View Poll Results : most reliable part 2
most reliable part 2
Aug 19, 2007 | 07:22 AM
Thread Starter
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,405
Likes: 5
From: cincinnati
most reliable part 2
lets try this again
Aug 19, 2007 | 07:49 AM
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 510
Likes: 0
From: Hillside, NJ
I have had my APS for slightly over a year now without one issue (Knock on wood!) ...
Aug 19, 2007 | 08:02 AM
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,190
Likes: 2
From: Orlando
i bought a used turbonetics kit and had it for over 4 months, love it. no problems as long as you relocate those ac lines properly
Aug 19, 2007 | 08:19 AM
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 5,041
Likes: 0
From: Panama City Beach, FL
Daily driven Turbonetics, no problems so far.
Aug 19, 2007 | 08:24 AM
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 4,318
Likes: 0
From: Missouri
None of the kits are more reliable than the next, really. It is all in the tuner.
Aug 19, 2007 | 08:31 AM
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,137
Likes: 11
From: Louisville, KY
The question is not which kit- as all of them can be made safe or destructive.
Aug 19, 2007 | 08:42 AM
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 520
Likes: 0
From: Chicago
Quote:
Originally Posted by abyss
None of the kits are more reliable than the next, really. It is all in the tuner.
Okay and boost spikes are a product of tuning?
Aug 19, 2007 | 09:28 AM
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 8,033
Likes: 1,338
From: Phoenix, AZ
The Stillen is probably the most reliable. Not coincidently, it's also the least powerful.
Aug 19, 2007 | 10:26 AM
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 2,153
Likes: 0
From: Huntersville, NC
Stillen kit for over a year, no problems!
Aug 19, 2007 | 10:43 AM
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 520
Likes: 0
From: Chicago
Quote:
Originally Posted by i8acobra
The Stillen is probably the most reliable. Not coincidently, it's also the least powerful.
That's what I said in the first poll
Aug 19, 2007 | 11:03 AM
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 186
Likes: 3
From: california, bay area
I think another good question to ask is, how many miles do people have on their turbo kit? Because someone can have a kit on for a year but put only 2000 miles while others might put on 10,000 miles.
Aug 19, 2007 | 11:23 AM
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 65
Likes: 0
From: VA
I have been procharged for 20000 miles now and has been solid as a rock. I put 30000 miles plus a year on cars and this kit is very reliable!
Aug 19, 2007 | 01:17 PM
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 252
Likes: 0
From: So.fla
LMFAO!!! Who actually thinks turbonetics is realiable???
Aug 19, 2007 | 02:02 PM
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 2,071
Likes: 0
From: .
Vortech by far. Most here have turbo's, so the outcome is going to be lean toward them.
Aug 19, 2007 | 03:01 PM
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 203
Likes: 0
From: Wilmington NC
Quote:
Originally Posted by abyss
None of the kits are more reliable than the next, really. It is all in the tuner.
+1
Aug 19, 2007 | 03:06 PM
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 35,723
Likes: 6
From: The Recliner of Rage
Quote:
Originally Posted by abyss
None of the kits are more reliable than the next, really. It is all in the tuner.
Those were my thoughts as well.
Aug 19, 2007 | 06:33 PM
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 520
Likes: 0
From: Chicago
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hraesvelg
Those were my thoughts as well.
Quote:
Originally Posted by ABL 2 FLY
+1
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cube
Okay and boost spikes are a product of tuning?
No? Can we say 20 pound boost spikes from a TN kit anyone?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jtrain
LMFAO!!! Who actually thinks turbonetics is realiable???
Aug 20, 2007 | 05:17 AM
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 11,953
Likes: 0
From: NOPE NOPE NOPE
Quote:
Originally Posted by delaharsha
I have been procharged for 20000 miles now and has been solid as a rock. I put 30000 miles plus a year on cars and this kit is very reliable!
So basically you haven't been procharged for a full year yet?
Aug 20, 2007 | 06:42 AM
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,720
Likes: 0
From: Brookfield WI
so there ALLLLLL reliable??? seems like there all very close?? haha
Aug 20, 2007 | 06:49 AM
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 34,715
Likes: 8
From: DMV
Thread failure-goddamn newbs
