Notices
Forced Induction Turbochargers and Superchargers..Got Boost?

The 350z.Com APS Pizzing Contest

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 16, 2005 | 12:37 AM
  #21  
Brandon@Forged's Avatar
Brandon@Forged
Sponsor
Forged Internals.com
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 5,566
Likes: 1
From: Valdosta, GA
Default

Originally Posted by GurgenPB
First of all.... it's funny how we americans classify others as arognat, rude, crude, blunt, or any other synonyms. Come on guys, let's be a little objective and gain some perspective, ok. We are not very far off.

Second, Puz z, I am not sure what this means:
Not sure if oyu are discounting PE jsut for the sake of this argument or for any other reason. So PE is not even considered a kit, or what? But, that's water under the bridge...

Third, where are you getting this piece of information from? Do you know this for a fact? I mean, have you seen a PM or an email from Peter saying this? If so, then I will take your word for it for the purposes of this discussion and offer my apologies.

Just trying to stay objective. Was APS sincerely considered for an opportunity to be a sponsor? I heard different from a few sources.
If you really want the reasons behind the banning, you can PM me.

BTW, I think he/she was just saying that the first kit was GReddy and then came APS that had a complete solution. (GReddy-tuner kit, PE-slightly better tuner kit, a little more complete, APS-complete kit)
Old Jul 16, 2005 | 01:16 AM
  #22  
taurran's Avatar
taurran
Registered User
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 9,482
Likes: 0
From: .
Default

So what's the purpose of this post? All I see is another beating of the dead horse.

Anyway, first and foremost Peter is a salesman. He will give you the truth, but a sugar candy coated truth, when it comes to APS products.
Old Jul 16, 2005 | 01:30 AM
  #23  
Brandon@Forged's Avatar
Brandon@Forged
Sponsor
Forged Internals.com
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 5,566
Likes: 1
From: Valdosta, GA
Default

Originally Posted by taurran
So what's the purpose of this post? All I see is another beating of the dead horse.

Anyway, first and foremost Peter is a salesman. He will give you the truth, but a sugar candy coated truth, when it comes to APS products.
Rehashing of topics that have been resolved is against the rules as well.

I figured i'd give everyone a chance to reply to my replies before I close it though.
Old Jul 16, 2005 | 04:40 AM
  #24  
CESAROTORRES's Avatar
CESAROTORRES
Registered User
iTrader: (27)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,231
Likes: 0
From: Orlando Fl
Default

Originally Posted by Zcool
What part of "APS is not a vendor, it is a manufacturer" that you don't understand? It is the only manufacturer who has taken the time to answer questions about its product and for doing so they are criticized and banned. Very dumb move.
+1
Old Jul 16, 2005 | 05:52 AM
  #25  
Gman2004's Avatar
Gman2004
Registered User
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 4,328
Likes: 0
From: Miami, FL
Default

Originally Posted by kopfjaeger
>>ohhhh. are there any other manufacturers here that don't pay to play?

Uhh, yeah. Try turbonetics for one. Go to the search page, and look for all posts by users "turbonetics". Notice that his homepage on the user profile is turbonetics inc, and Brad doesn't conceal the fact he represents turbonetics. Wanna try to be a smart *** again?

uh, turbonetics is a site sponser. they paid their fees.
Old Jul 16, 2005 | 06:13 AM
  #26  
kopfjaeger's Avatar
kopfjaeger
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 64
Likes: 0
From: Raleigh, NC
Default

>>uh, turbonetics is a site sponser. they paid their fees.

They have been posting here a lot longer than that banner has bene at the top of the FI page. My point is that it may not be bad to let all manufacturers post without having to pay any fees (as long as they don't sell their product directly), and let all the vendors who are actually selling their product pay sponsorship fees.
Old Jul 16, 2005 | 06:16 AM
  #27  
Gman2004's Avatar
Gman2004
Registered User
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 4,328
Likes: 0
From: Miami, FL
Default

Originally Posted by kopfjaeger
>>uh, turbonetics is a site sponser. they paid their fees.

They have been posting here a lot longer than that banner has bene at the top of the FI page. My point is that it may not be bad to let all manufacturers post without having to pay any fees (as long as they don't sell their product directly), and let all the vendors who are actually selling their product pay sponsorship fees.

but before they paid their fees they never posted price or shipping dates like APS did all the time. In fact I've never seen turbonetics post price. I've only seen them post info about the product. There's a big difference between posting info and selling a product even though you can't buy direct from APS.
Old Jul 16, 2005 | 06:48 AM
  #28  
sentry65's Avatar
sentry65
the burninator
Premier Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 9,722
Likes: 2
From: phoenix, AZ
Default

I still don't see the "add to cart" button on APS's site, can someone tell me where it is please?

