VQ35 Solid Motor Mounts
#61
Originally Posted by InjectedPerf
Both of you have your opinion and I appreciate it. If you think $300 is overpriced then you can believe that. We have sold dozens upon dozens of solid motor mounts for Supras with no one saying one word about it. And this is at the exact same price. These are not overpriced in our opinion and we don't expect to sell them to everyone. Same with the Magnetti Marreli and L19 ARP head studs we have developed and produced. These aren't for everyone and those that understand it will want it. Plain and simple.
Originally Posted by InjectedPerf
Paying more for nothing? These are completely different then SVRs. If you don't see that, then this is a pointless conversation. If you can have them made for less than $200 then why are you even questioning my product and have it done locally?
Futhermore I'd like to state that I think solid motor mounts are all together a bad idea. You made a statement earlier "I don't believe in using a bolt size other than what Nissan has spent millions of dollars they designed for their cars." How about we expand on that just a bit... Please can you tell our member why Nissan Engineers would spend more money developing rubber motor mounts in our cars if they could have spent far less making solid mounts in the first place? Hell... They could have just bolted the motor directly to the frame if they wanted to come to think of it. Yeah... I suppose they could have done that huh? Why you suppose they didn't?
Please... Can you tell me why NISMO makes their motors from harder rubber or urathane and not from solid metal? I guess their a bunch of idiots too huh? Did you know that motor mounts in todays cars serve other purposes other than "holding the engine up"? They serve as a very important safety feature designed to allow the motor to break away in a frontend impact. It would be a shame to know you where overcharging for a part that might end up costing someone their life huh? I hope you've attached a nice little disclaimer with the sale of evey one of these so called motor mounts you've sold. Just a thought.
Here's another little bit of information I'm gonna share witcha... The same "shock energy" from the motor that you're trying to isolate with your motor mounts is going to go somewhere... perhaps you'll sell an expensive fix for that to. Again... This is just the opinion of a lowly consumer. Don't mind me a bit.
You hate me now huh?
Last edited by Havok_RLS2; 06-05-2006 at 07:38 AM.
#62
so i take it you don't think the force of a crash would sheer the bolt stud on the solid motor mounts or break the mount from the body?
I suppose intercoolers and turbos are hurting crash tests as well
I suppose intercoolers and turbos are hurting crash tests as well
Last edited by sentry65; 06-05-2006 at 07:50 AM.
#63
Thread Starter
Sponsor
Injected Performance
Injected Performance
iTrader: (15)
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 636
Likes: 0
From: Houston
Supra owners are not as smart as Z owners? Come on that is a rediculous statement. I am not taking advantage of anyone. These cost us well more than $20 to make and well more than the other ones on the market. Why do I sell them for the same as the Supra ones? Because they cost the same to produce. They are the same design just altered to fit the Nissan 350z. Nissan motor mounts use rubber bushings as they are intended for a comfortable ride with 287hp and 274ft/lbs of torque. Go make 780rwhp and you will see how much the stock motor rotates towards the passenger shock tower. I understand you do not like our motor mounts. It is amusing that you don't say the same as the other mounts on the market Other mounts require the bolt to go through the bottom of the mount. If the top nut loosens and comes off, where does the motor go? You are attacking me personally at this point and not our product. Your statements have been expressed and I don't think there is much else for you to say.
No, I don't hate you. I think your attacks at me personally are a bit far. I would like everyone to understand the pros and cons for a solid motor mount as it is not intended for everyone. I am never here to take advantage of any customer. You can ask anyone that I have done business with in the past. These mounts cost us a lot of money to produce, more so then others, so they have a higher price. I am not getting rich off this design or anything else we are producing and selling.
No, I don't hate you. I think your attacks at me personally are a bit far. I would like everyone to understand the pros and cons for a solid motor mount as it is not intended for everyone. I am never here to take advantage of any customer. You can ask anyone that I have done business with in the past. These mounts cost us a lot of money to produce, more so then others, so they have a higher price. I am not getting rich off this design or anything else we are producing and selling.
