Replica's are TEH SUCKZ......
Originally Posted by Cux350z
Robin, what would it take for you to change your avatar? he is teh sukz lol
Originally Posted by Cux350z
Robin, what would it take for you to change your avatar? he is teh sukz lol
Besides, if I could change it, I'd just change to a different Cobain picture.....like this one, this is what I use on the other sites:
Originally Posted by THE TECH
Trust me, if your idea was being stolen and copied, most people would think twice about what they are posting about being pro-copies.
Originally Posted by phreaktor
So you are saying it would be ok if the original designer was receiving royalties? Who does that benefit other than the designer? Sorry, but I spend my money to benefit ME and maximize MY spending power, not to "support" the already rich person I'm buying it from.
[offensive post]
o my bad robin. I thought you had this guy as your avatar:

whew, rofl. Cleared that up
keep cobain then. I was always wondering why you had 'kroeger' in your avatar, makes a bit more sense tho.
[/offensive post]
o my bad robin. I thought you had this guy as your avatar:

whew, rofl. Cleared that up
keep cobain then. I was always wondering why you had 'kroeger' in your avatar, makes a bit more sense tho.
[/offensive post]
Originally Posted by Jim@Showstoppers
Unless you patent your design, not copyright laws are going to stop other companies from making a replica.
Since when are the designers/makers of authentic body kits rich?
Most of them do it for the love of the sport.
The company Vertex started by the guy wanting to make an SC300 kit when no one else had it. Hes just another car enthusiast trying to make a living. They deserve the money more than billy bob who comes through and decides to make money off their stylings.
Last edited by saberphx; Dec 18, 2007 at 09:20 AM.
Originally Posted by Jim@Showstoppers
Unless you patent your design, not copyright laws are going to stop other companies from making a replica.
Originally Posted by Cux350z
[offensive post]
o my bad robin. I thought you had this guy as your avatar:

whew, rofl. Cleared that up
keep cobain then. I was always wondering why you had 'kroeger' in your avatar, makes a bit more sense tho.
[/offensive post]
o my bad robin. I thought you had this guy as your avatar:

whew, rofl. Cleared that up
keep cobain then. I was always wondering why you had 'kroeger' in your avatar, makes a bit more sense tho.
[/offensive post]
I'd rather you staple my nut sack to a stump and inflict pain on my nuts with a hammer.....than listen to a f'ing Nickelback song.
I'll never forgive your comment...payback will be due at ZdayZ......
Originally Posted by THE TECH
That's the unfortunate part about it. And even then, there are loopholes. The fact is, that each company KNOWS it's doing wrong. They just don't care. They know it's unethical, but when it comes to making money, they don't care who gets hurt as long as their pockets are lined with cash.
Thats where the real debate comes in. Take for instance the Seibon TS2 and Top Secret hoods. I'm sure Seibon replicating this hood caused some loss in revenue for Top Secret and their distributors (very few), but think how many shops have gained revenue from the sale of Seibon's replicas. Or the money saved by the consumers who turned around and spent that extra money on other parts.
Originally Posted by Jim@Showstoppers
What you find unfortunate, some find fortunate.
Thats where the real debate comes in. Take for instance the Seibon TS2 and Top Secret hoods. I'm sure Seibon replicating this hood caused some loss in revenue for Top Secret and their distributors (very few), but think how many shops have gained revenue from the sale of Seibon's replicas. Or the money saved by the consumers who turned around and spent that extra money on other parts.
Thats where the real debate comes in. Take for instance the Seibon TS2 and Top Secret hoods. I'm sure Seibon replicating this hood caused some loss in revenue for Top Secret and their distributors (very few), but think how many shops have gained revenue from the sale of Seibon's replicas. Or the money saved by the consumers who turned around and spent that extra money on other parts.
Since Seibon started off as a replica company and continues that trend today, there is really no debate about it. Nothing can justify stealing other's designs, period.
Originally Posted by THE TECH
Used to...no longer. Their products are terrible besides the fact that they just are copiers. They do have a handlful of non-copies though.
I thought you still sold them, so your comments just took me back a bit.
Originally Posted by buzzardmountain
Well you could see the potential irony then.......someone preaching about replica's but making $$ from selling them.
I thought you still sold them, so your comments just took me back a bit.
I thought you still sold them, so your comments just took me back a bit.

I know everyone wants to find every piece of minute information in order to make it more compelling that it's ok to make copies. It is not, period.
Originally Posted by THE TECH
Like I said, I no longer sell them.
I know everyone wants to find every piece of minute information in order to make it more compelling that it's ok to make copies. It is not, period.
I know everyone wants to find every piece of minute information in order to make it more compelling that it's ok to make copies. It is not, period.
Originally Posted by Jim@Showstoppers
In your ethical standpoint, it's not. To others it is.
Originally Posted by Jim@Showstoppers
In your ethical standpoint, it's not. To others it is.
Originally Posted by THE TECH
Like I said, I no longer sell them.
I know everyone wants to find every piece of minute information in order to make it more compelling that it's ok to make copies. It is not, period.
I know everyone wants to find every piece of minute information in order to make it more compelling that it's ok to make copies. It is not, period.
I ask because there's a vendor here who quite often gets on the "replica's are teh suckz" soap box, but still sells replica's. His argument is that it's basically ok to do so if the replica's are manufactured just as well as the OG.
They have not posted in this thread yet........
Registered User
iTrader: (34)
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 5,800
Likes: 0
From: Fayetteville, NC but from 757
Originally Posted by sofa king
id rather buy old navy than abercrombie. but i like to have a few article of the 'crombie in my closet. does that analogy make any sense? lol.
i personally would 'skimp out' and buy replica stuff for Aero products. but if i were to ever purchase go-fast bits id go authentic.
i personally would 'skimp out' and buy replica stuff for Aero products. but if i were to ever purchase go-fast bits id go authentic.
I have the Shine V2 and I can tell you it's top notch! True, its a replica, but I think it rivals or surpasses the orginal in craftsmanship! On the other hand I would never buy a set of "knockoff' rims or no name FI piece!
When you have quality pieces on your car, like rims, FI kit, exhaust, Carbon pieces(replica or not), no one is gonna question if your V2 is Shine or Nismo!
Last edited by TSG-Z; Dec 18, 2007 at 10:20 AM.
Originally Posted by buzzardmountain
Did you have a recent epiphany or was it OK to sell those replica's when you did.....?
I ask because there's a vendor here who quite often gets on the "replica's are teh suckz" soap box, but still sells replica's. His argument is that it's basically ok to do so if the replica's are manufactured just as well as the OG.
They have not posted in this thread yet........
I ask because there's a vendor here who quite often gets on the "replica's are teh suckz" soap box, but still sells replica's. His argument is that it's basically ok to do so if the replica's are manufactured just as well as the OG.
They have not posted in this thread yet........

I think I've made my point though so there's no reason for me to continue debating the issue with people who think stealing designs is ok as long as they sell them for cheaper than the originals.
You make the choice on what side to support...the thieves or the originators. One is ok and the other is not. There is no gray area.
Just take a moment and think of being in the shoes of the original manufacturer/designer. If you saw someone taking what you made and exploiting it, you would think twice about all this.
You make the choice on what side to support...the thieves or the originators. One is ok and the other is not. There is no gray area.
Just take a moment and think of being in the shoes of the original manufacturer/designer. If you saw someone taking what you made and exploiting it, you would think twice about all this.







