar
Jason@Performance
Sponsor
Performance Nissan
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 8,783
Likes: 3
From: So-Cal - Ready to go?
Default

it does no effect the amount of force needed to turn the rear wheels...

it just distributes the power to both equally going straight or turning...

if a gear ratio was changed then there will be a differance...
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
MM'08_350Z
VQ35HR
225
Apr 22, 2021 09:42 PM
Colombo
Forced Induction
35
Nov 9, 2020 10:27 AM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:32 PM.