Notices
Exterior & Interior 350Z Body modification, interior styling and lighting

Installed! "Ground Effector" a unique underfloor spoiler that increases downforce

Old Mar 16, 2004 | 05:53 PM
  #21  
Haji's Avatar
Haji
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 165
Likes: 0
From: Tokyo
Default

It seems that some of you can't believe what I'm saying.

Concerning the downforce it is logically correct. The mod works just like the lip spoiler, but the only difference is that it is placed behind the front wheel.

About how it feels, maybe it is psychlogical, but I did feel that the lane change action was more stable at 60 kmh.
Anyway I'll test the car at Tsukuba next month.

About the reliability, this mod is tested by many professional drivers (incl. Aguri Suzuki) so I believe it works.

The mod is made of aluminium panel plus stiff rubber fin (the red part).

If you still think that this item is fake, well, nobody is gonna stop you from not buying it.
Reply
Old Mar 16, 2004 | 07:53 PM
  #22  
reen's Avatar
reen
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 281
Likes: 0
From: SoCal
Default

Just 'cause Dan Marino sports Isotoner gloves doesn't mean I'm gonna wear 'em on my next mountaineering trip.

I prefer to use my own brain when evaluating a product instead of trusting someone else's.

Anyway, the front lip spoiler prevents air from going underneath the car in the first place. This thing takes air that's already under the car and directs it downward (as well as outward, as they claim). For every action there is an equal and opposite reaction, so if your car is pushing air downward, the same air is pushing your car upward.
Reply
Old Mar 16, 2004 | 10:13 PM
  #23  
Haji's Avatar
Haji
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 165
Likes: 0
From: Tokyo
Default

reen,

When deciding about a motor sports' product I'd prefer the evaluation of a former F1 driver rather than an amateur's (= my personal) feeling.
But if you don't prefer doing that, that is your idea, which is totally fine.

Speaking about the air flow under the floor don't forget that the bottom of 350Z is far from "flat bottom". When the car is in motion there is air streaming in various directions, especially right behind the tyres, which is causing resistance.
The Ground Effector is supposed to control the air flow, so that overall the resistance will decrease, and stability to increase. It's different from putting the tail spoiler upside down.
(I suppose)
Reply
Old Mar 17, 2004 | 05:28 AM
  #24  
AndyB's Avatar
AndyB
New Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,389
Likes: 5
From: Connecticut
Default chin spoiler

It is not like a chin spoiler. With a chin defelctor you prevent air from going under the car.

Once the car is already comitted to going under the car putting something in it's path doesn't sound like a good idea. I thought most race cars were dead flat underneath so they would not disturb the air under the car.

Once air is under the car you want a smooth flow to get it out of there. To me it seems this device would increase pressure in front of it. It _might_ reduce pressure behind it though.

Also, I really can't believe anybody could feel the difference of such a small spoiler at the low speeds claimed. I am not trying to be negative, but since people's money is at stake I need to question that particular claim.


Sorry, but this is starting to sound a little too much like a miracle product to me.
Reply
Old Mar 17, 2004 | 05:31 AM
  #25  
AndyB's Avatar
AndyB
New Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,389
Likes: 5
From: Connecticut
Default Minivan!

PS: If you look at the links in the origninal post they seem to be saying the same product will help a minivan to.

Are we really ot belive the same product that helps a Z (with low ground clearance) will also help a minivan that is several inches higher?

Dubious indeed.
Reply
Old Mar 17, 2004 | 05:33 AM
  #26  
AndyB's Avatar
AndyB
New Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,389
Likes: 5
From: Connecticut
Default Picture

In action :
Attached Images  
Reply
Old Mar 17, 2004 | 06:32 AM
  #27  
ares's Avatar
ares
Veteran
Premier Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 10,816
Likes: 2
From: ATL
Default

the drawing shows air going into the ground... hows that work?

so in reality, the air is just being pressurized to go under the fin, thus lifting the fin, and the car(though I doubt its that effective to do much harm).

