Which SuperCharger?
#42
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Panama, Central America
Posts: 965
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
1 Post
I think you're touching a very good poiint here. If it spins that much faster, it's going to create much more heat. Somehow that needs to be taken care of or you're going to see a lot of powerloss.
Danny
Danny
Originally Posted by wong hun xun
i cant comment on the intercooler.. i dont know if it will run a 20 minute roadcoarse in 100 degree weather..
moving on:
The Rotrex charger can be smaller than a vortech charger because is spins faster.
Vortech: 50,000rpm max
Rotrex: 120,000rpm max
moving on:
The Rotrex charger can be smaller than a vortech charger because is spins faster.
Vortech: 50,000rpm max
Rotrex: 120,000rpm max
#43
the burninator
iTrader: (11)
i'm willing to bet the rotrex can handle any extra heat and is designed for it. That actually makes me think its intake charge temps are going to be higher than on the vortech especially with a smaller intercooler.
Is the HKS louder than the vortech with spinning faster? Smaller faster fans are usually much louder than bigger slower fans that put out the same total CFM
Is the HKS louder than the vortech with spinning faster? Smaller faster fans are usually much louder than bigger slower fans that put out the same total CFM
#44
I ve got Stillen, stage 4, they use the EAton blower that comes on mercedes benz, on jaguars, it is the most reliable blower of all. The setup is also well balanced and leak free since the supercharger sits on the engine. the disadvantage is that you need a new hood. The sound is great. Power wise a bit less power than Vortech 5hp but also more torque (according to Zmagazine SC shootout). my friend here just had his vortech and the power is very similar (expect 100-120 hp extra at the wheels). we did not try against each other , i'll tell you when we do. but his setup seems fine i like it but not as solid or heavy duty as Stillen.
#45
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Panama, Central America
Posts: 965
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
1 Post
Originally Posted by sentry65
iThat actually makes me think its intake charge temps are going to be higher than on the vortech especially with a smaller intercooler.
Danny
#47
the burninator
iTrader: (11)
I did an area under the curve % of a 323whp stillen stage 3 vs a 350whp, 400whp, and 450whp vortech
I reached my % by filling in the area under the hp and tq curves seperately with black, then the empty space with white. I ran that block of data thru an average function to give me a grayscale % number of how much black (or area) is in that sampled area
I'll attach the dyno charts I used - there is some slight error just from these being different cars on different dynos at different locations, temps, humidity, elevation etc, but ballpark-wise should be reasonably accurate.
The first picture just shows what I mean with the area filled in for stillen hp, tq, then 350whp vortech hp, tq, 400whp vortech hp, tq, 450whp vortech hp, tq
2nd picture is 323whp stillen stage 3 vs 400whp vortech
3rd picture is 323whp stillen stage 3 vs 450whp vortech
4th picture is 323whp stillen stage 3 vs 350whp vortech
some of those pictures I traced over and changed the color so you can see it better since most dynos show red and blue lines it starts getting hard to read with multiple dynos
Dynosheets don't ever plot out anything below 2000 rpms, but if it did and that data was factored in, the stillen would fair just ever so slightly better in some of the lower rpm percents
IMO people interested in going WOT should mostly pay attention to hp on these since hp takes tq and factors in engine rpm speed - hence why you shift up high near redline.
