Dyno pre and post Utec
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 616
Likes: 0
From: Annapolis Maryland
Im getting my car pre-dynoed today at extreme motorsports in odenton and then monday i am getting Utec installed and i will re-dyno my car after it has been tuned early next week.
My modifications so far are as follows: Helix test pipes, AAM plenum spacer, JWT pop charger, clutch, flywheel, pressure plate, AAM y-pipe, AAM reflash with retarded timing, UR crank pulley.
My guesstimate of pre Utec hp is 260 whereas i dynoed 257 minus the crank pulley and with advanced timing. any guestimates on pre and post hp?
My modifications so far are as follows: Helix test pipes, AAM plenum spacer, JWT pop charger, clutch, flywheel, pressure plate, AAM y-pipe, AAM reflash with retarded timing, UR crank pulley.
My guesstimate of pre Utec hp is 260 whereas i dynoed 257 minus the crank pulley and with advanced timing. any guestimates on pre and post hp?
I call 265 before, 285 after....I think your A/F may be all screwed up from all the breathing mods which only leaves more potential for gains from UTEC......
Good luck man!
Edit: I just read you have an AAM flash, I scale back my post gain to 275... you already have some tuning there.
Good luck man!
Edit: I just read you have an AAM flash, I scale back my post gain to 275... you already have some tuning there.
I am with this dude! Post results!
Originally Posted by DomZ
I call 265 before, 285 after....I think your A/F may be all screwed up from all the breathing mods which only leaves more potential for gains from UTEC......
Good luck man!
Edit: I just read you have an AAM flash, I scale back my post gain to 275... you already have some tuning there.
Good luck man!
Edit: I just read you have an AAM flash, I scale back my post gain to 275... you already have some tuning there.
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 616
Likes: 0
From: Annapolis Maryland
i made 244 hp and 232 ft/lbs.... well looks like retarding timing gave me 13 less hp... lets hope a Utec can salvage these numbers
edit: ok theres gotta be something wrong with my car then, no way im making 13 less hp after adding an UR crank pulley and retarding the timing...
edit: ok theres gotta be something wrong with my car then, no way im making 13 less hp after adding an UR crank pulley and retarding the timing...
Last edited by raptorbh12; Jan 27, 2006 at 11:55 AM.
Trending Topics
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 616
Likes: 0
From: Annapolis Maryland
i know that, but im saying i shouldnt have lost 13 hp by retarding the timing, and then theres the UR crank pulley i added since i last dynoed. so its more like i lost 20hp from retarding the timing, or something else unforseen is wrong.
Depending on the amount of timing you have taken out, these results may not be suprising at all. I actually would have guessed around or a little less than stock. With a Utec and a proper tune you should be able to hit 265-268 is my guess. You are lacking headers, which would give you a big improvement.
I picked up 14whp after UTEC tuning. I had the AAM reflash prior to adding UTEC.
Here's the list of mods during UTEC tuning:
AAM polished plenum
AAM plenum spacer
AAM y-pipe
AAM 2.5" test pipes (currently off)
AAM 3" single stainless angled exhaust
AAM ECU flash
UTEC with Tuner Reg Pro
Injen RD CAI
ACT clutch w/ 6 puck Race Disc
Fidanza flywheel
Here's part of my post from 350z - tech:
OK. The results are in. The baseline dyno run was 253whp / max torque 239. UTEC installed and tuned with 93 octane - 264whp / max torque 248. UTEC installed and tuned with 100 octane - 267whp / max torque 251.
I thought that I would get more out of adding UTEC to my NA setup. I'm not unhappy, the setup might just require more tuning and adding UTEC was a part of my plan to go FI next year anyway.
I feel that the stock cats might be too restrictive. If I had my test pipes on, I might have put 270whp down using 93 octane.
I was suprised that the gains were minimal when using 100 versus 93 octane. I believe that the timing was advanced 2-3 degrees on 100 octane. I'll check to be sure. Also, I'm not sure that the car was empty after the 93 octane tuning. This could have resulted in 95-96 octane fuel after the 100 octane was added.
_______
It's my opinion that we will only get 15-20whp out of UTEC while NA. UTEC comes to life when added to an FI application.
Considering that I will be going FI later this year, adding UTEC was a worthwhile purchase.
My 2 cents.
Here's the list of mods during UTEC tuning:
AAM polished plenum
AAM plenum spacer
AAM y-pipe
AAM 2.5" test pipes (currently off)
AAM 3" single stainless angled exhaust
AAM ECU flash
UTEC with Tuner Reg Pro
Injen RD CAI
ACT clutch w/ 6 puck Race Disc
Fidanza flywheel
Here's part of my post from 350z - tech:
OK. The results are in. The baseline dyno run was 253whp / max torque 239. UTEC installed and tuned with 93 octane - 264whp / max torque 248. UTEC installed and tuned with 100 octane - 267whp / max torque 251.