I suppose the idea is to move the air to the side, away from under the car, they dont seem to show that though. nor do I think it would accomplish it.

for the record though, the "proffesionals" opinion whom you trust is easily bought. hell I dont care if I hated the product, if you give me something for free, Ill love it.

also at 40-50mph, youd be real hard pressed to get any effect pos or neg from something like this, its not enough air flow.

sorry to rain on your parade, but it appears to be a tornado-ish product(you know the intake air swirler thingy), set up a pretty website, nice graphics, maybe an infomercial at 2AM, and OF COURSE scientific data to prove its value, along with a few professional indorsments.
Reply
Old Mar 17, 2004 | 06:37 AM
  #28  
Rayden2001's Avatar
Rayden2001
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,083
Likes: 0
From: IL
Default

It looks like its going to cause more drag than anything. I think most of us in here have coilovers or lowered springs on our zs so its not going to even be that much of an issue with the air traveling underneath a z. Since nissan has zero lift anyway on the z so way mess with it.
Reply
Old Mar 17, 2004 | 06:41 AM
  #29  
Rayden2001's Avatar
Rayden2001
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,083
Likes: 0
From: IL
Default

Originally posted by ares
the drawing shows air going into the ground... hows that work?

so in reality, the air is just being pressurized to go under the fin, thus lifting the fin, and the car(though I doubt its that effective to do much harm).

I suppose the idea is to move the air to the side, away from under the car, they dont seem to show that though. nor do I think it would accomplish it.

for the record though, the "proffesionals" opinion whom you trust is easily bought. hell I dont care if I hated the product, if you give me something for free, Ill love it.

also at 40-50mph, youd be real hard pressed to get any effect pos or neg from something like this, its not enough air flow.

sorry to rain on your parade, but it appears to be a tornado-ish product(you know the intake air swirler thingy), set up a pretty website, nice graphics, maybe an infomercial at 2AM, and OF COURSE scientific data to prove its value, along with a few professional indorsments.

You said it right.
Reply
Old Mar 18, 2004 | 12:01 PM
  #30  
Vlad's Avatar
Vlad
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 3,706
Likes: 1
From: Great Lakes
Default Re: Picture

Originally posted by AndyB
In action :
WOW! So now air is going to the ground and miraculously disappears there! Looks like a miracle, sounds like a miracle, must be a miracle.

I guess Tornado will go nice with this mod
http://www.tornadoair.com/index.php
There authors also achieved great results (2MPG fuel savings) by placing onstacle in path of flowing air

Also by using small kitchen exhaust fan in the airintake one can acieve far greater HP than all those turbochargers...
Reply
Old Mar 18, 2004 | 04:01 PM
  #31  
Haji's Avatar
Haji
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 165
Likes: 0
From: Tokyo
Default

Well, too bad nobody seems to believe what I'm saying.

But don't forget. Consumers aren't stupid.
If it is really meaninghless it would not sell this much.

Last edited by Haji; Mar 18, 2004 at 04:09 PM.
Reply
Old Mar 18, 2004 | 04:02 PM
  #32  
Haji's Avatar
Haji
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 165
Likes: 0
From: Tokyo
Default

Well, too bad nobody seems to believe what I'm saying.

But don't forget. Consumers aren't stupid.
If it is really meaninghless it would not sell this much.
Reply
Old Mar 18, 2004 | 04:09 PM
  #33  
zeroday's Avatar
zeroday
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,199
Likes: 0
From: .
Default

Originally posted by Haji
But don't forget. Consumers aren't stupid.
Reply
Old Mar 18, 2004 | 04:33 PM
  #34  
ether's Avatar
ether
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 694
Likes: 0
Default

anyways.. anybody got any new info on a rear diffuser, that's what I need right now more than anything
Reply
Old Mar 18, 2004 | 05:40 PM
  #35  
pinnacleliquid's Avatar
pinnacleliquid
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 413
Likes: 0
From: Anaheim, CA
Default VOODOO

IMHO
misapplied technology
Reply
Old Mar 18, 2004 | 07:28 PM
  #36  
islandsnow's Avatar
islandsnow
Registered User
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,008
Likes: 0
From: Torrance
Default

Was looking at the option mag ad for the product, what the product does is not push the air down into the ground, it diverts it away to the sides of the car. So as it pushes air to the sides, i guess there is less air pressure underneath since there is less air bouncing around the open pockets behind this device to create up force and drag. It says it starts to work from 50km/h on up.
Just reading the ad, not quite convinced yet, but would be amazed if this small device does what it says.

