Notices
Engine & Drivetrain VQ Power and Delivery

Will the real TT maker please stand up?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 19, 2003 | 06:56 PM
  #1  
neo's Avatar
neo
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 67
Likes: 0
From: KC MO
Default Will the real TT maker please stand up?

Look there is a TT out... (April fools!) It's like everytime I look on this board another half-*** want-to-be company wants to make a TT for the Z. But yet there are NONE that really exist!

WTF? Makes we want to


So will someone who knows something about a real company with a real timeline please ****ing stand up?
Reply
Old Oct 19, 2003 | 07:07 PM
  #2  
spazpilot's Avatar
spazpilot
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 963
Likes: 0
From: Carrollton TX
Default

Greddy and Power Enterprise both will be releasing there turbo kits in november after the sema show
Reply
Old Oct 19, 2003 | 07:10 PM
  #3  
toykilla's Avatar
toykilla
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 2,878
Likes: 0
From: Houston - Texas
Default

yeah all the prototypes seem to have **disappeared**

wtf is up with that crap? .. there is supposed to be one in my area and i have heard nothing of it since it was supposed to be getting tuned 3 months ago
Reply
Old Oct 19, 2003 | 07:12 PM
  #4  
reallyredZ's Avatar
reallyredZ
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 124
Likes: 0
From: NC
Default

Not only the TT settup, but the skyline motor swap. Where did that go? Hell, not only TT, but single too. I remember seeing and hearing of at least 2 people doing it, but they disappeared.
Reply
Old Oct 19, 2003 | 09:03 PM
  #5  
Dissolved's Avatar
Dissolved
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,826
Likes: 0
From: ________
Default

Originally posted by toykilla
yeah all the prototypes seem to have **disappeared**

wtf is up with that crap? .. there is supposed to be one in my area and i have heard nothing of it since it was supposed to be getting tuned 3 months ago

I wonder why? It's because the kits keep blowing the VQ motors probably
Reply
Old Oct 19, 2003 | 09:05 PM
  #6  
spazpilot's Avatar
spazpilot
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 963
Likes: 0
From: Carrollton TX
Default

Originally posted by toykilla
yeah all the prototypes seem to have **disappeared**

wtf is up with that crap? .. there is supposed to be one in my area and i have heard nothing of it since it was supposed to be getting tuned 3 months ago
Are you talking about the TT Jo-Tech is working on? I saw that your from the DFW area, so if thats the one then he is still working on a FMU for it. The motec they were planning on using did not work out as well as they thought.
Reply
Old Oct 20, 2003 | 08:14 AM
  #7  
GrYpS's Avatar
GrYpS
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 52
Likes: 0
From: Chicago, IL
Default

What do u guys think the problem is?

Engine internals being weak, they can't figure out the fuel management or is it something else?
Reply
Old Oct 20, 2003 | 08:32 AM
  #8  
toykilla's Avatar
toykilla
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 2,878
Likes: 0
From: Houston - Texas
Default

yes it was the jo-tech one (skidazzle).. seems to have disappeared since HIN.. it would be nice to have updates occasionally
Reply
Old Oct 20, 2003 | 08:37 AM
  #9  
ravaz's Avatar
ravaz
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 919
Likes: 1
From: Raleigh, NC
Default

It's Fuel management, no one can really get it right.
Reply
Old Oct 20, 2003 | 08:44 AM
  #10  
toykilla's Avatar
toykilla
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 2,878
Likes: 0
From: Houston - Texas
Default

well SEMA is soon so i am counting my pennies
Reply
Old Oct 20, 2003 | 08:52 AM
  #11  
ravaz's Avatar
ravaz
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 919
Likes: 1
From: Raleigh, NC
Default

I'm really hoping someone has a solution, that hasn't been made public yet.
Reply
Old Oct 20, 2003 | 09:42 AM
  #12  
spazpilot's Avatar
spazpilot
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 963
Likes: 0
From: Carrollton TX
Default

The only fix I could think of is like stillen's. I haven't heard anything bad. It would just cost alot and would require a mod to the intake plenium for additional injectors.
Reply
Old Oct 20, 2003 | 10:11 AM
  #13  
ravaz's Avatar
ravaz
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 919
Likes: 1
From: Raleigh, NC
Default

Well Stillen did the additional injector to keep cost down instead of upgrading stock injectors to larger injectors. I thought that's what I heard.
Reply
Old Oct 20, 2003 | 10:55 AM
  #14  
Yielar's Avatar
Yielar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 217
Likes: 0
From: British Columbia, Canada
Default