I thought that I would get more out of adding UTEC to my NA setup. I'm not unhappy, the setup might just require more tuning and adding UTEC was a part of my plan to go FI next year anyway.
I feel that the stock cats might be too restrictive. If I had my test pipes on, I might have put 270whp down using 93 octane.
I was suprised that the gains were minimal when using 100 versus 93 octane. I believe that the timing was advanced 2-3 degrees on 100 octane. I'll check to be sure. Also, I'm not sure that the car was empty after the 93 octane tuning. This could have resulted in 95-96 octane fuel after the 100 octane was added.
_______
It's my opinion that we will only get 15-20whp out of UTEC while NA. UTEC comes to life when added to an FI application.
Considering that I will be going FI later this year, adding UTEC was a worthwhile purchase.
My 2 cents.
Originally Posted by BobbyRitz
I picked up 14whp after UTEC tuning. I had the AAM reflash prior to adding UTEC.
Here's the list of mods during UTEC tuning:
AAM polished plenum
AAM plenum spacer
AAM y-pipe
AAM 2.5" test pipes (currently off)
AAM 3" single stainless angled exhaust
AAM ECU flash
UTEC with Tuner Reg Pro
Injen RD CAI
ACT clutch w/ 6 puck Race Disc
Fidanza flywheel
Here's part of my post from 350z - tech:
OK. The results are in. The baseline dyno run was 253whp / max torque 239. UTEC installed and tuned with 93 octane - 264whp / max torque 248. UTEC installed and tuned with 100 octane - 267whp / max torque 251.
I thought that I would get more out of adding UTEC to my NA setup. I'm not unhappy, the setup might just require more tuning and adding UTEC was a part of my plan to go FI next year anyway.
I feel that the stock cats might be too restrictive. If I had my test pipes on, I might have put 270whp down using 93 octane.
I was suprised that the gains were minimal when using 100 versus 93 octane. I believe that the timing was advanced 2-3 degrees on 100 octane. I'll check to be sure. Also, I'm not sure that the car was empty after the 93 octane tuning. This could have resulted in 95-96 octane fuel after the 100 octane was added.
_______
It's my opinion that we will only get 15-20whp out of UTEC while NA. UTEC comes to life when added to an FI application.
Considering that I will be going FI later this year, adding UTEC was a worthwhile purchase.
My 2 cents.
Here's the list of mods during UTEC tuning:
AAM polished plenum
AAM plenum spacer
AAM y-pipe
AAM 2.5" test pipes (currently off)
AAM 3" single stainless angled exhaust
AAM ECU flash
UTEC with Tuner Reg Pro
Injen RD CAI
ACT clutch w/ 6 puck Race Disc
Fidanza flywheel
Here's part of my post from 350z - tech:
OK. The results are in. The baseline dyno run was 253whp / max torque 239. UTEC installed and tuned with 93 octane - 264whp / max torque 248. UTEC installed and tuned with 100 octane - 267whp / max torque 251.
I thought that I would get more out of adding UTEC to my NA setup. I'm not unhappy, the setup might just require more tuning and adding UTEC was a part of my plan to go FI next year anyway.
I feel that the stock cats might be too restrictive. If I had my test pipes on, I might have put 270whp down using 93 octane.
I was suprised that the gains were minimal when using 100 versus 93 octane. I believe that the timing was advanced 2-3 degrees on 100 octane. I'll check to be sure. Also, I'm not sure that the car was empty after the 93 octane tuning. This could have resulted in 95-96 octane fuel after the 100 octane was added.
_______
It's my opinion that we will only get 15-20whp out of UTEC while NA. UTEC comes to life when added to an FI application.
Considering that I will be going FI later this year, adding UTEC was a worthwhile purchase.
My 2 cents.
Sounds about right. I looked at your mods and tried to guess how much wheel hp you would have after utec tuning without looking at your results. I actually guessed 263 whp on 93 octane while you made 264 whp. So i was close.
The UTEC also showed similar results on my G35 cpe
-from stock i picked up ~12whp
-after adding the LMS res. test pipes and a tune, i picked up another 12whp
It's definitely worthwhile w/NA and a MUST w/FI.
-from stock i picked up ~12whp
-after adding the LMS res. test pipes and a tune, i picked up another 12whp
It's definitely worthwhile w/NA and a MUST w/FI.