I know that they make turbo kits, but I still am not able to buy directly from them - therefore couldn't you say that they're not a vender?

All the sponsers are venders and as such them paying a fee are able to advertise on my350z.com to say "buy from us, click here"

I think it's awesome to have direct contact with Peter being a representative from that company. Of course they're going to promote their company, Peter doesn't come on this site to discuss "how fast have you gone in your Z???!!!" He's going to talk about turbo kits, and specifically how the APS kits work. If that's advertising, then wouldn't it be considered advertising if I was always talking about the specific mods I put on my car? Then all memebers should have to pay $150 a month if they're to even mention a manufacturer and discuss the details in how those parts work and effect performance etc.....

I think peter should never have been banned
IMO

and I think my350z is being a little greedy to ban him over a $150/month fee since we can't even buy from the "APS store"
IMO

Last edited by sentry65; Jul 16, 2005 at 06:52 AM.
Old Jul 16, 2005 | 07:06 AM
  #29  
Gman2004's Avatar
Gman2004
Registered User
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 4,328
Likes: 0
From: Miami, FL
Default

Originally Posted by sentry65
I still don't see the "add to cart" button on APS's site, can someone tell me where it is please?
But can't you see how he benefits from selling his product on here even though you can't buy directly from him? Also their are some sponsers on this site that don't sell APS products so he is directly competing with them. Now if Peter would only come on here and provide info instead promoting and selling his product that would be a different situation. For example SSR Engineering made a thread the other day about a new exhaust. All they did was give info about the product. Several people asked for the price and they still haven't posted it. Also they didn't post any links to their website. Do you understand now? Giving info and selling a product are two different things.

Originally Posted by APS
All the sponsers are venders and as such them paying a fee are able to advertise on my350z.com to say "buy from us, click here"
Not true. Turbonetics is a sponser and you can't buy from them either. I don't see a click here on their website.

Peter - as well as the guys at kinetix and stoptech are representatives from that company and I think it's awesome to have direct contact with them. Of course they're going to promote their company, Peter doesn't come on this site to discuss "how fast have you gone in your Z???!!!" He's going to talk about turbo kits, and specifically how the APS kits work.
The only problem with that is that he is was not only discussing but providing links to his website and refering people to his authorized APS vendors, some of which are not sponsers here.

If that's advertising, then wouldn't it be considered advertising if I was always talking about the specific mods I put on my car? Then all memebers should have to pay $150 a month if they're to even mention a manufacturer and discuss the details in how those parts work and effect performance etc.....
You have no monetary gain by promoting products on your car. Peter will gain by promoting APS.

I think peter should never have been banned IMO
Every one has a right to their own opinion.
Old Jul 16, 2005 | 07:23 AM
  #30  
sentry65's Avatar
sentry65
the burninator
Premier Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 9,722
Likes: 2
From: phoenix, AZ
Default

how can he possibly even remotely provide info about APS turbo kits without it being considered advertising?

I mean if I were him and I came on and said "our turbo kit includes a new oil pan and stock boost is 8 psi" - is that advertising or stating facts?

Also he does NOT compete with a vender who does not sell APS turbo kits. He is informing the consumer about his turbo kits. Someone like Sharif is in a unique position because he is a vender and he also knows turbo kits thru and thru and is able to counter Peter's posts with info about the Greddy kit.

Of course he's going to tell people where you can buy an APS kit - he's trying to answer people's questions. The consumer has to make up their mind what kit they want and Peter is providing some facts to the best of his ability.

If turbonetrics wants to pay that's their business. That doesn't mean it's right. It seems taboo to ban someone and block any links to a certain website as if it's forbidden. Some of us here want to know what Peter has to say and see what he's talking about. We all know Greddy's and Turbonetic's website too if we want info on those products.

I know him providing links to the APS site could maybe be seen as advertising, but there was only info on the website.