Torque is more useful for daily driving people to pay attention to since that's what gives you the oomph and good throttle response
then I averaged the numbers. People looking for a 50/50 mix of daily driving and WOT should maybe pay attention to that the most
2200-redline
323whp
stillen hp = 51%
stillen tq = 60%
avg = 55.5%
350whp
vortech hp = 52%
vortech tq = 60%
avg = 56%
400whp
vortech hp = 56%
vortech tq = 65%
avg = 60.5%
450whp
vortech hp = 67%
vortech tq = 75%
avg = 71%
2200-5500 rpms
323whp
stillen hp = 45%
stillen tq = 61%
avg = 53%
350whp
vortech hp = 45%
vortech tq = 58%
avg = 51.5%
400whp
vortech hp = 48%
vortech tq = 63%
avg = 55.5%
450whp
vortech hp = 58%
vortech tq = 73%
avg = 65.5%
2200-4000 rpms
323whp
stillen hp = 36%
stillen tq = 60%
avg = 48%
350whp
vortech hp = 33%
vortech tq = 53%
avg = 43%
400whp
vortech hp = 35%
vortech tq = 58%
avg = 46.5
450whp
vortech hp = 44%
vortech tq = 66%
avg = 55%
2200-3000 rpms
323whp
stillen hp = 31%
stillen tq = 59%
avg = 45%
350whp
vortech hp = 27%
vortech tq = 50%
avg = 38.5%
400whp
vortech hp = 29%
vortech tq = 55%
avg = 42%
450whp
vortech hp = 37%
vortech tq = 60%
avg = 48.5%
3500-5000 rpms (midrange)
323whp
stillen hp = 50%
stillen tq = 61%
avg = 55.5%
350whp
vortech hp = 51%
vortech tq = 62%
avg = 56.5%
400whp
vortech hp = 54%
vortech tq = 66%
avg = 60%
450whp
vortech hp = 65%
vortech tq = 78%
avg = 71.5%
4300-redline WOT range (gears 1-3)
323whp
stillen hp = 71%
stillen tq = 68%
avg = 69.5%
350whp
vortech hp = 75%
vortech tq = 73%
avg = 74%
400whp
vortech hp = 80%
vortech tq = 78%
avg = 79%
450whp
vortech hp = 88%
vortech tq = 87%
avg = 87.5%
5000-redline WOT range (gears 4-6)
323whp
stillen hp = 65%
stillen tq = 59%
avg = 62%
350whp
vortech hp = 71%
vortech tq = 65%
avg = 68%
400whp
vortech hp = 78%
vortech tq = 71%
avg = 74.5%
450whp
vortech hp = 90%
vortech tq = 82%
avg = 86%
I reached my % by filling in the area under the hp and tq curves seperately with black, then the empty space with white. I ran that block of data thru an average function to give me a grayscale % number of how much black (or area) is in that sampled area
I'll attach the dyno charts I used - there is some slight error just from these being different cars on different dynos at different locations, temps, humidity, elevation etc, but ballpark-wise should be reasonably accurate.
The first picture just shows what I mean with the area filled in for stillen hp, tq, then 350whp vortech hp, tq, 400whp vortech hp, tq, 450whp vortech hp, tq
2nd picture is 323whp stillen stage 3 vs 400whp vortech
3rd picture is 323whp stillen stage 3 vs 450whp vortech
4th picture is 323whp stillen stage 3 vs 350whp vortech
some of those pictures I traced over and changed the color so you can see it better since most dynos show red and blue lines it starts getting hard to read with multiple dynos
Dynosheets don't ever plot out anything below 2000 rpms, but if it did and that data was factored in, the stillen would fair just ever so slightly better in some of the lower rpm percents
IMO people interested in going WOT should mostly pay attention to hp on these since hp takes tq and factors in engine rpm speed - hence why you shift up high near redline.
Torque is more useful for daily driving people to pay attention to since that's what gives you the oomph and good throttle response
then I averaged the numbers. People looking for a 50/50 mix of daily driving and WOT should maybe pay attention to that the most
2200-redline
323whp
stillen hp = 51%
stillen tq = 60%
avg = 55.5%
350whp
vortech hp = 52%
vortech tq = 60%
avg = 56%
400whp
vortech hp = 56%
vortech tq = 65%
avg = 60.5%
450whp
vortech hp = 67%
vortech tq = 75%
avg = 71%
2200-5500 rpms
323whp
stillen hp = 45%
stillen tq = 61%
avg = 53%
350whp
vortech hp = 45%
vortech tq = 58%
avg = 51.5%
400whp
vortech hp = 48%
vortech tq = 63%
avg = 55.5%
450whp
vortech hp = 58%
vortech tq = 73%
avg = 65.5%
2200-4000 rpms
323whp
stillen hp = 36%