Last edited by islandsnow; Mar 18, 2004 at 07:33 PM.
Reply
Old Mar 18, 2004 | 07:39 PM
  #37  
reen's Avatar
reen
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 281
Likes: 0
From: SoCal
Default

Originally posted by islandsnow
Was looking at the option mag ad for the product, what the product does is not push the air down into the ground, it diverts it away from the open areas right behind it to the sides of the car. So as it pushes air to the sides, i guess there is less air pressure underneath since there is less air bouncing around the open pockets behind this device to create up force and drag. It says it starts to work from 50km/h on up.
Yes, that's what the ad says, but it's not the whole truth. The angled face would indeed direct the flow direction of some of the air towards the outside. However, the spoiler shape will also divert air over itself, down toward the ground. If anything, this thing creates more turbulence under the car -- the opposite of the smooth, laminar flow found under a flat-bottomed car.

Look at it this way -- you could have a perfectly smooth undercarriage with a proper diffuser at the rear, a front splitter, and a rear wing off a Chapparal, and you'd still be hard pressed to tell the difference at 50 km/h.
Reply
Old Mar 19, 2004 | 04:56 AM
  #38  
AndyB's Avatar
AndyB
New Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,389
Likes: 5
From: Connecticut
Default What!?!?!

Originally posted by Haji
Well, too bad nobody seems to believe what I'm saying.

But don't forget. Consumers aren't stupid.
If it is really meaninghless it would not sell this much.
Consumers aren't stupid?!?!?

How do you explain
Tornado
Slick 50
Gas line magnets
Miracle diet pills
Magnetic Q-Ray bracelets
Splitfire spark plugs

And yet... for EVERY SINGLE one of these products there are people and "professionals" who SWEAR they works. When they are tested they don't seem to work, but there are still people who swear they work even AFTER the tests show otherwise. That's when they start with "the test was flawed" or "you just don't get it".

The placebo effect is VERY powerfull and many people think _they_ are the one person on earth who is imune to it. They are mistaken.
Reply
Old Mar 19, 2004 | 04:59 AM
  #39  
AndyB's Avatar
AndyB
New Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,389
Likes: 5
From: Connecticut
Default sides

Originally posted by islandsnow
Was looking at the option mag ad for the product, what the product does is not push the air down into the ground, it diverts it away to the sides of the car. So as it pushes air to the sides, i guess there is less air pressure underneath since there is less air bouncing around the open pockets behind this device to create up force and drag. It says it starts to work from 50km/h on up.
Just reading the ad, not quite convinced yet, but would be amazed if this small device does what it says.
I agree, the "theory" is push the air to the sides.

The reality is that pushing air requires energy. That energy comes from increased drag. The air passing under the car probably does less harm if you let it flow under the car un-deflected. Deflecting it will cause drag and could increase the pressure in front of the deflector.

Increasing pressure in front of the deflector is OK for a chin spoiler since it is creating pressure that is not under the car trying to lift it. (and keeping that air from getting under the car). Once the air is under the car, putting something in it's path seems like a bad idea. I am picturing a snow plow blade under a truck instead of in front of it.

Just my $0.02
Reply
Old Mar 19, 2004 | 05:01 AM
  #40  
AndyB's Avatar
AndyB
New Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,389
Likes: 5
From: Connecticut
Default Butt dyno

Originally posted by reen
Look at it this way -- you could have a perfectly smooth undercarriage with a proper diffuser at the rear, a front splitter, and a rear wing off a Chapparal, and you'd still be hard pressed to tell the difference at 50 km/h.
That is a great description of why we are only measuring placebo effect here.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
XM 1
Engine & Drivetrain
29
Jul 10, 2022 07:44 AM
hulkout
370Z Brakes & Suspension
7
Apr 28, 2017 09:00 PM
Gruppe-S
Body Interior
13
May 16, 2016 10:42 PM
Extreme Dimensions
Southern California
0
Sep 24, 2015 03:35 PM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:27 PM.