It's the 10.3:1 compression that's giving them the headaches !
Reply
Old Oct 20, 2003 | 11:35 AM
  #15  
ravaz's Avatar
ravaz
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 919
Likes: 1
From: Raleigh, NC
Default

I don't really think it's the compression that's giving them the headache. There are many cars out with compression like ours and higher, that are being supercharged and turbo'd and running fine, just not turning the boost up to anything crazy. It's this returnless fuel system our car uses and the ecu that's giving them a big headache.
Reply
Old Oct 20, 2003 | 11:59 AM
  #16  
Ag Z's Avatar
Ag Z
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 134
Likes: 0
From: Hampton Roads VA
Default

Fbody LS1's don't have a return on the fuel system(run a bigger injector vs increasing line pressure). But we do have a way to change the stock ECU/PCM computer

The problems I see are no way of pulling any advance out of the timing map and can't tell the computer you have bigger injectors. Without changing those two adding boost and getting great results is going to be near impossible.

I am amazed that the engine stay together with 7 or 8 psi the ATI is showing the engine. There must be a lower octane timing map like the LS1 PCM has that it's defaulting to when the engine starts to ping. On a LS1 it's there incase the owner puts 87 in the tank or there is a mix up at the statioin and 87 is mixed with the 9X octane. A cheap failsafe in the program.

What would be interesting is to data log the spark advance for a stock Z and a blown Z for a run then compare numbers. I have always read that you take about 2* our for every pound of boost you run. Either there is room for more timing on a NA motor or something is pulling timing out on a FI car.
Reply
Old Oct 20, 2003 | 12:43 PM
  #17  
ravaz's Avatar
ravaz
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 919
Likes: 1
From: Raleigh, NC
Default

You already know I agree with you on the whole timing issue. I think there will be a solution soon enough for all of the headaches we are dealing with now. I'm sure somoene is working on it as we speak, you figure with the sales of this car, the aftermarket will be pretty big. I'm waiting on a call back from a company about the whole timing thing. I'm not sure if their product will work, it does in many other cars, but who knows with this mess.
Reply
Old Oct 20, 2003 | 02:00 PM
  #18  
DLin05's Avatar
DLin05
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 350
Likes: 0
From: Atlanta
Default

maybe i missed it but since were listing all the things missing...whatever happened to the dyno day for the NA cars with over 300 whp? any results or it is still too be concluded?
Reply
Old Oct 20, 2003 | 02:28 PM
  #19  
spazpilot's Avatar
spazpilot
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 963
Likes: 0
From: Carrollton TX
Default

On the returnless fuel system that we have did anyone notice that the TT kit PE is making comes with a regulator? Does this mean that on that kit we will have to install the return line? Asked Cheston but got no response. The only time you need a fuel regulator is you have a return system, so I guess that is how they fixed the bigger injector issue!! Any comments?
Reply
Old Oct 20, 2003 | 06:50 PM
  #20  
zland's Avatar
zland
Sponsor
Sport Z Magazine
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 6,086
Likes: 48
From: Oceanside Ca
Default

Originally posted by DLin05
maybe i missed it but since were listing all the things missing...whatever happened to the dyno day for the NA cars with over 300 whp? any results or it is still too be concluded?
Concerning the dyno day and Richard 350Z. I met him at the willow springs track last Friday. He posted his dyno run in which at least 100 guys witnessed. A number of guys on this forum were basically crucifying him on line. All he did was post what he got on the dyno. Greg V of Mossy, whose dealer built the motor offered to have his Mossy NA car dyno'ed by the guys being so critical.

My point is that it is easy to get on line and flame guys that have taken their Z, spent thousands of dollars modifying it and paving the way for all of us by risking their warranty and investment. Every time a guy posts a dyno and modifies their car, it is educating all of us on the possibilities of the VQ. Now, the same guys that are challenging them about doing another dyno, where are they now? After guys spent maybe 3-5,000 dollars on their cars, is it the guys challenging their dyno results are not willing to put out the cost of a dyno? Maybe they can tell us.

All I know is Richard is one heck of a nice guy and now he feels like he does not want to post here too much because of how people blasted him. All he wanted to do was add hp to his car and he was excited to have such a good dyno gain. Is that a crime?

I know people want to be sure to get accurate results but I just felt like everyone was a little rough on Richard. I hope the dyno day is done, not to prove anyone right or wrong to point a finger, but just to gain knowledge of hp gain on those mods. That is why we are here, to improve all of our Z’s.

I am still debating if I want to go NA or FI. All information I learn from here helps me in that decision.
__________________

Last edited by zland; Oct 20, 2003 at 06:58 PM.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:53 AM.