Notices
Exterior & Interior 350Z Body modification, interior styling and lighting

Replica's are TEH SUCKZ......

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 18, 2007 | 08:36 AM
  #41  
THE TECH's Avatar
THE TECH
Registered User
iTrader: (154)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 10,735
Likes: 0
From: Hills of Anaheim
Default

Originally Posted by Cux350z
Robin, what would it take for you to change your avatar? he is teh sukz lol
He can only change to a noncustom one unless he upgrades to a paid membership.
Reply
Old Dec 18, 2007 | 08:38 AM
  #42  
THE TECH's Avatar
THE TECH
Registered User
iTrader: (154)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 10,735
Likes: 0
From: Hills of Anaheim
Default

Trust me, if your idea was being stolen and copied, most people would think twice about what they are posting about being pro-copies.
Reply
Old Dec 18, 2007 | 08:39 AM
  #43  
buzzardmountain's Avatar
buzzardmountain
Thread Starter
New Member
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 9,898
Likes: 7
From: Flying Low....
Default

Originally Posted by Cux350z
Robin, what would it take for you to change your avatar? he is teh sukz lol
What THE TECH said.....it would involve me paying the site $$$, to which I have no desire.

Besides, if I could change it, I'd just change to a different Cobain picture.....like this one, this is what I use on the other sites:

Reply
Old Dec 18, 2007 | 08:55 AM
  #44  
phreaktor's Avatar
phreaktor
Design Engineer
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 28,233
Likes: 33
From: The Marketplace
Default

Originally Posted by THE TECH
Trust me, if your idea was being stolen and copied, most people would think twice about what they are posting about being pro-copies.
So you are saying it would be ok if the original designer was receiving royalties? Who does that benefit other than the designer? Sorry, but I spend my money to benefit ME and maximize MY spending power, not to "support" the already rich person I'm buying it from.
Reply
Old Dec 18, 2007 | 09:07 AM
  #45  
THE TECH's Avatar
THE TECH
Registered User
iTrader: (154)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 10,735
Likes: 0
From: Hills of Anaheim
Default

Originally Posted by phreaktor
So you are saying it would be ok if the original designer was receiving royalties? Who does that benefit other than the designer? Sorry, but I spend my money to benefit ME and maximize MY spending power, not to "support" the already rich person I'm buying it from.
Like I said, you would be looking through different glasses if people were taking money out of your pockets for something that you designed. For some reason, you think that the manufacturer doesn't deserve what they want for it so as long as someone steals it and sells it cheaper to you, that's ok.
Reply
Old Dec 18, 2007 | 09:14 AM
  #46  
Cux350z's Avatar
Cux350z
hatersgonnahate
Premier Member
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (162)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 15,390
Likes: 1,085
From: Greenville, SC
Default

[offensive post]

o my bad robin. I thought you had this guy as your avatar:


whew, rofl. Cleared that up

keep cobain then. I was always wondering why you had 'kroeger' in your avatar, makes a bit more sense tho.

[/offensive post]
Reply
Old Dec 18, 2007 | 09:17 AM
  #47  
saberphx's Avatar
saberphx
Registered User
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 4,190
Likes: 0
From: america
Default

Originally Posted by Jim@Showstoppers
Unless you patent your design, not copyright laws are going to stop other companies from making a replica.
And If I do?

Since when are the designers/makers of authentic body kits rich?
Most of them do it for the love of the sport.
The company Vertex started by the guy wanting to make an SC300 kit when no one else had it. Hes just another car enthusiast trying to make a living. They deserve the money more than billy bob who comes through and decides to make money off their stylings.

