Kinetix SSV for FI
#1
Kinetix SSV for FI
I have had the SSV on my car for about a month. I just had my G retuned for the SSV. (I am running APS ST.)
Based on the dyno, the SSV has given me about 50 new ponies. Not a bad investment. Will try to post the dyno sheet later.
Based on the dyno, the SSV has given me about 50 new ponies. Not a bad investment. Will try to post the dyno sheet later.
#5
I knew everyone would doubt the claims. So I will post the dyno tonight.
Some of the ponies may have been from the tune, but, the tuner -- who did my APS ST and is the only person who has tuned my car -- did nothing more than tune the car for the SSV and even he was amazed by the increase.
Some of the ponies may have been from the tune, but, the tuner -- who did my APS ST and is the only person who has tuned my car -- did nothing more than tune the car for the SSV and even he was amazed by the increase.
#6
I knew everyone would doubt the claims. So I will post the dyno tonight.
Some of the ponies may have been from the tune, but, the tuner -- who did my APS ST and is the only person who has tuned my car -- did nothing more than tune the car for the SSV and even he was amazed by the increase.
FYI -- I was running a Kinetix V4 before the switch to the SSV. I have a borla exhaust with a custom adapter to the down pipe on the SSV.
Oh, forgot, went from 318 to 368.
Some of the ponies may have been from the tune, but, the tuner -- who did my APS ST and is the only person who has tuned my car -- did nothing more than tune the car for the SSV and even he was amazed by the increase.
FYI -- I was running a Kinetix V4 before the switch to the SSV. I have a borla exhaust with a custom adapter to the down pipe on the SSV.
Oh, forgot, went from 318 to 368.
#7
Originally Posted by Orlando333
I knew everyone would doubt the claims. So I will post the dyno tonight.
Some of the ponies may have been from the tune, but, the tuner -- who did my APS ST and is the only person who has tuned my car -- did nothing more than tune the car for the SSV and even he was amazed by the increase.
Some of the ponies may have been from the tune, but, the tuner -- who did my APS ST and is the only person who has tuned my car -- did nothing more than tune the car for the SSV and even he was amazed by the increase.
Last edited by Gman2004; 12-29-2005 at 12:23 PM.
Trending Topics
#8
Originally Posted by Orlando333
Oh, forgot, went from 318 to 368.
Last edited by Gman2004; 12-29-2005 at 12:24 PM.
#9
Gotcha. the dyno sheet I have has the original run with the V4.
I'll ask him if he did a base line dyno before the tune; he probably does and it is probably saved on the computer.
I'll ask him if he did a base line dyno before the tune; he probably does and it is probably saved on the computer.
#11
Yea, you probably should not, but when I asked Kinetix they said it would be okay. But I doubted their claim and ordered the SSV; didn't get the SSV until after the APS ST install and it several weeks before the SSV arrived.
I have had the V4 for over a year; no problems when running NA.
I have had the V4 for over a year; no problems when running NA.
#12
Originally Posted by Orlando333
I knew everyone would doubt the claims. So I will post the dyno tonight.
Some of the ponies may have been from the tune, but, the tuner -- who did my APS ST and is the only person who has tuned my car -- did nothing more than tune the car for the SSV and even he was amazed by the increase.
FYI -- I was running a Kinetix V4 before the switch to the SSV. I have a borla exhaust with a custom adapter to the down pipe on the SSV.
Oh, forgot, went from 318 to 368.
Some of the ponies may have been from the tune, but, the tuner -- who did my APS ST and is the only person who has tuned my car -- did nothing more than tune the car for the SSV and even he was amazed by the increase.
FYI -- I was running a Kinetix V4 before the switch to the SSV. I have a borla exhaust with a custom adapter to the down pipe on the SSV.
Oh, forgot, went from 318 to 368.
#13
There is no tappering. It is a conservative tune; if I want bigger numbers I am sure they could -- the tuner is APS authorized and they are working on the TT kit for car certification. I have no doubt that he can push my car to huge numbers, but I want the engine to last me a bit longer.
By the way, it is a 5AT.
By the way, it is a 5AT.
#15
Originally Posted by Orlando333
There is no tappering. It is a conservative tune; if I want bigger numbers I am sure they could -- the tuner is APS authorized and they are working on the TT kit for car certification. I have no doubt that he can push my car to huge numbers, but I want the engine to last me a bit longer.
By the way, it is a 5AT.
By the way, it is a 5AT.
Respect
JET
Last edited by JETPILOT; 12-29-2005 at 09:37 PM.
#16
the numbers are both after tune; I am trying to get the dyno before the tune with the SSV.
Jet -- You make alot of assumptions regarding what my out of pockets are for my mods and that I actually pay for my parts. Please keep that in mind.
Jet -- You make alot of assumptions regarding what my out of pockets are for my mods and that I actually pay for my parts. Please keep that in mind.
#17
Yeah that's a pretty unsafe assumtion that people pay for their mods.
The unsafe assumtion here is that you extracted 50HP from an intake when you have no before and after dyno runs with the intake being the only factor that changed.
Your claim has no scientific validity.
Respect
JET
The unsafe assumtion here is that you extracted 50HP from an intake when you have no before and after dyno runs with the intake being the only factor that changed.
Your claim has no scientific validity.
Respect
JET
#18
Nice numbers Orlando333! This has been some interesting reading! Having done the initial testing on the Kinetix IM (prototype) and then again on the Kinetix IM SSV prior to release and also like you having a V4 installed with my SC, I find your numbers credible.
Everything I did was initiated with a thread starting 4/10/2005. Skepticism about the numbers, criticism about SC tuning, tuning prior to doing dyno pulls with V4 and retuning prior to doing pulls with SSV. I would have been on a dyno forever had I tried to satisfy everyones comments. Again, NICE NUMBERS! Enjoy the additional RWHP and Torque!
Everything I did was initiated with a thread starting 4/10/2005. Skepticism about the numbers, criticism about SC tuning, tuning prior to doing dyno pulls with V4 and retuning prior to doing pulls with SSV. I would have been on a dyno forever had I tried to satisfy everyones comments. Again, NICE NUMBERS! Enjoy the additional RWHP and Torque!
#19
Originally Posted by SungNamZ
Nice numbers Orlando333! This has been some interesting reading! Having done the initial testing on the Kinetix IM (prototype) and then again on the Kinetix IM SSV prior to release and also like you having a V4 installed with my SC, I find your numbers credible.
Everything I did was initiated with a thread starting 4/10/2005. Skepticism about the numbers, criticism about SC tuning, tuning prior to doing dyno pulls with V4 and retuning prior to doing pulls with SSV. I would have been on a dyno forever had I tried to satisfy everyones comments. Again, NICE NUMBERS! Enjoy the additional RWHP and Torque!
Everything I did was initiated with a thread starting 4/10/2005. Skepticism about the numbers, criticism about SC tuning, tuning prior to doing dyno pulls with V4 and retuning prior to doing pulls with SSV. I would have been on a dyno forever had I tried to satisfy everyones comments. Again, NICE NUMBERS! Enjoy the additional RWHP and Torque!
#20
Sorry, I don't believe that 50 hp came from the SSV. I think the APS tall boy is as good of design as the SSV, yet FI owners are only seeing 15 hp more with it. This is not much more than a plenum spacer that is much less money.
Although the SSV allows you to keep the strut bar and looks cool. Yet, I will spend my money on the spacer and have more money for other mods.
Although the SSV allows you to keep the strut bar and looks cool. Yet, I will spend my money on the spacer and have more money for other mods.