Notices
Engine & Drivetrain VQ Power and Delivery

Has anyone really pulled 300rwhp yet on a N/A VQ?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-09-2006 | 04:07 PM
  #101  
Gruppe-S's Avatar
Gruppe-S
Vendor - Former Vendor
iTrader: (66)
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 2,465
Likes: 1
From: Santa Ana CA 92701
Default

Originally Posted by PoWeRtRiP
who even cares anymore. its only 300whp. its not like thats really that much. id rather see an n/a z that breaks 12.5 in the 1/4, than 300whp on a "dynojet".

can we use a more fair basis for our assumptions here?
Yup! You have to remember dynos can vary over 25whp from dyno to dyno. Generally speaking the dynapacks tend to read the highest. The true indication of horsepower is actually found in the 1/4 mile trap speed for any given car. Dyno horsepower is only relative to that particular dyno itself. This is why we have 400whp STI's (on our dyno) trapping the same trap speeds as 500whp STI's on other dynos.

Cheers,

Gary
Gruppe-S
Old 02-10-2006 | 11:39 AM
  #102  
Z_xtc's Avatar
Z_xtc
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 71
Likes: 0
From: Another Dimension
Default

Originally Posted by Gruppe-S
Yup! You have to remember dynos can vary over 25whp from dyno to dyno. Generally speaking the dynapacks tend to read the highest. The true indication of horsepower is actually found in the 1/4 mile trap speed for any given car. Dyno horsepower is only relative to that particular dyno itself. This is why we have 400whp STI's (on our dyno) trapping the same trap speeds as 500whp STI's on other dynos.

Cheers,

Gary
Gruppe-S
And why I've seen a lot of people posting in the 240's bone stock baseline (maybe it wasn't SAE corrected) yet with all my mod's I only pulled a 242 on this particular dyno (SAE corrected). The owner said that other Z's baselines were in the 220's (not 240's) that he'd done on that dyno, and that mine was the strongest n/a he'd done so far. So, talking about your difference in dyno's . . .

I haven't re-reflashed since installing the MD Iso-Thermal & Copper, which may get me more yet (it made enough difference to throw an IAT sensor reading right after install, so it's quite cleary doing it's job).

Interesting note: The 3.917's made no appreciable difference on the dyno, but on the street it gives me more than all the other mod's combined IMO. How else could I possibly hang side-by-side an '04 Zo6 from a dig up to 150 (convertible, & auto, but still . . .), TWICE, on a mere 242whp? Or run off and leave a (1st year) GTO, outrun an M3, hang w/ a 2000 'stang w/ 100-shot of Nos, outrun a man. WS6 (2 auto's too), Camaro SS, etc. etc. (Let the trolling & flaming begin . . . )

The answer lies in all the above discussion, no doubt.
Old 02-10-2006 | 11:56 AM
  #103  
Z_xtc's Avatar
Z_xtc
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 71
Likes: 0
From: Another Dimension
Default

PS- We SHOULD be taking about peak vs. steady curves as well, for what a motor does for just a second is obviously not as important as what it does from off-idle all the way to redline. It's like the new revup motors: less PEAK torque, but more torque overall. Numbers can be so deceiving.

My "peak" hp may only be 242, but notice how long it remains in effect:

https://my350z.com/forum/attachment....1&d=1139600952
Attached Thumbnails Has anyone really pulled 300rwhp yet on a N/A VQ?-z-dyno.jpg  
Old 02-10-2006 | 11:58 AM
  #104  
Z_xtc's Avatar
Z_xtc
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 71
Likes: 0
From: Another Dimension
Default

. . . er, "talking" about, that is . . .
Old 02-10-2006 | 12:25 PM
  #105  
jpc350z's Avatar
jpc350z
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,041
Likes: 0
From: columbia md.
Default

Originally Posted by Z_xtc
PS- We SHOULD be taking about peak vs. steady curves as well, for what a motor does for just a second is obviously not as important as what it does from off-idle all the way to redline. It's like the new revup motors: less PEAK torque, but more torque overall. Numbers can be so deceiving.

My "peak" hp may only be 242, but notice how long it remains in effect:

https://my350z.com/forum/attachment....1&d=1139600952
Do you have a pre 3.197 dyno and post dyno for comparison..The Tq curve is of interest..
Old 02-10-2006 | 12:25 PM
  #106  
thawk408's Avatar
thawk408
Registered User
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 2,939
Likes: 0
From: Nashville, TN
Default

Originally Posted by Z_xtc
And why I've seen a lot of people posting in the 240's bone stock baseline (maybe it wasn't SAE corrected) yet with all my mod's I only pulled a 242 on this particular dyno (SAE corrected). The owner said that other Z's baselines were in the 220's (not 240's) that he'd done on that dyno, and that mine was the strongest n/a he'd done so far. So, talking about your difference in dyno's . . .

