Turbonetics DYNO!!!
01-21-2006, 06:30 PM
#41
I just got done swapping my buddy's manifold and TB in his car-been on that for a few hours, Im pretty tired, I still have to convert the video-make the movie, which is good quality BTW. I PROMISE Ill have dyno sheets and video of the pulls tomorrow...
01-21-2006, 06:33 PM
#42
Registered User
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: San Diego
Posts: 491
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Nice numbers man! Let's see some dyno sheets. What kind of dyno did you use?
My car was at T'netics recently and I pulled 354hp 341tq @8psi on a dyna pak. Supposedly reads 5-10%, which puts me in the ~370s.
Any plans to get the A/F richer? Good to hear you're car is up and pulling like no other.
My car was at T'netics recently and I pulled 354hp 341tq @8psi on a dyna pak. Supposedly reads 5-10%, which puts me in the ~370s.
Any plans to get the A/F richer? Good to hear you're car is up and pulling like no other.
01-21-2006, 07:04 PM
#43
Originally Posted by g35pm
Nice numbers man! Let's see some dyno sheets. What kind of dyno did you use?
My car was at T'netics recently and I pulled 354hp 341tq @8psi on a dyna pak. Supposedly reads 5-10%, which puts me in the ~370s.
Any plans to get the A/F richer? Good to hear you're car is up and pulling like no other.
My car was at T'netics recently and I pulled 354hp 341tq @8psi on a dyna pak. Supposedly reads 5-10%, which puts me in the ~370s.
Any plans to get the A/F richer? Good to hear you're car is up and pulling like no other.
I plan on contacting Reggie @ TN on Monday and see if I can get anotehr flash 1 point richer. You'll see the A/F when I post the dyno, its very smooth, just a tad leaner than I would like...
01-21-2006, 07:24 PM
#44
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: May 2002
Location: norcal
Posts: 2,059
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Alberto I was trying to find what ever happened with your problems and how/if you resolved them. I guess you did, but could you point me in the direction where I can read about it?
Thanks bro, & awesome #'s!!!
Thanks bro, & awesome #'s!!!
01-21-2006, 07:58 PM
#45
Originally Posted by throbbing_Zon
Alberto I was trying to find what ever happened with your problems and how/if you resolved them. I guess you did, but could you point me in the direction where I can read about it?
Thanks bro, & awesome #'s!!!
Thanks bro, & awesome #'s!!!
01-21-2006, 08:01 PM
#46
Here is the dyno scanned as promised guys. I printed it out on my comp at home, and for some reason it wont print the TQ peak even though I selected it and was displayed when I set it up to print. Again #'s are SAE corrected-0 smoothing. I made a video and Ill post a link to it as soon as its done finalizing Also I didnt even notice before the dyno seems to have been cut short. I told the dyno operator to stop at redline so I dont know why its a few hundred rpm shy of 6600...
Also I didnt even notice before the dyno seems to have been cut short. I told the dyno operator to stop at redline so I dont know why its a few hundred rpm shy of 6600...
01-21-2006, 09:14 PM
#49
Registered User
iTrader: (56)
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Miami
Posts: 1,894
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
First of all i didnt even know that he is running slicks in that case i would have said a quicker number.
Sorry if im not as knowledgeable as you are i think we all have to learn smart guy.
Sorry if im not as knowledgeable as you are i think we all have to learn smart guy.
Originally Posted by chimmike
the more I see you post, the more I realize how little you actually know about this stuff.
he pulled a 13.13 before turbo kit. He gets turbo kit, gets over 100whp more, and you think he'll only pull half a second better in the 1/4? Right.
I think he'll surprise us all and be in 11s.
he pulled a 13.13 before turbo kit. He gets turbo kit, gets over 100whp more, and you think he'll only pull half a second better in the 1/4? Right.
I think he'll surprise us all and be in 11s.
Last edited by Fairlady_z33; 01-21-2006 at 09:23 PM.
