Notices
Engine & Drivetrain VQ Power and Delivery

Headers vs Crank pulley

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 27, 2005 | 01:53 PM
  #1  
NiSmO21z's Avatar
NiSmO21z
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 171
Likes: 0
From: Delaware
Question Headers vs Crank pulley

If had an options, which one would you get and why?
Reply
Old Dec 27, 2005 | 02:06 PM
  #2  
Vamos_Rafael's Avatar
Vamos_Rafael
Registered User
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,072
Likes: 0
From: Villanova University
Default

i'd do headers
cuz its the biggest job ever
lol
Reply
Old Dec 27, 2005 | 02:10 PM
  #3  
RNL323's Avatar
RNL323
Mod My Ride
Premier Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 500
Likes: 0
From: THE BAY AREA
Default

headers... more power you can feel.
Reply
Old Dec 27, 2005 | 02:19 PM
  #4  
davidv's Avatar
davidv
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 42,753
Likes: 11
From: Tucson, AZ
Default


...because they look pretty.
Reply
Old Dec 27, 2005 | 03:09 PM
  #5  
Vamos_Rafael's Avatar
Vamos_Rafael
Registered User
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,072
Likes: 0
From: Villanova University
Default

Originally Posted by davidv

...because they look pretty.
nice pictures
Reply
Old Dec 27, 2005 | 04:15 PM
  #6  
Zivman's Avatar
Zivman
New Member
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 7,179
Likes: 27
From: MPLS/ST.Paul MN
Default

crank pulley 100%
You will feel the increase in power in every gear and throughout the entire RPM range. It is cheaper, and MUCH easier to install.

headers barely made any difference in power or sound. a little mid to upper RPM gains, but nothing worth the trouble/$ of install.

Edit:
Also, when you realize N/A isn't all that it's cracked up to be, you won't have to take the crank pulley off when you install your turbo kit.
Reply
Old Dec 28, 2005 | 05:55 AM
  #7  
Kolia's Avatar
Kolia
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 2,821
Likes: 3
From: Columbus, Ohio
Default

Headers all the way !

Pulleys have a bad reputation of sometimes have nasty vibration issues on some engines.
Reply
Old Dec 28, 2005 | 06:00 AM
  #8  
Alberto's Avatar
Alberto
Cranky FI Owner
Premier Member
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 34,715
Likes: 8
From: DMV
Default

Crank pulley-its an easy 45 minute install. Save yourself hundreds. I have yet to see an independant dyno prove that headers add power to bolt-on Z's with STOCK cams. I believe stock headers flow very well, and many other people in the past have PM'd me saying "your right I gained nothing to very little on the dyno with my headers" Take it for what its worth
Reply
Old Dec 28, 2005 | 06:41 AM
  #9  
Zivman's Avatar
Zivman
New Member
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 7,179
Likes: 27
From: MPLS/ST.Paul MN
Default

Originally Posted by Kolia
Headers all the way !

Pulleys have a bad reputation of sometimes have nasty vibration issues on some engines.
Please do a bit more research before you make statements like that. Tons of people run crank pulleys on Zs without issue.

FYI, the stock pulley does not have a harmonic dampner on it.
Reply
Old Dec 28, 2005 | 06:58 AM
  #10  
Alberto's Avatar
Alberto
Cranky FI Owner
Premier Member
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 34,715
Likes: 8
From: DMV
Exclamation

Originally Posted by Zivman
Please do a bit more research before you make statements like that. Tons of people run crank pulleys on Zs without issue.

FYI, the stock pulley does not have a harmonic dampner on it.
+1 I have had the UR CP for over 30K miles with the 7100rpm limit with no issues at all...
Reply
Old Dec 28, 2005 | 08:01 AM
  #11  
Kolia's Avatar
Kolia
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 2,821
Likes: 3
From: Columbus, Ohio
Default

Good for you guys.

But it will take more than "I've hade it for XX miles with no problems" to satisfy someone who actually works in automotive design and has read real papers on the subject.