I haven't re-reflashed since installing the MD Iso-Thermal & Copper, which may get me more yet (it made enough difference to throw an IAT sensor reading right after install, so it's quite cleary doing it's job).

Interesting note: The 3.917's made no appreciable difference on the dyno, but on the street it gives me more than all the other mod's combined IMO. How else could I possibly hang side-by-side an '04 Zo6 from a dig up to 150 (convertible, & auto, but still . . .), TWICE, on a mere 242whp? Or run off and leave a (1st year) GTO, outrun an M3, hang w/ a 2000 'stang w/ 100-shot of Nos, outrun a man. WS6 (2 auto's too), Camaro SS, etc. etc. (Let the trolling & flaming begin . . . )

The answer lies in all the above discussion, no doubt.
Sorry, but z06 only comes in hardtop 6spd and if you didnt know that then I question your credibilty on the other runs. Maybe you beat them, maybe you didnt.....I dont know.

Last edited by thawk408; 02-10-2006 at 12:29 PM.
Old 02-10-2006 | 01:04 PM
  #107  
97supratt's Avatar
97supratt
Registered User
iTrader: (61)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 5,034
Likes: 3
From: Glendale California
Default

Originally Posted by thawk408
Sorry, but z06 only comes in hardtop 6spd and if you didnt know that then I question your credibilty on the other runs. Maybe you beat them, maybe you didnt.....I dont know.
I was just about to say that. No Z06 is auto nor conv.
Old 02-10-2006 | 03:02 PM
  #108  
laswyguy's Avatar
laswyguy
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 346
Likes: 0
From: Los Angeles
Default

What should a 290 whp Z run a 1/4 mile with your good performance street tires (PS2) , assuming a good driver. The reason I ask is where hell are all the NA Z's in the 12s with decent trap speeds? You figure with all these claimed Z's in the 280 to 290 whp range, shouldnt they be easily running 12.9 to 13.1 trapping around 108-110? Add on a 3.97 final drive and you can shave another .3 to .4 off that and should be into mid to high 12s? Does this sound right or am I smoking crack?? I mean, how does a 997 c2s with 355whp run 12.6, and trap 113? It cant be all just traction can it? Why cant a Z with similar power run even close?.. Someone please tell me.
Old 02-10-2006 | 05:35 PM
  #109  
frostyrock7c's Avatar
frostyrock7c
Registered User
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 572
Likes: 0
From: Savannah, GA
Default Hhhmmm...

Originally Posted by Z_xtc
...Interesting note: The 3.917's made no appreciable difference on the dyno, but on the street it gives me more than all the other mod's combined IMO. ...
I'm on the fence about getting the gears myself, I track my car quite frequently and seldom drag, but for comparison purposes, what kind of 1/4 or 0-60's are you getting? I guess I'm asking, just how much better does it help the Z33 accelerate? Anyone ??

Thanks,
Mike
Old 02-10-2006 | 11:12 PM
  #110  
Armitage's Avatar
Armitage
350Z-holic
Premier Member
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 5,163
Likes: 3
From: North Jersey
Default

Originally Posted by konspec
here's something I've been curious of for awhile. Has anyone ventured into the possiblity of a ITB set up? I know that right now it's popular for most high reving inline motors but, nothing is impossible to fab. It might be really expensive to fab but, for the gains from ITBs it could be worth it instead of engine internal/stroking/boring. Just a thought, I could be crazy.
I read a thread, I think it was on this site, about an ITB setup. IIRC, it is very difficult and expensive to do because the Z is not drive by wire, rather its all electronic. As a result, the entire ECU system needs to be yanked and replaced with something that is compatible with an ITB setup.

In that same thread, I think they talked about Tommy Kaira doing a custom ITB setup on a Z... it cost around $30k and gained 13whp IIRC.
Old 02-11-2006 | 04:33 AM
  #111  
zzzya's Avatar
zzzya
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,158
Likes: 0
From: Iowa
Default

Originally Posted by frostyrock7c
I'm on the fence about getting the gears myself, I track my car quite frequently and seldom drag, but for comparison purposes, what kind of 1/4 or 0-60's are you getting? I guess I'm asking, just how much better does it help the Z33 accelerate? Anyone ??