Last edited by saberphx; Dec 18, 2007 at 09:20 AM.
Reply
Old Dec 18, 2007 | 09:37 AM
  #48  
THE TECH's Avatar
THE TECH
Registered User
iTrader: (154)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 10,735
Likes: 0
From: Hills of Anaheim
Default

Originally Posted by Jim@Showstoppers
Unless you patent your design, not copyright laws are going to stop other companies from making a replica.
That's the unfortunate part about it. And even then, there are loopholes. The fact is, that each company KNOWS it's doing wrong. They just don't care. They know it's unethical, but when it comes to making money, they don't care who gets hurt as long as their pockets are lined with cash.
Reply
Old Dec 18, 2007 | 09:45 AM
  #49  
buzzardmountain's Avatar
buzzardmountain
Thread Starter
New Member
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 9,898
Likes: 7
From: Flying Low....
Default

Originally Posted by Cux350z
[offensive post]

o my bad robin. I thought you had this guy as your avatar:


whew, rofl. Cleared that up

keep cobain then. I was always wondering why you had 'kroeger' in your avatar, makes a bit more sense tho.

[/offensive post]
If I had the ability right now....I'd push the ban button on you after that comment.

I'd rather you staple my nut sack to a stump and inflict pain on my nuts with a hammer.....than listen to a f'ing Nickelback song.

I'll never forgive your comment...payback will be due at ZdayZ......
Reply
Old Dec 18, 2007 | 09:50 AM
  #50  
Jim@Showstoppers's Avatar
Jim@Showstoppers
Banned
iTrader: (157)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 4,866
Likes: 1
From: Monrovia, CA
Default

Originally Posted by THE TECH
That's the unfortunate part about it. And even then, there are loopholes. The fact is, that each company KNOWS it's doing wrong. They just don't care. They know it's unethical, but when it comes to making money, they don't care who gets hurt as long as their pockets are lined with cash.
What you find unfortunate, some find fortunate.

Thats where the real debate comes in. Take for instance the Seibon TS2 and Top Secret hoods. I'm sure Seibon replicating this hood caused some loss in revenue for Top Secret and their distributors (very few), but think how many shops have gained revenue from the sale of Seibon's replicas. Or the money saved by the consumers who turned around and spent that extra money on other parts.
Reply
Old Dec 18, 2007 | 09:56 AM
  #51  
THE TECH's Avatar
THE TECH
Registered User
iTrader: (154)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 10,735
Likes: 0
From: Hills of Anaheim
Default

Originally Posted by Jim@Showstoppers
What you find unfortunate, some find fortunate.

Thats where the real debate comes in. Take for instance the Seibon TS2 and Top Secret hoods. I'm sure Seibon replicating this hood caused some loss in revenue for Top Secret and their distributors (very few), but think how many shops have gained revenue from the sale of Seibon's replicas. Or the money saved by the consumers who turned around and spent that extra money on other parts.
Since Top Secret never made a hood like that for the Z, there's really no debate. They just made a style similar to that.

Since Seibon started off as a replica company and continues that trend today, there is really no debate about it. Nothing can justify stealing other's designs, period.
Reply
Old Dec 18, 2007 | 09:59 AM
  #52  
buzzardmountain's Avatar
buzzardmountain
Thread Starter
New Member
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 9,898
Likes: 7
From: Flying Low....
Default

Originally Posted by THE TECH
Used to...no longer. Their products are terrible besides the fact that they just are copiers. They do have a handlful of non-copies though.
Well you could see the potential irony then.......someone preaching about replica's but making $$ from selling them.

I thought you still sold them, so your comments just took me back a bit.
Reply
Old Dec 18, 2007 | 10:03 AM
  #53  
THE TECH's Avatar
THE TECH
Registered User
iTrader: (154)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 10,735
Likes: 0
From: Hills of Anaheim
Default

Originally Posted by buzzardmountain
Well you could see the potential irony then.......someone preaching about replica's but making $$ from selling them.

I thought you still sold them, so your comments just took me back a bit.
Like I said, I no longer sell them.

I know everyone wants to find every piece of minute information in order to make it more compelling that it's ok to make copies. It is not, period.
Reply
Old Dec 18, 2007 | 10:04 AM
  #54  
Jim@Showstoppers's Avatar
Jim@Showstoppers
Banned
iTrader: (157)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 4,866
Likes: 1
From: Monrovia, CA
Default

Originally Posted by THE TECH
Like I said, I no longer sell them.