Originally Posted by Havok_RLS2
So what you're saying is, Supras owners aren't as smart as Z owners huh? Second question... Why would you charge the same price on a motor mounts that are entirely different from the Supra mounts? It's because you can right?
Because there is NOTHING I HATE MORE than a company that slaps $20 worth of parts together and tries to sell it to that public for a million dollars. It's like your taking advantage of the same people you're claiming to support. To me it's unethical and shameful.
Futhermore I'd like to state that I think solid motor mounts are all together a bad idea. You made a statement earlier "I don't believe in using a bolt size other than what Nissan has spent millions of dollars they designed for their cars." How about we expand on that just a bit... Please can you tell our member why Nissan Engineers would spend more money developing rubber motor mounts in our cars if they could have spent far less making solid mounts in the first place? Hell... They could have just bolted the motor directly to the frame if they wanted to come to think of it. Yeah... I suppose they could have done that huh? Why you suppose they didn't?
Please... Can you tell me why NISMO makes their motors from harder rubber or urathane and not from solid metal? I guess their a bunch of idiots too huh? Did you know that motor mounts in todays cars serve other purposes other than "holding the engine up"? They serve as a very important safety feature designed to allow the motor to break away in a frontend impact. It would be a shame to know you where overcharging for a part that might end up costing someone their life huh? I hope you've attached a nice little disclaimer with the sale of evey one of these so called motor mounts you've sold. Just a thought.
Here's another little bit of information I'm gonna share witcha... The same "shock energy" from the motor that you're trying to isolate with your motor mounts is going to go somewhere... perhaps you'll sell an expensive fix for that to. Again... This is just the opinion of a lowly consumer. Don't mind me a bit.
Because there is NOTHING I HATE MORE than a company that slaps $20 worth of parts together and tries to sell it to that public for a million dollars. It's like your taking advantage of the same people you're claiming to support. To me it's unethical and shameful.
Futhermore I'd like to state that I think solid motor mounts are all together a bad idea. You made a statement earlier "I don't believe in using a bolt size other than what Nissan has spent millions of dollars they designed for their cars." How about we expand on that just a bit... Please can you tell our member why Nissan Engineers would spend more money developing rubber motor mounts in our cars if they could have spent far less making solid mounts in the first place? Hell... They could have just bolted the motor directly to the frame if they wanted to come to think of it. Yeah... I suppose they could have done that huh? Why you suppose they didn't?
Please... Can you tell me why NISMO makes their motors from harder rubber or urathane and not from solid metal? I guess their a bunch of idiots too huh? Did you know that motor mounts in todays cars serve other purposes other than "holding the engine up"? They serve as a very important safety feature designed to allow the motor to break away in a frontend impact. It would be a shame to know you where overcharging for a part that might end up costing someone their life huh? I hope you've attached a nice little disclaimer with the sale of evey one of these so called motor mounts you've sold. Just a thought.
Here's another little bit of information I'm gonna share witcha... The same "shock energy" from the motor that you're trying to isolate with your motor mounts is going to go somewhere... perhaps you'll sell an expensive fix for that to. Again... This is just the opinion of a lowly consumer. Don't mind me a bit.
Last edited by InjectedPerf; 06-05-2006 at 07:54 AM.
#65
Originally Posted by sentry65
so i take it you don't think the force of a crash would sheer the bolt stud on the solid motor mounts or break the mount from the body?
