Notices
Engine & Drivetrain VQ Power and Delivery

copper turbo kit piping

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 9, 2010 | 01:38 PM
  #1  
redlinedifterzx's Avatar
redlinedifterzx
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 95
Likes: 0
From: thousand oaks california
Default copper turbo kit piping

i just had a thought and weather its good or bad i wanted to see what you guys think
I was reading a while back that some company back in japan used a copper core radiator because it offered better cooling on there time attack z and im well aware that alot of companies use cooper in there ac units as well as portable ac units like the ones iv seen while in the corps. so my question is when it comes to the piping from the ic to the manifold why not use copper piping? does aircraft aluminum have better cooling and heat dispensing properties than copper? or am i totally in off the ball with this train of thought
Reply
Old May 9, 2010 | 01:52 PM
  #2  
Chris@FsP's Avatar
Chris@FsP
Vendor - Former Vendor
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 1,601
Likes: 0
From: Tulsa
Default

Copper charge piping would be SICK. I've read that copper dissipates heat a little bit better than aluminum, but even if that weren't the case, I would do it just for the look.
Reply
Old May 9, 2010 | 02:09 PM
  #3  
NiZMo1o1's Avatar
NiZMo1o1
New Member
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 232
Likes: 0
From: South Florida
Default

hmm I never seen Copper pipe up to 2.25/2.5 inchs..

altho this gives me a good idea on copper spraying the fins on a radator, wonder if that would make any difference...
Reply
Old May 9, 2010 | 02:18 PM
  #4  
Boosted Performance's Avatar
Boosted Performance
Vendor - Former Vendor
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,782
Likes: 18
From: Edmonton, AB
Default

Copper is heavy as fawk (if you are refering to your regular plumbing copper) , compared to aluminium ofcourse.
Reply
Old May 9, 2010 | 02:21 PM
  #5  
Hexxus's Avatar
Hexxus
Registered User
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,660
Likes: 2
From: PA/MD
Default

That would be mighty expensive.
Reply
Old May 9, 2010 | 03:13 PM
  #6  
winchman's Avatar
winchman
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 2,335
Likes: 5
From: Georgia
Default

There's a reason thieves go around stealing copper plumbing, wiring, and AC stuff. It's EXPENSIVE. Low pressure 3" copper tubing sells for about $30 a foot. It's also three+ times as heavy as aluminum.
Reply
Old May 9, 2010 | 03:23 PM
  #7  
crsracing19's Avatar
crsracing19
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 407
Likes: 0
From: ocean side
Default

it cant be that heavy of course aluminum weighs nothing but whats an added 5-7 pounds on a charge pipe is you get superior cooling
Reply
Old May 9, 2010 | 04:05 PM
  #8  
Pshopcars107's Avatar
Pshopcars107
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 132
Likes: 0
From: Delaware
Default

the copper piping would oxidize and look like ****... that's why plumbing pipe is always
wrapped up with insulation.
Reply
Old May 9, 2010 | 05:10 PM
  #9  
crsracing19's Avatar
crsracing19
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 407
Likes: 0
From: ocean side
Default

just make sure to keep it polished put a coating on the inside of the tube that would keep it from oxidizing if there such a thing
Reply
Old May 9, 2010 | 08:34 PM
  #10  
winchman's Avatar
winchman
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 2,335
Likes: 5
From: Georgia
Default

Several pounds mounted high up right over the front wheels can't be good for handling.

The thermal conductivity of aluminum is several times that of steel and about half that of copper.
Reply
Old May 9, 2010 | 08:51 PM
  #11  
redlinedifterzx's Avatar
redlinedifterzx
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 95
Likes: 0
From: thousand oaks california
Default

come on through on a mount if its that heavy but but what say like five feet of copper piping can b more than 7-10 pounds heavier than alum plus its spread out over the length of the chargepipe
Reply
Old May 9, 2010 | 09:03 PM
  #12  
scotts300's Avatar
scotts300
350Z-holic
Premier Member
iTrader: (46)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 8,193
Likes: 7
From: Away
Default

Originally Posted by redlinedifterzx
i just had a thought and weather its good or bad i wanted to see what you guys think
I was reading a while back that some company back in japan used a copper core radiator because it offered better cooling on there time attack z and im well aware that alot of companies use cooper in there ac units as well as portable ac units like the ones iv seen while in the corps. so my question is when it comes to the piping from the ic to the manifold why not use copper piping? does aircraft aluminum have better cooling and heat dispensing properties than copper? or am i totally in off the ball with this train of thought
I thought about making a copper-cored intercooler for 300ZX TTs a few years ago. Porsche used to use copper cores for their radiators - it's not new technology. Copper about 2x the heat transfer as aluminum, so it would be much better in that respect. We use it exclusively (aerospace) since cost is no object (generally).