I know everyone wants to find every piece of minute information in order to make it more compelling that it's ok to make copies. It is not, period.
In your ethical standpoint, it's not. To others it is.
Reply
Old Dec 18, 2007 | 10:05 AM
  #55  
THE TECH's Avatar
THE TECH
Registered User
iTrader: (154)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 10,735
Likes: 0
From: Hills of Anaheim
Default

Originally Posted by Jim@Showstoppers
In your ethical standpoint, it's not. To others it is.
There is no standpoint bro. If you steal, then it's unethical. You aren't Robin Hood.
Reply
Old Dec 18, 2007 | 10:06 AM
  #56  
THE TECH's Avatar
THE TECH
Registered User
iTrader: (154)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 10,735
Likes: 0
From: Hills of Anaheim
Default

Originally Posted by Jim@Showstoppers
In your ethical standpoint, it's not. To others it is.
Like I have said before. Come up with an original product then watch someone copy it and see if you have the same answer. The only reason you are condoning copies is cause you're making money off them.
Reply
Old Dec 18, 2007 | 10:14 AM
  #57  
buzzardmountain's Avatar
buzzardmountain
Thread Starter
New Member
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 9,898
Likes: 7
From: Flying Low....
Default

Originally Posted by THE TECH
Like I said, I no longer sell them.

I know everyone wants to find every piece of minute information in order to make it more compelling that it's ok to make copies. It is not, period.
Did you have a recent epiphany or was it OK to sell those replica's when you did.....?

I ask because there's a vendor here who quite often gets on the "replica's are teh suckz" soap box, but still sells replica's. His argument is that it's basically ok to do so if the replica's are manufactured just as well as the OG.

They have not posted in this thread yet........
Reply
Old Dec 18, 2007 | 10:16 AM
  #58  
TSG-Z's Avatar
TSG-Z
Registered User
iTrader: (34)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 5,800
Likes: 0
From: Fayetteville, NC but from 757
Default

Originally Posted by sofa king
id rather buy old navy than abercrombie. but i like to have a few article of the 'crombie in my closet. does that analogy make any sense? lol.

i personally would 'skimp out' and buy replica stuff for Aero products. but if i were to ever purchase go-fast bits id go authentic.
+1

I have the Shine V2 and I can tell you it's top notch! True, its a replica, but I think it rivals or surpasses the orginal in craftsmanship! On the other hand I would never buy a set of "knockoff' rims or no name FI piece!

When you have quality pieces on your car, like rims, FI kit, exhaust, Carbon pieces(replica or not), no one is gonna question if your V2 is Shine or Nismo!

Last edited by TSG-Z; Dec 18, 2007 at 10:20 AM.
Reply
Old Dec 18, 2007 | 10:20 AM
  #59  
THE TECH's Avatar
THE TECH
Registered User
iTrader: (154)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 10,735
Likes: 0
From: Hills of Anaheim
Default

Originally Posted by buzzardmountain
Did you have a recent epiphany or was it OK to sell those replica's when you did.....?

I ask because there's a vendor here who quite often gets on the "replica's are teh suckz" soap box, but still sells replica's. His argument is that it's basically ok to do so if the replica's are manufactured just as well as the OG.

They have not posted in this thread yet........
Like I mentioned above, it was only the 350z TS ones. They were not replicas since TS never made an actual hood like that for the Z. Either way bro, if I wanted to I could still sell them and make money. Yet, I am not. Enough said.
Reply
Old Dec 18, 2007 | 10:24 AM
  #60  
THE TECH's Avatar
THE TECH
Registered User
iTrader: (154)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 10,735
Likes: 0
From: Hills of Anaheim
Default

I think I've made my point though so there's no reason for me to continue debating the issue with people who think stealing designs is ok as long as they sell them for cheaper than the originals.

You make the choice on what side to support...the thieves or the originators. One is ok and the other is not. There is no gray area.

Just take a moment and think of being in the shoes of the original manufacturer/designer. If you saw someone taking what you made and exploiting it, you would think twice about all this.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:55 PM.