Notices
Forced Induction Turbochargers and Superchargers..Got Boost?

Did a compresson test...Also, experts please take a look at these plugs!!!!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 22, 2005 | 03:38 PM
  #21  
GurgenPB's Avatar
GurgenPB
Thread Starter
UltimateSleeper
Premier Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,211
Likes: 1
From: Los Angeles, CA
Default

Originally Posted by 350zDCalb
how many times the ambient compression was compressed to get the given number at 5500ft altitude:

we'll do the following arithmitic in inches of mercury conversions (because Gurgen didn't know the psi numbers off hand) normal atmospheric pressure..drop of one inch of mercury for every thousand feet elevation...5.5 inches dropped....minus 29.92 (14.7psi)

29.92-5.5= 24.42 atmospheric pressure in inches of mercury at 5500ft

24.42/29.92 = percent of air at this altitude compared to sea level: .82%

given 82%... convert to psi

.82*14.7 = 12.0psi (this is the amount of atmpsoheric pressure at 5500ft altitude)


compression test here was in 130psi ballpark...to see what these numbers would have been at sea level: 130/12= 10.83 (compression ratio for compression testing purposes--not CR of piston)

14.7 * 10.83= 159.2 ---> that would be MY compression at sea level

leave the other variances to difference in piston to wall clearences, accuracy of the compression gauges, etc..

*** this entire math lesson was brought to you by a conversation with physics/math master Gurgen***

owe, my head hurts!
Or, more simply, next time jsut add 22.5% to your number (by multiplying your compression number by 1.225). Above is the long 'derivation' version.
Reply
Old Aug 23, 2005 | 12:13 PM
  #22  
350zDCalb's Avatar
350zDCalb
Sponsor
builtZmotors
iTrader: (21)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 2,780
Likes: 0
From: Albuquerque, NM
Default

Originally Posted by GurgenPB
Or, more simply, next time jsut add 22.5% to your number (by multiplying your compression number by 1.225). Above is the long 'derivation' version.

sure, but i wanted to explain how the figure was derived!
Reply
Old Aug 23, 2005 | 03:25 PM
  #23  
GurgenPB's Avatar
GurgenPB
Thread Starter
UltimateSleeper
Premier Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,211
Likes: 1
From: Los Angeles, CA
Default

Originally Posted by 350zDCalb
sure, but i wanted to explain how the figure was derived!
Yep.... I was jsut providing you with a shortcut for your own measurements in the future.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Lt_Ballzacki
Brakes & Suspension
39
Aug 6, 2021 06:19 AM
burglapfd
Maintenance & Repair
9
Dec 6, 2020 01:04 PM
350z82
Exterior & Interior
19
Oct 1, 2015 06:25 PM
hulkout
Tuning
1
Sep 30, 2015 12:33 PM
35reilly
Forced Induction
6
Sep 28, 2015 07:42 AM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:35 AM.