stillen tq = 60%
avg = 48%
350whp
vortech hp = 33%
vortech tq = 53%
avg = 43%
400whp
vortech hp = 35%
vortech tq = 58%
avg = 46.5
450whp
vortech hp = 44%
vortech tq = 66%
avg = 55%
2200-3000 rpms
323whp
stillen hp = 31%
stillen tq = 59%
avg = 45%
350whp
vortech hp = 27%
vortech tq = 50%
avg = 38.5%
400whp
vortech hp = 29%
vortech tq = 55%
avg = 42%
450whp
vortech hp = 37%
vortech tq = 60%
avg = 48.5%
3500-5000 rpms (midrange)
323whp
stillen hp = 50%
stillen tq = 61%
avg = 55.5%
350whp
vortech hp = 51%
vortech tq = 62%
avg = 56.5%
400whp
vortech hp = 54%
vortech tq = 66%
avg = 60%
450whp
vortech hp = 65%
vortech tq = 78%
avg = 71.5%
4300-redline WOT range (gears 1-3)
323whp
stillen hp = 71%
stillen tq = 68%
avg = 69.5%
350whp
vortech hp = 75%
vortech tq = 73%
avg = 74%
400whp
vortech hp = 80%
vortech tq = 78%
avg = 79%
450whp
vortech hp = 88%
vortech tq = 87%
avg = 87.5%
5000-redline WOT range (gears 4-6)
323whp
stillen hp = 65%
stillen tq = 59%
avg = 62%
350whp
vortech hp = 71%
vortech tq = 65%
avg = 68%
400whp
vortech hp = 78%
vortech tq = 71%
avg = 74.5%
450whp
vortech hp = 90%
vortech tq = 82%
avg = 86%
Last edited by sentry65; 04-21-2006 at 12:02 PM.
#48
nice study sentry 65 , i am glad you did it because i can even confirm it. i did not race my friends Vortech (who has probably similar hp since similar boost) because he is still braeking in his clutch. but we did step on it a bit while rolling at 5th gear with low rpm (2000-3000) , and my car was clearly more responsive and jumped ahead . when he is over his breaking in i'll tell you the result. I did not dyno yet because the dyno place next to me is crap.
i have to find another one. I run on 98 octane and stage 4 must give around 20-30 more hp than my previous stage 3 because it gives around 1psi more boost, anyways i felt clearly the difference and my 80-120Km/h 4th gear test improved by a consistant 0.2-03 sec . My estimates would be anywhere in the 350-360 whp range.
i have to find another one. I run on 98 octane and stage 4 must give around 20-30 more hp than my previous stage 3 because it gives around 1psi more boost, anyways i felt clearly the difference and my 80-120Km/h 4th gear test improved by a consistant 0.2-03 sec . My estimates would be anywhere in the 350-360 whp range.
Last edited by Dr.G; 04-21-2006 at 12:48 PM.
#49
Registered User
iTrader: (6)
Originally Posted by wong hun xun
LOL.. guess you can keep thinking that "peak" hp number is a real performance measure.
I compared dyno charts and a 330hp HKS kit is putting out MORE AVERAGE power than a 408hp Vortech.
Besides. You can just change the pulley on the HKS, retune and be at 400whp. (yes.. it has been done)
I compared dyno charts and a 330hp HKS kit is putting out MORE AVERAGE power than a 408hp Vortech.
Besides. You can just change the pulley on the HKS, retune and be at 400whp. (yes.. it has been done)
#50
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Panama, Central America
Posts: 965
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
1 Post
Originally Posted by Dr.G
and stage 4 must give around 20-30 more hp than my previous stage 3 because it gives around 1psi more boost,
Danny
#51
Registered User
iTrader: (6)
Originally Posted by wong hun xun
LOL.. guess you can keep thinking that "peak" hp number is a real performance measure.
I compared dyno charts and a 330hp HKS kit is putting out MORE AVERAGE power than a 408hp Vortech.
Besides. You can just change the pulley on the HKS, retune and be at 400whp. (yes.. it has been done)
I compared dyno charts and a 330hp HKS kit is putting out MORE AVERAGE power than a 408hp Vortech.
Besides. You can just change the pulley on the HKS, retune and be at 400whp. (yes.. it has been done)
#52
Registered User
iTrader: (6)
Originally Posted by dscheers
How do you come up with those numbers? Rule of thumb: 5 to 7% of base per added psi. Base of a Z is about 240hp, so 1 psi more would be like max. 17 HP more...