I don't want to highjack this thread, the subject has been discussed often enough. The OP asked our opinion, I gave mine.
Reply
Old Dec 28, 2005 | 08:08 AM
  #12  
Zivman's Avatar
Zivman
New Member
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 7,179
Likes: 27
From: MPLS/ST.Paul MN
Default

Originally Posted by Kolia
Good for you guys.

But it will take more than "I've hade it for XX miles with no problems" to satisfy someone who actually works in automotive design and has read real papers on the subject.

I don't want to highjack this thread, the subject has been discussed often enough. The OP asked our opinion, I gave mine.
Your arguement holds no water. If anything, reducing the rotating mass with the pulley takes stress off the motor. As long as the pulley is balanced, there is no issue. I know people that have built motors reported that the UR was very well balanced.

And again, the stock pulley does not have a harmonic dampner on it, so it is bascially just a heavy UR pulley. Besides, the VQ is internally balanced. If the crank pulley was such a potential issue, you could say the exact same thing about a lightened flywheel. It is basically the same thing as a crank pulley, just spinning off the other end of the motor.

Get you facts straight.

All that said, if you have fear of a crank pulley, I would do nether. headers just aren't worth the trouble of install.
Reply
Old Dec 28, 2005 | 08:45 AM
  #13  
Kolia's Avatar
Kolia
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 2,821
Likes: 3
From: Columbus, Ohio
Default

What argument did I state? I didn't say anything!
Who said anything about lightned flywheels ? (these are actually less "bad" than UR pulleys)
And since when a rotating mass at the end of a shaft doesn't affect harmonic resonnance? Did physics change over the holydays?

A crank shaft twists back and forth all the time in an internal combustion engine. These oscilliations will resonnate along the shaft and combine with other oscilliation from the combustion in the other cylinders. Changing the natural frequency of the crank shaft assembly (with a lighter pulley or flywheel) will have different effect on the resonnances. Exactly what happens then, we don't know. Do aftermarket manufacturer test these engines with their own lightenent pulley? I don't think so. Did the engine manufacturer test it's engine's frenquencies? You bet they did!

The engine will certainly run a long time with no problem with a lighter pulley. Hopefully beyond the car's service life. If it does, great.

IMO, I think it's not the best way to improve an engine's perfomance.

The OP already has a header-back exhaust installed on his car. The headers would be most beneficial in his case.
Reply
Old Dec 28, 2005 | 09:22 AM
  #14  
D350Z10's Avatar
D350Z10
New Member
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,218
Likes: 2
From: Michigan
Default

HEADERS... WAY MORE POWER and sounds alot better!
Reply
Old Dec 28, 2005 | 09:57 AM
  #15  
MoodDude's Avatar
MoodDude
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,286
Likes: 0
From: Albany, GA
Default

Not sure about either headers or pulley.

All I know is that most pulley's that gain hp, actually are benifiting from not running the components they are driving the same RPM. Thus, less power is used to say run the alternator, not sure this is really a good thing to do? I know for sure if you have a turbo you can't do it.
They do make stock diameter pulley's that are lighter, yet I think you would gain more by getting a new flywheel that is lightwieght.
Reply
Old Dec 28, 2005 | 10:01 AM
  #16  
Zivman's Avatar
Zivman
New Member
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 7,179
Likes: 27
From: MPLS/ST.Paul MN
Default

Originally Posted by Kolia
What argument did I state? I didn't say anything!
Who said anything about lightned flywheels ? (these are actually less "bad" than UR pulleys)
And since when a rotating mass at the end of a shaft doesn't affect harmonic resonnance? Did physics change over the holydays?

A crank shaft twists back and forth all the time in an internal combustion engine. These oscilliations will resonnate along the shaft and combine with other oscilliation from the combustion in the other cylinders. Changing the natural frequency of the crank shaft assembly (with a lighter pulley or flywheel) will have different effect on the resonnances. Exactly what happens then, we don't know. Do aftermarket manufacturer test these engines with their own lightenent pulley? I don't think so. Did the engine manufacturer test it's engine's frenquencies? You bet they did!