I suppose intercoolers and turbos are hurting crash tests as well
I suppose intercoolers and turbos are hurting crash tests as well
#66
yeah the bickering over quality etc is getting old
let the consumer make the choice. Glad there's another option, and hope whoever buys them thinks they're worth the price
everyone kinda skipped over my engine balance question/comments/theory and kept bickering instead
the crashtesting is something new I've never considered with solid motor mounts. I tend to think the engine would bend backwards twisting on the engine mounting points if one side doesn't sheer off. It probably is less safe than the stock rubber ones, but I don't think it's a show stopper issue. I mean there's guys removing their airbags and using 4 pt harnesses on the street on unapproved harness bars. Or guys putting in carbon doors with roll cages on the street.
let the consumer make the choice. Glad there's another option, and hope whoever buys them thinks they're worth the price
everyone kinda skipped over my engine balance question/comments/theory and kept bickering instead
the crashtesting is something new I've never considered with solid motor mounts. I tend to think the engine would bend backwards twisting on the engine mounting points if one side doesn't sheer off. It probably is less safe than the stock rubber ones, but I don't think it's a show stopper issue. I mean there's guys removing their airbags and using 4 pt harnesses on the street on unapproved harness bars. Or guys putting in carbon doors with roll cages on the street.
Last edited by sentry65; 06-05-2006 at 08:02 AM.
#68
Originally Posted by Havok_RLS2
Comon Sentry... I know you understand what I'm talking about. Chances are it would but would you want to take that chance?
i think you brought up a good point, but I already took the chance since I have SVR mounts on my car and have been extremely happy with them
some people think the mounts would punch a hole in the aluminum engine block in an impact
#69
Thread Starter
Sponsor
Injected Performance
Injected Performance
iTrader: (15)
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 636
Likes: 0
From: Houston
As far as engine balancing goes, race cars (mostly drag cars from my experience) use solid motor mounts. Engine dynos use solid motor mounts. I understand you theory on rubber mounts taking the cushion but don't think a solid motor mount would cause more wear on the internals of an engine. Just my thoughts.
Originally Posted by sentry65
yeah the bickering over quality etc is getting old
let the consumer make the choice. Glad there's another option, and hope whoever buys them thinks they're worth the price
everyone kinda skipped over my engine balance question/comments/theory and kept bickering instead
the crashtesting is something new I've never considered with solid motor mounts. I tend to think the engine would bend backwards twisting on the engine mounting points if one side doesn't sheer off. It probably is less safe than the stock rubber ones, but I don't think it's a show stopper issue. I mean there's guys removing their airbags and using 4 pt harnesses on the street on unapproved harness bars. Or guys putting in carbon doors with roll cages on the street.
let the consumer make the choice. Glad there's another option, and hope whoever buys them thinks they're worth the price
everyone kinda skipped over my engine balance question/comments/theory and kept bickering instead
the crashtesting is something new I've never considered with solid motor mounts. I tend to think the engine would bend backwards twisting on the engine mounting points if one side doesn't sheer off. It probably is less safe than the stock rubber ones, but I don't think it's a show stopper issue. I mean there's guys removing their airbags and using 4 pt harnesses on the street on unapproved harness bars. Or guys putting in carbon doors with roll cages on the street.
#71
Originally Posted by sentry65
i think you brought up a good point, but I already took the chance since I have SVR mounts on my car and have been extremely happy with them
some people think the mounts would punch a hole in the aluminum engine block in an impact
some people think the mounts would punch a hole in the aluminum engine block in an impact
The Nissan Engineers and designers did infact do a lot of crash testing on our cars. There were some benifits that came out of it. taks for instants the carbon fiber drive shaft that comes stock on all our cars. It was designed to shatter in a front end impact allowing the motor to break away from the motor mounts thus allowing the motor to drop out of the bottom of the car. While that CF drive shaft (due to it's lighter weight) give some performace benefits it was put there with safety in mind first.
I believe that the motor mount design are just as important as a seatbelt or an airbag in that case. It was designed to serve multiple functions to a greater good.
#72
Originally Posted by XBS
One question for both of you, Why not use polyutrethane between the bolt and the support on both sides for less vibration, it would still not allow the motor flex or move right?
Just getting some opinions before I install mine. Would the use of polyurethane be a bad idea?
