Notices
Forced Induction Turbochargers and Superchargers..Got Boost?

New possible F/I product

Old Dec 6, 2004 | 06:32 AM
  #21  
BrianLG35C's Avatar
BrianLG35C
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,331
Likes: 0
From: NW Ohio
Default

Sounds very interesting! Would this be applicable to a G?
Reply
Old Dec 6, 2004 | 11:12 AM
  #22  
S12 driver's Avatar
S12 driver
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 498
Likes: 0
From: USA
Default

Originally posted by brex
Their existing R&D done on LS1 requires no intercooler since the piping back to engine intake is cooled down for being exposed. Testing shown 50% intercooler effiency was achieved by this design already.

Also, since no intercooler is required, the actual piping from the turbo to the engine is in fact the same if not less than car with front mount intercooler, hence greatly reducing the time needed to fill the piping..

V6P is also now working with another company out of NJ to R&D a small intercooler for either front or under car mounting. This small intercooler would compliment STS system very well, by further achieving 100% intercooler effiency while keeping the entire tubing short to reduce turbo lag.

Of course, all these talk are mainly based on their existing work done on domestics; how will imports work? No one knows until R&D is done. Which is why V6P and STS need your vote and showing interests so we may go forward with the R&D, and picking the car group that had shown most interests to go forward with first.

Thanks for your time.

Andy (aka Brex)
V6Performance.net Inc.
Thanks for the reply. But I think an IC will be required for the 350Z kit, and it will add to the overall volume that the turbo need to fill. Another thing that the conventional single turbo doesn't have is the cat restrictions prior to the turbo. The current conventional single turbo kit has no cats, the STS kit places the turbo after the cats, the cats will dramatically slow down and cool down the exhaust flow. Also the conventional single turbo kit use a BB turbo to reduce lag, does the STS kit include a ball bearing turbo?
Reply
Old Dec 6, 2004 | 12:29 PM
  #23  
bascelik's Avatar
bascelik
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 343
Likes: 0
From: Houston, TX
Default

By keeping boost restricted to 5psi (no, I don't consider methanol a viable solution to increasing boost), this kit should be on par with most of the SCs out there -- it will generate about same hp or less, but keep torque over a larger rpm range. Keep in mind, you'll be restricted in boost without an intercooler. Especially in hot climates.

Now, as far as cooling is concerned, why not go with water-to-air intercooler. With that much intake pipe, it should be very easy to add 2 heat exchangers -- one in front, one over the intake piping -- and run an electric pump to pump water across. As an optional, you could add built-in water spray cooler up front, to further provide temp reduction during power runs in hot weather. And, your overall intake piping would remain same length.
Reply
Old Dec 6, 2004 | 01:56 PM
  #24  
Gary Evans's Avatar
Gary Evans
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 100
Likes: 0
From: Mesa, Az
Default

For anyone who thinks you can install a turbocharger on the end of an exhaust system and have anything near comparable response/power to a system with the turbocharger mounted on the exhaust manifold I have a special offer for you.
Prime Oceanside property is available right her in Phoenix for a special low introductory price. More details will be made available as soon as you submit payment in full.
Reply
Old Dec 6, 2004 | 03:43 PM
  #25  
Enron Exec's Avatar
Enron Exec
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,756
Likes: 0
From: Houston
Default

Look at that dyno, they cut off everything before 4000 rpms. Are they tring to hide something you think?
Reply
Old Dec 6, 2004 | 04:54 PM
  #26  
Brandon@Forged's Avatar
Brandon@Forged
Sponsor
Forged Internals.com
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 5,566
Likes: 1
From: Valdosta, GA
Default

I'm just wondering if the flow rate is different towards the end of the exhaust compared to what the flow rate is right after the exhaust manifold. I would think this turbo system would lag more. It's good to see more options for the 350Z though.
Reply
Old Dec 6, 2004 | 05:10 PM
  #27  
brex's Avatar
brex
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
From: LA, CA
Default

Hi guys,

Thanks for all the input, especially S12 driver and bascelik. I will take your questions and suggestions to STS and I am sure they can answer them better than I am.

All in all, please remember this is a thread gauging interests. We're not asking you to put money down, nor is showing interest equal any form of commitment. Frankly, no one can gaurantee it will work perfectly right now - which is why a very intensive Research and Development is required on 350Z and G35.

However, business is a number game. Without knowing there is profit to be make, who wants to spend the precious money and r&d time? I am sure all of you want quality yet affordable products. This is your chance to push product toward that goal!! Please voice out if you're interested.

For few that is simply replying sarcastic comments, please leave and don't bother posting here. Either you have concerns, step up and address them so we all work toward a greater common goal; or don't bother us at all.

Andy (aka Brex)
V6Performance.net Inc.
Reply
Old Dec 6, 2004 | 05:23 PM
  #28  
brex's Avatar
brex
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
From: LA, CA
Default

Originally posted by BrianLG35C
Sounds very interesting! Would this be applicable to a G?
Yes. G35 is like 350Z that STS would like to R&D on. I had made same posting at G35driver.com to gather interests. If you're interested, please help out by spreading the word to other G35 drivers and point them to the V6P thread. With more people showing interest, the more likelyhood that STS will go forward with the project.

350Z and G35 owners are very fortunate that many FI options is already available. But there is nothing wrong to present more options, especially if we can achieve good performance result and good price.
Reply
Old Dec 7, 2004 | 02:24 AM
  #29  
Z BOY's Avatar
Z BOY
Registered User
iTrader: (41)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 5,264
Likes: 1
From: CA
Default

tried your site, but couldn't vote.
Reply
Old Dec 7, 2004 | 06:59 AM
  #30  
Hraesvelg's Avatar
Hraesvelg
Got Uranium?
Premier Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 35,723
Likes: 6
From: The Recliner of Rage
Default

Instead of an intercooler, why not desing the piping going from the turbo to the engine with cooling fins?
Reply
Old Dec 7, 2004 | 08:31 PM
  #31  
AParshall04's Avatar
AParshall04
Registered User
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 947
Likes: 0
From: San Diego, CA (From Sacto)
Default

If you need a 350z to test on in So Cal i might possibly consider being a Ginue pig (SP), shoot me a PM.
Reply
Old Dec 7, 2004 | 09:41 PM
  #32  
brex's Avatar
brex
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
From: LA, CA
Default

Actually, the company is in Utah.....
Reply
Old Dec 8, 2004 | 03:51 AM
  #33  
AParshall04's Avatar
AParshall04
Registered User
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 947
Likes: 0
From: San Diego, CA (From Sacto)
Default

oh i just saw LA on your name so assumed...heh
Reply
Old Dec 8, 2004 | 08:35 AM
  #34  
brex's Avatar
brex
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
From: LA, CA
Default

hehee.. I am on admin team with V6P, not affiliate with STS in any way. We met with STS during SEMA, and was attracted to their ease of installation, and unique-ness.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Workshop12
Exterior & Interior
256
Mar 23, 2020 01:45 PM
sales@czp
Engine
33
Sep 23, 2019 03:30 PM
EnjukuRacing
Engine
0
Sep 30, 2015 06:55 AM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:57 AM.