The engine will certainly run a long time with no problem with a lighter pulley. Hopefully beyond the car's service life. If it does, great.

IMO, I think it's not the best way to improve an engine's perfomance.

The OP already has a header-back exhaust installed on his car. The headers would be most beneficial in his case.
Your statement above is all speculation. The VQ is an internally balanced engine. Changing the crank pulley is essentially the same as changing a flywheel. If what you are saying about 'engine frequencies" was true, the VQ would be equiped with a harmonic dampner which it is not. Also, if what you are saying is true, any aftermarket part could potentially cauase the same issue as parts like plenums, headers, exhaust, etc and especially for people with built motors and cams definitely change the power delivery and frequencies at given RPMs.

In terms of gains. I ran them on my car with intake, test pipes, plenum and exhaust. headers made very minimal gains that couldn't be felt. In addition, they had litterely no impact on the exhaust note.
Reply
Old Dec 28, 2005 | 10:32 AM
  #17  
Kolia's Avatar
Kolia
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 2,821
Likes: 3
From: Columbus, Ohio
Default

Originally Posted by Zivman
Your statement above is all speculation. The VQ is an internally balanced engine. Changing the crank pulley is essentially the same as changing a flywheel. If what you are saying about 'engine frequencies" was true, the VQ would be equiped with a harmonic dampner which it is not. Also, if what you are saying is true, any aftermarket part could potentially cauase the same issue as parts like plenums, headers, exhaust, etc and especially for people with built motors and cams definitely change the power delivery and frequencies at given RPMs.

In terms of gains. I ran them on my car with intake, test pipes, plenum and exhaust. headers made very minimal gains that couldn't be felt. In addition, they had litterely no impact on the exhaust note.
You're basically saying that building a VQ35 to output 350-400hp has no effect on reliability?

Any modifications to the performance of the engine will affect how long it will last. We're just eating up some of the security factor the engineers used to design the engine.

If the VQ35 doesn't have a funky crank pulley to act as a harmonic damper, it's because it doesn't need it under normal operation condition. So, yes you're right in that sense. It does not mean it doesn't need that 10-15 lb (I don't know how much the OEM pulley weights) pulley to function properly.

Anyways, I didn't want to engage in a lenghty discussion on the subject. I'm not a resonnance specialist, just a curious designer. I did my research and from my findings, UR pulley are not the best way to go. Improving the engines efficiency (intake, exhaust) and programing is more effective and reliable.

It's still only my opinion of course. Nobody has to share it. In fact, my Z doesn't have any engine mods and I don't plan to do any. I spend my money on track time.
Reply
Old Dec 28, 2005 | 10:43 AM
  #18  
cvt's Avatar
cvt
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,128
Likes: 0
From: los angeles area
Default

the altima guys have been running aftermarket crank pullies with no problems for years with the VQ...there are Zs with 65,000 miles with aftermarket pullies with no signs of wear or problems.
Reply
Old Dec 28, 2005 | 03:10 PM
  #19  
Miraclekidjr's Avatar
Miraclekidjr
Banned
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 591
Likes: 0
From: Gainesville/Tampa
Default

Yea, I also want to find out what will give more gains...I just bought test pipes and exhaust so wouldn't it be easier to get headers and install it all at the same time?
Reply
Old Dec 28, 2005 | 03:49 PM
  #20  
Diesel350's Avatar
Diesel350
Registered User
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 8,378
Likes: 1
From: Tampa
Default

Originally Posted by Alberto
Crank pulley-its an easy 45 minute install. Save yourself hundreds. I have yet to see an independant dyno prove that headers add power to bolt-on Z's with STOCK cams. I believe stock headers flow very well, and many other people in the past have PM'd me saying "your right I gained nothing to very little on the dyno with my headers" Take it for what its worth
I have yet to see any independent dyno that shows the crank pulley has any gains

The only dyno's I have seen are with no gain or loss of power.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:56 AM.