Originally Posted by redlinedifterzx
come on through on a mount if its that heavy but but what say like five feet of copper piping can b more than 7-10 pounds heavier than alum plus its spread out over the length of the chargepipe
Work the math. Calculate the volume based on the length and assume a wall thickness. Tell us what you get.
Reply
Old May 10, 2010 | 04:39 AM
  #13  
Quamen's Avatar
Quamen
Registered User
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,383
Likes: 2
From: Wisconsin
Default

Originally Posted by scotts300
I thought about making a copper-cored intercooler for 300ZX TTs a few years ago. Porsche used to use copper cores for their radiators - it's not new technology. Copper about 2x the heat transfer as aluminum, so it would be much better in that respect. We use it exclusively (aerospace) since cost is no object (generally).



Work the math. Calculate the volume based on the length and assume a wall thickness. Tell us what you get.
It will also absorb engine temperatures 2x faster than aluminum. I woudl bet that any gains would be minimal at best.
Reply
Old May 10, 2010 | 05:32 AM
  #14  
rcdash's Avatar
rcdash
New Member
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 6,474
Likes: 65
From: Chapel Hill, NC
Default

Copper cannot compete. Aluminum for weight. W/M injection for cooling.
Reply
Old May 10, 2010 | 06:21 AM
  #15  
Ruthless18x's Avatar
Ruthless18x
Registered User
iTrader: (59)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 6,334
Likes: 6
From: My Self Created Hell
Default

Originally Posted by Pshopcars107
the copper piping would oxidize and look like ****... that's why plumbing pipe is always
wrapped up with insulation.
You're an idiot. Copper pipe is not insulated to protect from oxidation.

Either way copper piping wouldn't be cost effective or practical. You would almost need a hybrid copper material to get the bends correct. Normal Type L and Type K copper would either be too stiff and heavy or too flimsy to hold it's shape through the bending process.

It's a good idea in theory, but not practical.
Reply
Old May 10, 2010 | 06:30 AM
  #16  
Hokie350Z's Avatar
Hokie350Z
Registered User
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 427
Likes: 0
From: Cincinnati, OH
Default

It's heavier and it would corrode super fast and if any water got inside the IC, your engine would be F'ed

FTL
Reply
Old May 10, 2010 | 06:43 AM
  #17  
scotts300's Avatar
scotts300
350Z-holic
Premier Member
iTrader: (46)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 8,193
Likes: 7
From: Away
Default

Whipple makes something similar already: http://www.whipplesuperchargers.com/...sp?ProdID=1180
Reply
Old May 10, 2010 | 06:45 AM
  #18  
scotts300's Avatar
scotts300
350Z-holic
Premier Member
iTrader: (46)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 8,193
Likes: 7
From: Away
Default

Originally Posted by Quamen
It will also absorb engine temperatures 2x faster than aluminum. I woudl bet that any gains would be minimal at best.
Yes, but my idea was to coil and braze copper tubing around it and run chilled water through that outer tubing to cool the air charge itself. It all just started to get too expensive to even make the first one.
Reply
Old May 10, 2010 | 08:39 AM
  #19  
binder's Avatar
binder
New Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 6,457
Likes: 7
From: terre haute, IN; STL, MO
Default

also did anyone think of the fact that a charge pipe isn't built for cooling? it's smooth on the inside so when you push air through it as fast as an FI car would the air woudn't be in contact long enough with the metal to make a difference.

The only way this would make a difference is if it was an intercooler or radiator in which there is sufficient surface area able to exchange the heat. THEN you have the fact that the charge pipe is sitting right above the headers on the car under the hood. What is cooling that charge pipe down to allow it to cool down the air inside of it? NOTHING.

Also, you're forgetting that the air outside of that charge tube will probably be higher temp than inside therefore if there was any exchange of heat (which there won't be due to surface area) then it would absorb the heat from the engine bay and dissipate it to the cooler air inside the charge tube. Negative effect.

Leave the thinking to the engineers that have obviously decided that it's pointless to change the material of a charge pipe.
Reply
Old May 10, 2010 | 09:24 AM
  #20  
AutoDetour's Avatar
AutoDetour
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 42
Likes: 0
From: Oregon
Default

The best option IMO would be a copper only Intercooler to cool the boosted pressure more efficiently then have the rest of the tubes be aluminum or steel and have them insulated to prevent them from soaking in in the engine bay temperatures. May be a new R/D project on the rise...
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:27 PM.