Danny
Danny
I forgot to add that the 14.7psi to double the whp , is if only no other factors come into play . Like a restrictive exhaust , IC that is to small , and thing of that sort
Last edited by booger; 04-21-2006 at 01:19 PM.
#53
Originally Posted by dscheers
How do you come up with those numbers? Rule of thumb: 5 to 7% of base per added psi. Base of a Z is about 240hp, so 1 psi more would be like max. 17 HP more...
Danny
Danny
so with 7psi boost (if base is 240 ) you get 354 hp
with 8 psi you get 370+ so this is where your rule came from
i said approx 1psi , in fact it is more maybe 1.2 psi i could not measure it because my gauge is in bars and the differences in the subdivisions in the gauge are too close.
7psi is 0.476 bars and 8 psi 0.54, 8.2 psi is 0.55 so not much difference on the gauge
Last edited by Dr.G; 04-21-2006 at 01:29 PM.
#54
the burninator
iTrader: (11)
I don't know, but there's just so many factors with everything.
an open exhaust makes the psi go down, but the power increases. So for example is an open exhaust with 6psi better than a closed exhaust with 8psi? They're just different with usually trading off some low tq for more hp up high
as far as who is faster from one setup than another, there's just so many other things other than tq and hp numbers - yeah there's area under the curve, but what rpm range you drive in, what gearing, curb weight, rotational mass, ability for the rear springs to let the weight transfer to the rear, the weight distribution, traction, center of gravity, handling, driver skill, ability to launch, etc etc.
All of us have pretty decently fast cars as is
an open exhaust makes the psi go down, but the power increases. So for example is an open exhaust with 6psi better than a closed exhaust with 8psi? They're just different with usually trading off some low tq for more hp up high
as far as who is faster from one setup than another, there's just so many other things other than tq and hp numbers - yeah there's area under the curve, but what rpm range you drive in, what gearing, curb weight, rotational mass, ability for the rear springs to let the weight transfer to the rear, the weight distribution, traction, center of gravity, handling, driver skill, ability to launch, etc etc.
All of us have pretty decently fast cars as is
Last edited by sentry65; 04-21-2006 at 01:53 PM.
#55
Originally Posted by sentry65
I don't know, but there's just so many factors with everything.
an open exhaust makes the psi go down, but the power increases. So for example is an open exhaust with 6psi better than a closed exhaust with 8psi? They're just different with usually trading off some low tq for more hp up high
as far as who is faster from one setup than another, there's just so many other things other than tq and hp numbers - yeah there's area under the curve, but what rpm range you drive in, what gearing, curb weight, rotational mass, ability for the rear springs to let the weight transfer to the rear, the weight distribution, traction, driver skill, ability to launch, etc etc.
All of us have pretty decently fast cars as is
an open exhaust makes the psi go down, but the power increases. So for example is an open exhaust with 6psi better than a closed exhaust with 8psi? They're just different with usually trading off some low tq for more hp up high
as far as who is faster from one setup than another, there's just so many other things other than tq and hp numbers - yeah there's area under the curve, but what rpm range you drive in, what gearing, curb weight, rotational mass, ability for the rear springs to let the weight transfer to the rear, the weight distribution, traction, driver skill, ability to launch, etc etc.
All of us have pretty decently fast cars as is
#56
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Panama, Central America
Posts: 965
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
1 Post
Originally Posted by Dr.G
the approximation is this: base power x(boost +14.7)/14.7
so with 7psi boost (if base is 240 ) you get 354 hp
with 8 psi you get 370+ so this is where your rule came from
i said approx 1psi , in fact it is more maybe 1.2 psi i could not measure it because my gauge is in bars and the differences in the subdivisions in the gauge are too close.
7psi is 0.476 bars and 8 psi 0.54, 8.2 psi is 0.55 so not much difference on the gauge
so with 7psi boost (if base is 240 ) you get 354 hp
with 8 psi you get 370+ so this is where your rule came from
i said approx 1psi , in fact it is more maybe 1.2 psi i could not measure it because my gauge is in bars and the differences in the subdivisions in the gauge are too close.
7psi is 0.476 bars and 8 psi 0.54, 8.2 psi is 0.55 so not much difference on the gauge
Even 1.2psi more will create max. 20hp more, no way it will give 30hp more.
Danny