Notices
Engine & Drivetrain VQ Power and Delivery

NISMO R-Tune FlyWheel

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 21, 2003 | 01:07 PM
  #21  
Z Powered's Avatar
Z Powered
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 100
Likes: 0
From: XXXXXXXXXXXX
Default

I paid 500...
Reply
Old Jun 21, 2003 | 01:57 PM
  #22  
ZON's Avatar
ZON
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 2,059
Likes: 0
From: norcal
Default

Originally posted by Z Powered
I paid 500...
OH! Well that sounds like the first Nismo performance part that is reasonably priced. And where did you get it?
Reply
Old Jun 21, 2003 | 07:00 PM
  #23  
zoasis's Avatar
zoasis
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 315
Likes: 1
From: Blue Springs, MO
Default

[i]i AGREE WITH Lighter is not always better. I am sure there is a reason NISMO did what they did. [/B]
Performance Nissan spoke with their race car builder and said the following

"I talked to our race car builder this morning and he said the reason Nismo went with the flywheel they did was for streetabilty issues. If the flywheel is too light, yes the RPM's come up instantly but everytime you let off the gas quickly to coast the car will feel as if your hitting the brakes. The mass of the flywheel will allow the car to coast and not be abrupt as throttle is applied and released. Nismo went with a balance that they felt world be the best as people aren't always street racing the car."

so now I'm thinking maybe the Nismo is right for me since I do have to drive it on a daily basis. On the other hand, its not that comfortable of a ride anyway so maybe I should go ***** out with the JUN!




Last edited by zoasis; Jun 21, 2003 at 07:07 PM.
Reply
Old Jun 21, 2003 | 07:41 PM
  #24  
350z4steve's Avatar
350z4steve
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 502
Likes: 0
From: so cal
Default

from the sounds of it if one goes to light with the flywheel it will demand more attention to driving especially with alot of use of the gas and clutch pedal ( whic could lead to premature wear) not to mention having a heavier FW is part of what makes the Z so fun while coasting w/speed momentum of the engine and applying power as needed especially on very winding roads too light and you lose that im thinking?
Reply
Old Jun 21, 2003 | 11:17 PM
  #25  
zland's Avatar
zland
Sponsor
Sport Z Magazine
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 6,086
Likes: 48
From: Oceanside Ca
Default

Educated me guys.... Does reducing the wt of the flywheel only add quicker rev feel or is there actually more hp to the rear wheels?
Reply
Old Jun 22, 2003 | 06:13 AM
  #26  
rickl01's Avatar
rickl01
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
From: Rochester Hills, MI
Default

[QUOTE]Originally posted by zoasis
[B]Performance Nissan spoke with their race car builder and said the following

"I talked to our race car builder this morning and he said the reason Nismo went with the flywheel they did was for streetabilty issues. If the flywheel is too light, yes the RPM's come up instantly but everytime you let off the gas quickly to coast the car will feel as if your hitting the brakes. The mass of the flywheel will allow the car to coast and not be abrupt as throttle is applied and released. Nismo went with a balance that they felt world be the best as people aren't always street racing the car."

Also you might find the idle quality will suffer...usually not importtant, but something to think about.
Reply
Old Jun 22, 2003 | 07:04 AM
  #27  
Traffic's Avatar
Traffic
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 2,310
Likes: 1
From: NJ
Default

Is it worth opening up the transmission if you're just installing a flywheel? I would think labor charges would make it rather expensive.


zland,

A lighter flywheel will allow your engine to rev faster and also make for an HP gain to the wheels.
Reply
Old Jun 22, 2003 | 11:26 AM
  #28  
Z Powered's Avatar
Z Powered
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 100
Likes: 0
From: XXXXXXXXXXXX
Default

Thats why I am having it done when they replace the tranny...
Reply
Old Jun 23, 2003 | 04:43 PM
  #29  
sdpearso's Avatar
sdpearso
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 465
Likes: 0
From: Folsom, CA
Default

See here for my review of the NISMO flywheel:
https://my350z.com/forum/showthread....threadid=33941

I'm a little dissapointed. I wish I would have gone with the JWT.
Reply
Old Jun 23, 2003 | 05:07 PM
  #30  
cbsuper's Avatar
cbsuper
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 469
Likes: 0
From: Phoenix, AZ
Default

Why don't you guys go with the JUN flywheel? It's lighter, cheaper, and very reliable. I ran a Jun flywheel in my Type R and I had nothing but great success with it.

Oh, BTW, thanks for the service, Kyle! I will be looking forward to doing business with you guys in the future.
Reply
Old Jun 23, 2003 | 05:47 PM
  #31  
350zdanny's Avatar
350zdanny
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 1,023
Likes: 0
From: Central Jersey
Default

I also loved the Jun flywheel in my Type R.

Cbsuper - I don't think the ITR flywheel was less thank half the weight of the stock unit. Do you think it'll have a greater effect in the Z since it's so much lighter. And the Type R didn't have a dual mass flywheel to begin with. Just some food for thought.

I'll probably still go with Jun this time.
Reply
Old Jun 23, 2003 | 06:09 PM
  #32  
cbsuper's Avatar
cbsuper
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 469
Likes: 0
From: Phoenix, AZ
Default

Originally posted by 350zdanny
I also loved the Jun flywheel in my Type R.

Cbsuper - I don't think the ITR flywheel was less thank half the weight of the stock unit. Do you think it'll have a greater effect in the Z since it's so much lighter. And the Type R didn't have a dual mass flywheel to begin with. Just some food for thought.

I'll probably still go with Jun this time.
I had weighed the Type R OEM flywheel and it came out at about 17lbs. The Jun flywheel weighed about 9 lbs, so it did make a pretty good difference.

Actually, the flywheel by itself I'm not expecting that much of a difference. It's when you combine it with a heavy duty clutch that you will really start seeing a big difference in revs.
Reply
Old Jun 23, 2003 | 06:21 PM
  #33  
nonmature's Avatar
nonmature
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 165
Likes: 0
From: OC
Default

all I have to say is GO BIG OR GO HOME!!!!

Originally posted by zoasis
Performance Nissan spoke with their race car builder and said the following

"I talked to our race car builder this morning and he said the reason Nismo went with the flywheel they did was for streetabilty issues. If the flywheel is too light, yes the RPM's come up instantly but everytime you let off the gas quickly to coast the car will feel as if your hitting the brakes. The mass of the flywheel will allow the car to coast and not be abrupt as throttle is applied and released. Nismo went with a balance that they felt world be the best as people aren't always street racing the car."

so now I'm thinking maybe the Nismo is right for me since I do have to drive it on a daily basis. On the other hand, its not that comfortable of a ride anyway so maybe I should go ***** out with the JUN!



Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ars88
Zs & Gs For Sale
18
Apr 4, 2016 07:52 AM
nanotech
Exhaust
6
Oct 2, 2015 05:02 AM
Ganglio
Europe
1
Sep 26, 2015 07:06 PM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:04 PM.