Notices
Forced Induction Turbochargers and Superchargers..Got Boost?

How many power could support the cheapest forged internals?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 22, 2006 | 01:18 PM
  #1  
jiaimZ's Avatar
jiaimZ
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 81
Likes: 0
From: France
Default How many power could support the cheapest forged internals?

Just for us to know,

Wiseco 8.8:1 pistons cost near half of jE and arias (around 675$)

Eagle rods cost half of pauters and carrillo or crower rods (around 550$)


Which type of F/I engine could we make with those? (power; torque; reliability)
Cheap is good or bad in this case?
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2006 | 01:26 PM
  #2  
ReV2Red's Avatar
ReV2Red
I haz da turbos
Premier Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,621
Likes: 0
From: In the basement
Default

Dont take my word for it, but i think i heard of someone using eagle rods, that went **** up at around 550 rwhp. To be sure, i wouldn't go over 450-475 with cheap internals. Best invest in something better and have the peace of mind. If your gonna take the engine appart and do internals, you might aswell do it right.
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2006 | 01:30 PM
  #3  
1G-350Z's Avatar
1G-350Z
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 448
Likes: 0
From: Long Island
Default

Originally Posted by jiaimZ
Just for us to know,

Wiseco 8.8:1 pistons cost near half of jE and arias (around 675$)

Eagle rods cost half of pauters and carrillo or crower rods (around 550$)


Which type of F/I engine could we make with those? (power; torque; reliability)
Cheap is good or bad in this case?
If you are paying someone reputable to build your motor, add the cost of pulling and putting it back in. Tuning etc.. I would put in the best parts... Make it one shot. Choose the parts you think are the strongest. I've herd good things about Wiseco...
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2006 | 01:39 PM
  #4  
jiaimZ's Avatar
jiaimZ
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 81
Likes: 0
From: France
Default

power goal would be 450hp-475hp (on 93 octane ,98 in france) but with peace in mind instead versus stock internals(like someone are doing there )

i think 500hp+ not good for street use , roads in europe aren't straight as yours
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2006 | 01:52 PM
  #5  
JETPILOT's Avatar
JETPILOT
New Member
iTrader: (51)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 6,319
Likes: 2
From: Vero Beach, FL
Default

Your stock lower end would likely reliably handle 450rwhp as is. No need to build a motor until you blow up the one you have.

Respect
JET
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2006 | 01:53 PM
  #6  
jiaimZ's Avatar
jiaimZ
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 81
Likes: 0
From: France
Default

blowing one costs much more than building the first
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2006 | 02:01 PM
  #7  
JETPILOT's Avatar
JETPILOT
New Member
iTrader: (51)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 6,319
Likes: 2
From: Vero Beach, FL
Default

Building the first one is a waste of money if you didn't have a need for it in the first place.

Respect
JET
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2006 | 02:19 PM
  #8  
Sharif@Forged's Avatar
Sharif@Forged
Sponsor
Forged Performance
iTrader: (92)
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 13,733
Likes: 1
From: Marietta, GA
Default

When you tabulate the entire cost of building your motor, the difference between low end parts and high ends parts is minimal. Eagle rods can certainly hold 500whp, and probably much more. Pauter is the ultimate strength rod. For pistons, I have heard mixed reviews on Wiseco, so we dont carry them. FYI: Arias pistons are $760 on our website, with rings, wrist pins, and locks. So I wouldnt try to cut corners for $100.

But I would see no problem in going with Eagle rods and Arias pistons. Pauter is more applicable for those where funding is abundant, and/or, the 550whp+ club.
Link to Arias pistons: http://www.forgedinternals.com/store...cat=248&page=1
Link to Eagle Rods: http://www.forgedinternals.com/store/home.php?cat=249
Always in stock!
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2006 | 02:30 PM
  #9  
jiaimZ's Avatar
jiaimZ
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 81
Likes: 0
From: France
Default

What is 0.20 overbore for arias ?
We have to cut 0.2" in the liners to drop them in? doing this operation could be very expensive in france you know.

sorry for any comprehension mistake my english is poor..