01-21-2006, 09:30 PM
#50
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Des Plaines, IL.
Posts: 537
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Alberto
Well, I just got back from my dyno, I was shocked to say the least. Mods are Turbonetics kit, JIC Full Titanium 80mm single exhaust, Crawford original "ugly" plenum, UR crank pulley, JWT clutch/fw. This was done on a dynojet, SAE corrected:
392whp, 391 ft/lbs!!
Pull was done in 5th gear....
I am very happy, except the dyno wideband verified what I knew from the WB Im a tad under 12:1 from midrange to redline-little leaner than what I would like. I believe the previous stock tune TN dyno record with mods was Laww's 390whp, I beat it by 2whp Im off to a local meet in a few, when I get back Ill post the sheets and the video....
392whp, 391 ft/lbs!!
Pull was done in 5th gear....I am very happy, except the dyno wideband verified what I knew from the WB Im a tad under 12:1 from midrange to redline-little leaner than what I would like. I believe the previous stock tune TN dyno record with mods was Laww's 390whp, I beat it by 2whp
Im off to a local meet in a few, when I get back Ill post the sheets and the video....My car made about 390WHP and 399ft/lbs and that was with cutting off at alittle over 5k rpm. I can't wait to see what you run at the track good luck.
01-22-2006, 06:06 AM
#51
Registered User
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: San Diego
Posts: 491
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Alberto
Like I said in my first post, dynojet SAE corrected numbers I plan on contacting Reggie @ TN on Monday and see if I can get anotehr flash 1 point richer. You'll see the A/F when I post the dyno, its very smooth, just a tad leaner than I would like...
I plan on contacting Reggie @ TN on Monday and see if I can get anotehr flash 1 point richer. You'll see the A/F when I post the dyno, its very smooth, just a tad leaner than I would like...
01-22-2006, 08:46 AM
#52
Originally Posted by DBZ33
My car made about 390WHP and 399ft/lbs and that was with cutting off at alittle over 5k rpm. I can't wait to see what you run at the track good luck.
01-22-2006, 09:16 AM
#53
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Escondido
Posts: 11,373
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Alberto
Nice results-except you cannot compare different dyno's to one another. Stock Z's here dyno 255-260whp on dynapacks, where I dyno'd 239whp on a dynojet stock. Ill have the video up shortly.
01-22-2006, 09:47 AM
#54
Here is the vid guys---> http://videos.streetfire.net/player....D-C3620B315196
MIA-its 12:1 on the dyno but on the street it runs a tad leaner, and thats too lean imo. I would love if it was 11:1....
MIA-its 12:1 on the dyno but on the street it runs a tad leaner, and thats too lean imo. I would love if it was 11:1....
01-22-2006, 10:29 AM
#55
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Escondido
Posts: 11,373
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Alberto
Here is the vid guys---> http://videos.streetfire.net/player....D-C3620B315196
MIA-its 12:1 on the dyno but on the street it runs a tad leaner, and thats too lean imo. I would love if it was 11:1....
MIA-its 12:1 on the dyno but on the street it runs a tad leaner, and thats too lean imo. I would love if it was 11:1....
Car sounds amazing BTW..
01-22-2006, 12:07 PM
#57
OGPremierMafia
iTrader: (16)
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Cincinnati OH
Posts: 5,106
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Alberto
Damn guys 12.2-12.5 Id drive my car into a wall if I ran that...I think you'll be surprised when I post some ST 1/4 times...
BTW the issue was the throttle body went bad....
BTW the issue was the throttle body went bad....
01-22-2006, 02:26 PM
#58
Registered User
iTrader: (7)
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Bradenton/Sarasota
Posts: 5,254
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Fairlady_z33
Sorry if im not as knowledgeable as you are i think we all have to learn smart guy.
it's as simple as this: If you're not 100% positive, beyond the shadow of a doubt, that what you're saying is factual or correct....or even educated guessing....don't post.