Thanks,
Mike
The 3.9 gears were specifically created for people who track their car. A stock Z will see benefits on the drag strip with these but high HP cars (FI) are going to see better 1/4 mile times with the 3.5 or better yet the 3.3 5AT gears due to less shifting and higher gear top speeds. On the track you want to keep the rpms up and the 3.9 gears will help with that allowing for faster acceleration out of turns.
Old 02-11-2006 | 06:50 AM
  #112  
konspec's Avatar
konspec
Registered User
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 318
Likes: 0
From: pa
Default

Originally Posted by Armitage
I read a thread, I think it was on this site, about an ITB setup. IIRC, it is very difficult and expensive to do because the Z is not drive by wire, rather its all electronic. As a result, the entire ECU system needs to be yanked and replaced with something that is compatible with an ITB setup.

In that same thread, I think they talked about Tommy Kaira doing a custom ITB setup on a Z... it cost around $30k and gained 13whp IIRC.
ouch.....and I've seen b18s put 27whp with ITB.. I figured if it was imaginable and worthwhile someone with a Z would have it done but, there's my answer. 30k for 13whp! I'd rather race lawntractor through a gaunlet!
Old 02-11-2006 | 09:06 AM
  #113  
Machupo's Avatar
Machupo
Registered User
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,676
Likes: 0
From: Eltmann, Franconia
Default

i really don't understand why an ITB setup is so ridiculously expensive? it should make it easier that it is drive by wire... a couple bux at radio shack is all it would take to resolve any issues of fooling the ECU...
Old 02-11-2006 | 09:10 AM
  #114  
Z1 Performance's Avatar
Z1 Performance
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (564)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 19,266
Likes: 5
From: Long Island, New York
Default

AFAIK there is only 1 car that combines an ITB and DBW....and that's an M3. It is not nearly as easy as one would think
Old 02-11-2006 | 09:17 AM
  #115  
Machupo's Avatar
Machupo
Registered User
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,676
Likes: 0
From: Eltmann, Franconia
Default

Adam,

what specific information do you have to transmit to the computer? the only thing I can think of is throttle plate position (inbound) and control (outbound)?

it really depends on whether that is transmitted as a digital signal (op codes and whatnot) or as an analog voltage level... if it is the former, it could get very very tricky, but if it is the later, it's simplicity in an of itself to slave a second throttle plate off the first.

As for controlling the throttle plate (outbound information), again, if it's analog voltage it'd be a couple bux to get a 2nd throttle plate responding to the 1st plate's signal... problem is that you'd need to build a central encoding/decoding module if the signals were opcodes (and this would require the complete list of possible position codes/etc...)
Old 02-11-2006 | 09:41 AM
  #116  
Blownaway's Avatar
Blownaway
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 327
Likes: 0
From: Lindenhurst
Default

Mjedens and myself, as far as I know were the closest. Now I havent dynoed since adding the upper and lower manifolds, but I have been alot more reliable than any Forced inducted motors in the Chicago area. I will have a new dyno and tune within the next 5 weeks. I will post up then.
Old 02-11-2006 | 12:05 PM
  #117  
DayBlueZ's Avatar
DayBlueZ
Registered User
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,949
Likes: 0
From: B'ham Al
Default

Originally Posted by Z_xtc
And why I've seen a lot of people posting in the 240's bone stock baseline (maybe it wasn't SAE corrected) yet with all my mod's I only pulled a 242 on this particular dyno (SAE corrected). The owner said that other Z's baselines were in the 220's (not 240's) that he'd done on that dyno, and that mine was the strongest n/a he'd done so far. So, talking about your difference in dyno's . . .
You are 2 HP ahead of me on that Dyno. I have 240 on the same machine. I haven't had a flash but, i do have the UTEC in my posession and am hoping for good results.
Old 02-11-2006 | 12:36 PM
  #118  
Blownaway's Avatar
Blownaway
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 327
Likes: 0
From: Lindenhurst
Default

I am assuming you can use UTEC on top of a ecu that has been flashed for fine tuning? What is the best overall price you have found for the whole utec setup
Old 02-11-2006 | 04:06 PM
  #119  
DayBlueZ's Avatar
DayBlueZ
Registered User
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,949
Likes: 0
From: B'ham Al
Default

i paid 865.00 for the unit and switch delivered from Godspeed in Michigan
Old 02-11-2006 | 06:21 PM
  #120  
Blownaway's Avatar
Blownaway
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 327
Likes: 0
From: Lindenhurst
Default

dont you need the map harness?



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:59 PM.