Last edited by jiaimZ; Jan 22, 2006 at 02:36 PM.
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2006 | 02:36 PM
  #10  
Sharif@Forged's Avatar
Sharif@Forged
Sponsor
Forged Performance
iTrader: (92)
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 13,733
Likes: 1
From: Marietta, GA
Default

Originally Posted by jiaimZ
What is 0.20 overbore for arias ?
We have to cut 0.2" in the liners to drop them in?

sorry for any comprehension mistake my english is poor..
.020 of an inch (half of a milimeter), is removed, which is .25mm all the way around the cylinder. It's a very small amount of material. We always suggest oversized pistons, becuase each factory cylinder will be a slightly different size, and matching the cylinder to each piston, is the only way to ensure a proper piston to wall clearance, without variances between cylinders.
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2006 | 03:33 PM
  #11  
D350Z10's Avatar
D350Z10
New Member
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,218
Likes: 2
From: Michigan
Default

for that much power like Jet said no need to build you can easly handle 450 with a solid tune like many people here are.
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2006 | 06:15 PM
  #12  
plumpzz's Avatar
plumpzz
New Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 7,146
Likes: 0
From: Jersey, New
Default

Whats the poitn of using lower Comp pistons if you'll need more boost to begin with for the same power??
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2006 | 08:17 PM
  #13  
Zivman's Avatar
Zivman
New Member
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 7,179
Likes: 27
From: MPLS/ST.Paul MN
Default

I am running eagle rods in my car with arias 8.8:1 pistions. from the research I did, they should hold to near 600 whp. The 300Z boys run them pretty high.

my car is running a stock APS kit with upgraded actuators. no cams. I think I have maxed out the basic kit, no counting the actuators. the lower compression will hurt your power up top without more fuel than the stock APS supplied injectors can provide.

my car's specs

Last edited by Zivman; Jan 22, 2006 at 08:21 PM.
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2006 | 09:26 PM
  #14  
overZealous1's Avatar
overZealous1
Registered User
iTrader: (27)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 4,268
Likes: 1
From: tigard oregon
Default

Originally Posted by plumpzz
Whats the poitn of using lower Comp pistons if you'll need more boost to begin with for the same power??
the lower comp pistons just allow you to run alot more boost past the point where the stock 10.3-1 would detonate. it is a cylinder pressure/heat trade off. you will lose a little bottom end and throttle responce, but you will make up for it hugely with the amount of boost you can run on the top end.
Reply
Old Jan 23, 2006 | 12:52 AM
  #15  
mistaboosta's Avatar
mistaboosta
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 405
Likes: 0
From: Home
Default

the right question should be how long can those internals support the created power.
Reply
Old Jan 23, 2006 | 06:23 AM
  #16  
Zivman's Avatar
Zivman
New Member
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 7,179
Likes: 27
From: MPLS/ST.Paul MN
Default

Originally Posted by overZealous1
the lower comp pistons just allow you to run alot more boost past the point where the stock 10.3-1 would detonate. it is a cylinder pressure/heat trade off. you will lose a little bottom end and throttle responce, but you will make up for it hugely with the amount of boost you can run on the top end.
I noticed NO bottem end loss or throttle response loss. The tq I have down low is awesome and exceeds most curves I have seen. I expected some low end loss, but to my surprise, didn't see any:


Reply
Old Jan 23, 2006 | 06:52 AM
  #17  
Sharif@Forged's Avatar
Sharif@Forged
Sponsor
Forged Performance
iTrader: (92)
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 13,733
Likes: 1
From: Marietta, GA
Default

I havent see much meaningful differences between 8.5:1 pistons and 10.3:1 in terms of trq curves. Theoretically, 10.0:1 CR dropped to 9.0:1 results in a 3% power/trq loss, which is something you will not even feel.
Reply
Old Jan 23, 2006 | 08:13 AM
  #18  
trebien's Avatar
trebien
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 354
Likes: 0
From: ATX
Default

Originally Posted by Sharif@Forged
Theoretically, 10.0:1 CR dropped to 9.0:1 results in a 3% power/trq loss, which is something you will not even feel.

Oh, I disagree. There are plenty of reports from people on this board that can tell a 3%, or even 1% or 2% difference in power just from z-tubes, k&n filters, CAIs, exhausts, y-pipes, etc.

Reply
Old Jan 23, 2006 | 08:15 AM
  #19  
Zivman's Avatar
Zivman
New Member
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 7,179
Likes: 27
From: MPLS/ST.Paul MN
Default

Originally Posted by trebien
Oh, I disagree. There are plenty of reports from people on this board that can tell a 3%, or even 1% or 2% difference in power just from z-tubes, k&n filters, CAIs, exhausts, y-pipes, etc.

Got a good laugh out of that one
Reply
Old Jan 23, 2006 | 08:17 AM
  #20  
Sharif@Forged's Avatar
Sharif@Forged
Sponsor
Forged Performance
iTrader: (92)
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 13,733
Likes: 1
From: Marietta, GA
Default

Originally Posted by trebien
Oh, I disagree. There are plenty of reports from people on this board that can tell a 3%, or even 1% or 2% difference in power just from z-tubes, k&n filters, CAIs, exhausts, y-pipes, etc.

Then their butt dyno must be more accurate than a $50K load based dyno.

But seriously, oftentimes, people will feel power gains that arent even there, due to the increased noise that a CAI will generate.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:51 PM.