-George
Just getting some opinions before I install mine. Would the use of polyurethane be a bad idea?
-George
#73
Originally Posted by InjectedPerf
As far as engine balancing goes, race cars (mostly drag cars from my experience) use solid motor mounts. Engine dynos use solid motor mounts. I understand you theory on rubber mounts taking the cushion but don't think a solid motor mount would cause more wear on the internals of an engine. Just my thoughts.
no that's just it, even though the rubber mounts would absorb the energy, the internals are still moving sideways inside the engine
with the solid mounts, there is no sideways energy because the engine can't move, and it gets channeled down the driveshaft instead turning it harder and therefore the engine internals never have to experience lateral forces just from reving your engine
#74
Originally Posted by Havok_RLS2
That's a good point too. But think about it like this...
The Nissan Engineers and designers did infact do a lot of crash testing on our cars. There were some benifits that came out of it. taks for instants the carbon fiber drive shaft that comes stock on all our cars. It was designed to shatter in a front end impact allowing the motor to break away from the motor mounts thus allowing the motor to drop out of the bottom of the car. While that CF drive shaft (due to it's lighter weight) give some performace benefits it was put there with safety in mind first.
I believe that the motor mount design are just as important as a seatbelt or an airbag in that case. It was designed to serve multiple functions to a greater good.
The Nissan Engineers and designers did infact do a lot of crash testing on our cars. There were some benifits that came out of it. taks for instants the carbon fiber drive shaft that comes stock on all our cars. It was designed to shatter in a front end impact allowing the motor to break away from the motor mounts thus allowing the motor to drop out of the bottom of the car. While that CF drive shaft (due to it's lighter weight) give some performace benefits it was put there with safety in mind first.
I believe that the motor mount design are just as important as a seatbelt or an airbag in that case. It was designed to serve multiple functions to a greater good.
too bad the G35 doesn't have a carbon fiber driveshaft though.
yeah I'm sure they did a lot of testing. I think it's probably the overall everything why they chose to go with rubber mounts - no vibration and probably a little better at crashes. They know that their target market are mainly people who like how the car looks and drives and not crazy people like us who want to put forced induction and roll cages on it
#75
i use nylock nuts on the bolts we use, so even if the bolt could possibly loosen up, it would never be able to unscrew more by itself. no need to worry there. but as sentry was saying, with people removing their front bumper beams to fit the greddy tt kit (including myself, lol) sometimes form can outway function. i made my mounts for the main reason of satisfiying road racers and drag racers, where possibly other safety devices have been incorporated. i personally love to run solid mounts on the street, and always have, because i love the feel of them. more solid drivetrain responce, and more solid clutch feel.
with the driveline still being able to shatter, i would highly doubt the aluminum block mounts to stay in one piece, and the motor to shove under the car as designed.
with the driveline still being able to shatter, i would highly doubt the aluminum block mounts to stay in one piece, and the motor to shove under the car as designed.
#76
Originally Posted by sentry65
too bad the G35 doesn't have a carbon fiber driveshaft though.
yeah I'm sure they did a lot of testing. I think it's probably the overall everything why they chose to go with rubber mounts - no vibration and probably a little better at crashes. They know that their target market are mainly people who like how the car looks and drives and not crazy people like us who want to put forced induction and roll cages on it
yeah I'm sure they did a lot of testing. I think it's probably the overall everything why they chose to go with rubber mounts - no vibration and probably a little better at crashes. They know that their target market are mainly people who like how the car looks and drives and not crazy people like us who want to put forced induction and roll cages on it
#77
Wow. Two different products for the same ultimate purpose, one priced more than the other. Both seem to get the job done. Let it go already, all the possible points have been made and scored.
#78
Originally Posted by gringott
Wow. Two different products for the same ultimate purpose, one priced more than the other. Both seem to get the job done. Let it go already, all the possible points have been made and scored.