I guess I just think the whole thing is a shame

At least I can go to other forums and see what peter has to say

Last edited by sentry65; Jul 16, 2005 at 07:34 AM.
Old Jul 16, 2005 | 07:33 AM
  #31  
tonio's Avatar
tonio
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 549
Likes: 0
From: atlanta
Default

I'm neither here nor there on this issue but you guys mean to tell me if Jim Wolf himself joins this site to offer support but does not pay to be a sponsor you're going to ban him too?
Old Jul 16, 2005 | 07:45 AM
  #32  
sentry65's Avatar
sentry65
the burninator
Premier Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 9,722
Likes: 2
From: phoenix, AZ
Default

yeah, i'd have thought that'd be considered one of the draws to online car forums in general - the fact that there's free tech support provided by whoever wants to offer it

anyway, yeah some might call what he did advertising, I call it tech support and a "straight from the horses mouth info"

Last edited by sentry65; Jul 16, 2005 at 07:50 AM.
Old Jul 16, 2005 | 08:13 AM
  #33  
keeptrying's Avatar
keeptrying
Registered User
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 116
Likes: 0
From: San Diego
Default

No love loss here. Peter’s business ethics are atrocious.
Old Jul 16, 2005 | 09:21 AM
  #34  
dch760's Avatar
dch760
Registered User
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 48
Likes: 0
From: Fallbrook, Ca
Default

The thing that bothers me about this, is the limited information we are "allowed" to see in regards to APS. Sure I can go to the "other" site and get all the info I need but why should I have to resort to that? After all we are all here for that same purpose, no?....to find information and share our experiences with other 350Z owners and non-owners. Instead, because a manufacturer did not pay sponsor fees we are no longer allowed to view the information only they can provide. After all, who would know the APS kit better than APS?

Sure eventually the $$$ will turnaround to APS but they do not sell directly to the consumer. So in my understanding, because they tell you how much it costs and where you can get it they are now a vendor that MUST pay the monthly fee or else they get banned??? You can get this same info from their web site!!!

Although I will agree that they don't have the greatest business practices, and many times it seems like they are talking down to individuals, they still offer the best, out of the box, TT kit for our 350Z, and yet, I can only get "limited" information here on my350z.

I might have this all wrong but that's what I've gathered thus far.

Last edited by dch760; Jul 16, 2005 at 10:04 AM.
Old Jul 16, 2005 | 09:41 AM
  #35  
narkotic's Avatar
narkotic
New Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 986
Likes: 0
From: Orange County, CA
Default

Rewind...

All these lame *** politics..

What happened to the internet?
Old Jul 16, 2005 | 09:59 AM
  #36  
weslutes's Avatar
weslutes
Registered User
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 539
Likes: 1
From: huntington beach CA
Default

Intrnet used to be "the information highway"

Now it's a "information toll road"

J/K Please don't ban me, I love this site.
Old Jul 16, 2005 | 10:04 AM
  #37  
CESAROTORRES's Avatar
CESAROTORRES
Registered User
iTrader: (27)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,231
Likes: 0
From: Orlando Fl
Default

Originally Posted by weslutes
Intrnet used to be "the information highway"

Now it's a "information toll road"

J/K Please don't ban me, I love this site.
Old Jul 16, 2005 | 10:12 AM
  #38  
Z1 Performance's Avatar
Z1 Performance
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (564)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 19,266
Likes: 5
From: Long Island, New York
Default

Originally Posted by kopfjaeger
>>ohhhh. are there any other manufacturers here that don't pay to play?

Uhh, yeah. Try turbonetics for one. Go to the search page, and look for all posts by users "turbonetics". Notice that his homepage on the user profile is turbonetics inc, and Brad doesn't conceal the fact he represents turbonetics. Wanna try to be a smart *** again?
but turbonetics is a paid advertiser...
Old Jul 16, 2005 | 10:20 AM
  #39  
Z1 Performance's Avatar
Z1 Performance
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (564)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 19,266
Likes: 5
From: Long Island, New York
Default

I think it's the lack of dimplomacy that got them banned and nothing else. yes they are a manufacturer, and yes they derive a huge benefit from posting at will about their product...regardless if they sell it directly or not.

If they were able to limit the posts to technical discussions, rather that out and out product pushing, I think it would have been a different story, but that is my own personal view.

There are lots of vendors on here, or people who work for vendors and or manufacturers who are not, or are no longer paid sponsors (myself included). I have found the mods very very easy to work with, if you respect the boundries and follow the rules.

My own personal view on the sponsorship thing stems from a simple business analysis - what this site charges to be a vendor, relative to what other sites (that are more active and have greater membership levels) is about 2 x what it should be; simply too expensive - but that is a topic for another thread

adam
Old Jul 16, 2005 | 10:21 AM
  #40  
Z1 Performance's Avatar
Z1 Performance
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (564)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 19,266
Likes: 5
From: Long Island, New York
Default

Originally Posted by Z1 Performance
but turbonetics is a paid advertiser...

sorry about posting this...i replied before reading everyone else who said the same thing



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:51 AM.